A Balancing Act: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis of Family-Focused Practice in Adult Mental Health Services.

IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
M Tuck, A Wittkowski, L Gregg
{"title":"A Balancing Act: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis of Family-Focused Practice in Adult Mental Health Services.","authors":"M Tuck, A Wittkowski, L Gregg","doi":"10.1007/s10567-022-00418-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parental mental illness is a major international public health concern given its implications for whole families, including children. Family-focused practice (FFP), an approach that emphasises a \"whole-family\" approach to care, provides an opportunity to mitigate the significant risks associated with parental mental health difficulties. The positive benefits associated with FFP have led to a shift in policy and practice towards prioritising FFP within adult mental health services. However, evidence suggests that FFP remains scarce and is not routine. Research has identified the important role of practitioners in facilitating FFP. The current review identified, synthesised and appraised the international qualitative literature examining adult mental health practitioners' implementation experiences of FFP. It aimed to provide an evidence-informed account of practitioner experiences of FFP delivery and to identify key recommendations to enhance future FFP outcomes in AMHS. Ovid Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL plus, EMBASE and Web of Science Core Collection were searched systematically, in line with PRISMA guidance, up to January 2022. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) was used to undertake the quality appraisal prior to a thematic synthesis being conducted. The review was registered on PROSPERO. Nineteen papers, spanning 17 years of research with 469 practitioners, were included. Three main themes and 14 subthemes were developed, representing different aspects of practitioner experiences of FFP delivery. Practitioners' approach to FFP was variable and influenced by their beliefs about FFP, perceived roles and responsibilities, competence, service setting, and personal parenting status. Practitioners engaged in a balancing act to maintain a dual focus on their service-users and their children, to navigate powerful emotions, and consider multiple perspectives in a biomedical organisational structure that advocates individualised treatment. Although working together unified teams, a greater need for external interagency collaboration was identified. The use of strength-based approaches with clients and dedicated staff resources, within clear guidelines and frameworks, was reported to be necessary to maximise FFP delivery. This review proposes a complex FFP dynamic whereby practitioners engage in a constant balancing act between FFP stakeholders to achieve meaningful FFP outcomes for service-users and their families. Service recommendations are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"190-211"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00418-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parental mental illness is a major international public health concern given its implications for whole families, including children. Family-focused practice (FFP), an approach that emphasises a "whole-family" approach to care, provides an opportunity to mitigate the significant risks associated with parental mental health difficulties. The positive benefits associated with FFP have led to a shift in policy and practice towards prioritising FFP within adult mental health services. However, evidence suggests that FFP remains scarce and is not routine. Research has identified the important role of practitioners in facilitating FFP. The current review identified, synthesised and appraised the international qualitative literature examining adult mental health practitioners' implementation experiences of FFP. It aimed to provide an evidence-informed account of practitioner experiences of FFP delivery and to identify key recommendations to enhance future FFP outcomes in AMHS. Ovid Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL plus, EMBASE and Web of Science Core Collection were searched systematically, in line with PRISMA guidance, up to January 2022. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) was used to undertake the quality appraisal prior to a thematic synthesis being conducted. The review was registered on PROSPERO. Nineteen papers, spanning 17 years of research with 469 practitioners, were included. Three main themes and 14 subthemes were developed, representing different aspects of practitioner experiences of FFP delivery. Practitioners' approach to FFP was variable and influenced by their beliefs about FFP, perceived roles and responsibilities, competence, service setting, and personal parenting status. Practitioners engaged in a balancing act to maintain a dual focus on their service-users and their children, to navigate powerful emotions, and consider multiple perspectives in a biomedical organisational structure that advocates individualised treatment. Although working together unified teams, a greater need for external interagency collaboration was identified. The use of strength-based approaches with clients and dedicated staff resources, within clear guidelines and frameworks, was reported to be necessary to maximise FFP delivery. This review proposes a complex FFP dynamic whereby practitioners engage in a constant balancing act between FFP stakeholders to achieve meaningful FFP outcomes for service-users and their families. Service recommendations are provided.

Abstract Image

平衡法》:成人心理健康服务中以家庭为中心的实践的系统回顾和元综合。
父母的精神疾病对包括儿童在内的整个家庭都有影响,因此是国际公共卫生关注的主要问题。以家庭为中心的实践(FFP)是一种强调 "全家庭 "护理的方法,它为减轻与父母精神健康问题相关的重大风险提供了机会。以家庭为中心的实践所带来的积极益处促使政策和实践转向在成人心理健康服务中优先考虑以家庭为中心的实践。然而,有证据表明,家庭病床仍然很少,也不是常规做法。研究发现,从业人员在促进全功能家庭护理方面发挥着重要作用。本综述对研究成人心理健康从业者实施全功能家庭护理经验的国际定性文献进行了识别、综合和评估。其目的是对从业人员实施全功能家庭护理的经验提供有据可依的说明,并确定关键建议,以提高未来全功能家庭护理在成人心理健康服务中的成果。根据 PRISMA 指南,对 Ovid Medline、PsycInfo、CINAHL plus、EMBASE 和 Web of Science Core Collection 进行了系统检索,检索期截至 2022 年 1 月。在进行专题综述之前,采用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)进行质量评估。该综述已在 PROSPERO 上注册。19篇论文被收录其中,这些论文的研究时间跨度长达17年,涉及469名从业人员。共制定了三大主题和 14 个次主题,代表了从业人员在提供财务和财务自由方面的不同经验。从业人员对全功能家庭护理的态度是多变的,并受到他们对全功能家庭护理的信念、认知的角色和责任、能力、服务环境和个人养育状况的影响。从业人员要在主张个性化治疗的生物医学组织结构中保持对服务对象及其子女的双重关注、驾驭强烈的情绪并考虑多角度因素,从而在这一过程中取得平衡。虽然团队间的合作是统一的,但也发现了外部机构间合作的更大需求。据报告,在明确的指导方针和框架内,有必要对服务对象采用以力量为基础的方法,并提供专门的人力资源,以最大限度地提供家庭护理服务。本次审查提出了一种复杂的 "家庭便利项目 "动态,即从业人员在 "家庭便利项目 "利益相关者之间不断进行平衡,以便为服务使用者及其家庭实现有意义的 "家庭便利项目 "成果。提供了服务建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信