Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Professionals Working in End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lori Covington, Moitree Banerjee, Antonina Pereira, Marie Price
{"title":"Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Professionals Working in End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Lori Covington,&nbsp;Moitree Banerjee,&nbsp;Antonina Pereira,&nbsp;Marie Price","doi":"10.1177/08258597221100330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The potential usefulness of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) is being investigated for healthcare staff burnout and associated problems, but empirical research on MBI's for end-of-life (EOL) professionals is still in its infancy. The aim of this review is to describe and evaluate the body of evidence-based research on the use of MBIs to support the psychological wellbeing of professional staff in EOL care settings. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Database records were extracted from ERIC, PsycInfo, EBSCO, PubMed Central (PMC) and Web of Science, using search terms to locate peer-reviewed studies on professional (not volunteer) staff in dedicated end-of-life settings, administering MBIs not embedded in more general therapeutic modalities (such as ACT or DBT). After removing duplicates, 8701 potential studies were identified: eliminating those that did not fit the eligibility criteria reduced the number of eligible studies to six. <b>Results:</b> A total of six empirical studies were identified and further evaluated. Interventions primarily focussed on reducing burnout symptoms, increasing self-care and self-compassion, and fostering mindfulness. Studies demonstrated very little overlap in treatment, methodology and measures. Only one study was a randomised control trial, which on application of the 3-item Jadad quality scoring, (evidence of randomisation, blinding of researcher to participants' identity and accounts provided of all participants), achieved 1 out of 5 possible points. Furthermore, other concerns were identified as to the study's methodology. <b>Conclusions:</b> Results of this review point to significant gaps in the research on the potential of MBIs to improve the wellbeing of EOL professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/70/10.1177_08258597221100330.PMC10026168.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597221100330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: The potential usefulness of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) is being investigated for healthcare staff burnout and associated problems, but empirical research on MBI's for end-of-life (EOL) professionals is still in its infancy. The aim of this review is to describe and evaluate the body of evidence-based research on the use of MBIs to support the psychological wellbeing of professional staff in EOL care settings. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Database records were extracted from ERIC, PsycInfo, EBSCO, PubMed Central (PMC) and Web of Science, using search terms to locate peer-reviewed studies on professional (not volunteer) staff in dedicated end-of-life settings, administering MBIs not embedded in more general therapeutic modalities (such as ACT or DBT). After removing duplicates, 8701 potential studies were identified: eliminating those that did not fit the eligibility criteria reduced the number of eligible studies to six. Results: A total of six empirical studies were identified and further evaluated. Interventions primarily focussed on reducing burnout symptoms, increasing self-care and self-compassion, and fostering mindfulness. Studies demonstrated very little overlap in treatment, methodology and measures. Only one study was a randomised control trial, which on application of the 3-item Jadad quality scoring, (evidence of randomisation, blinding of researcher to participants' identity and accounts provided of all participants), achieved 1 out of 5 possible points. Furthermore, other concerns were identified as to the study's methodology. Conclusions: Results of this review point to significant gaps in the research on the potential of MBIs to improve the wellbeing of EOL professionals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临终关怀专业人员的正念干预:文献的系统回顾。
目的:正念干预(MBI)的潜在用途正在调查医疗人员倦怠和相关问题,但MBI的实证研究临终(EOL)专业人员仍处于起步阶段。本综述的目的是描述和评估以证据为基础的研究,这些研究是关于在EOL护理环境中使用MBIs来支持专业人员心理健康的。方法:对相关文献进行系统回顾。数据库记录从ERIC, PsycInfo, EBSCO, PubMed Central (PMC)和Web of Science中提取,使用搜索词定位专业(非志愿者)人员在专门的临终环境中进行的同行评审研究,管理不嵌入更一般治疗模式(如ACT或DBT)的mbi。在去除重复项后,确定了8701项潜在研究:消除不符合资格标准的研究将合格研究的数量减少到6项。结果:共确定了6项实证研究,并对其进行了进一步评价。干预措施主要侧重于减少倦怠症状,增加自我照顾和自我同情,以及培养正念。研究表明,在治疗、方法和措施方面几乎没有重叠。只有一项研究是随机对照试验,应用3项Jadad质量评分(随机化的证据,研究人员对参与者的身份和所有参与者提供的帐户进行盲化),达到了5分中的1分。此外,还确定了对研究方法的其他关切。结论:本综述的结果指出了mbi在改善EOL专业人员健康方面的潜力研究的重大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信