Organic Data and Research from the ARMS Survey: Findings on Competitiveness of the Organic Soybean Sector

William D. McBride, Catherine R. Greene
{"title":"Organic Data and Research from the ARMS Survey: Findings on Competitiveness of the Organic Soybean Sector","authors":"William D. McBride,&nbsp;Catherine R. Greene","doi":"10.1094/CM-2013-0429-04-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Organic production has expanded rapidly in the US over the last decade, particularly for specialty crops. In 2005, USDA's Economic Research Service (ERS) and National Agricultural Statistics (NASS) began to include targeted sub-samples of organic producers in its major annual economic survey, the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS). In this article we use data from the 2006 ARMS to examine the characteristics of producers adopting the organic production approach to soybean production, and contrast these with conventional producers. Organic soybean producers were younger, had less acreage, were less likely to work off-farm, and were more often located in northern states than conventional soybean producers. Also, differences in the costs of production for each system are derived. Results indicate that the average costs for producing soybeans were higher for producers using the organic approach in 2006 after accounting for the influence of other factors on production costs, sample selection bias, and organic transition costs, but were covered by the higher premiums that year. However, the organic price premium for soybeans has narrowed since 2006, and reduced the economic incentive for converting to or maintaining an organic system.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100342,"journal":{"name":"Crop Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1094/CM-2013-0429-04-RS","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/CM-2013-0429-04-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Organic production has expanded rapidly in the US over the last decade, particularly for specialty crops. In 2005, USDA's Economic Research Service (ERS) and National Agricultural Statistics (NASS) began to include targeted sub-samples of organic producers in its major annual economic survey, the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS). In this article we use data from the 2006 ARMS to examine the characteristics of producers adopting the organic production approach to soybean production, and contrast these with conventional producers. Organic soybean producers were younger, had less acreage, were less likely to work off-farm, and were more often located in northern states than conventional soybean producers. Also, differences in the costs of production for each system are derived. Results indicate that the average costs for producing soybeans were higher for producers using the organic approach in 2006 after accounting for the influence of other factors on production costs, sample selection bias, and organic transition costs, but were covered by the higher premiums that year. However, the organic price premium for soybeans has narrowed since 2006, and reduced the economic incentive for converting to or maintaining an organic system.

来自ARMS调查的有机数据与研究:关于有机大豆行业竞争力的发现
在过去的十年里,有机生产在美国迅速扩张,特别是特种作物。2005年,美国农业部经济研究局(ERS)和国家农业统计局(NASS)开始在其主要的年度经济调查——农业资源管理调查(ARMS)中纳入有机生产者的目标子样本。在本文中,我们使用2006年ARMS的数据来检验采用有机生产方式生产大豆的生产者的特征,并将其与传统生产者进行对比。有机大豆生产者更年轻,占地面积更小,不太可能在农场外工作,而且比传统大豆生产者更多地位于北部各州。此外,还推导出了每个系统的生产成本差异。结果表明,考虑到其他因素对生产成本、样本选择偏差和有机过渡成本的影响,2006年采用有机方式生产大豆的生产者的平均成本较高,但被当年较高的溢价所覆盖。然而,自2006年以来,大豆的有机价格溢价已经收窄,这降低了转向或维持有机系统的经济动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信