How much advance notice do workers need? A review and theoretical framework for determining advance notice periods for unpredictable work.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Industrial Health Pub Date : 2024-02-09 Epub Date: 2023-03-21 DOI:10.2486/indhealth.2022-0140
Madeline Sprajcer, Sally A Ferguson, Drew Dawson
{"title":"How much advance notice do workers need? A review and theoretical framework for determining advance notice periods for unpredictable work.","authors":"Madeline Sprajcer, Sally A Ferguson, Drew Dawson","doi":"10.2486/indhealth.2022-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regulatory guidance materials for fatigue management typically advise that employees be provided with days or weeks of advance notice of schedules/rosters. However, the scientific evidence underpinning this advice is unclear. A systematic search was performed on current peer reviewed literature addressing advance notice periods, which found three relevant studies. A subsequent search of grey literature to determine the quality of evidence for the recommendation for advance notice periods returned 37 relevant documents. This review found that fatigue management guidance materials frequently advocated advance notice for work shifts but did not provide empirical evidence to underpin the advice. Although it is logical to suggest that longer notice periods may result in increased opportunities for pre-work preparations, improved sleep, and reduced worker fatigue, the current guidance appears to be premised on this reasoning rather than empirical evidence. Paradoxically, it is possible that advance notice could be counterproductive, as too much may result in frequent alterations to the schedule, particularly where adjustments to start and end times of the work period are not uncommon (e.g., road transport, rail). To assist organisations in determining the appropriate amount of advance notice to provide, we propose a novel theoretical framework to conceptualise advance notice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13531,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Health","volume":" ","pages":"2-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10865088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2022-0140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulatory guidance materials for fatigue management typically advise that employees be provided with days or weeks of advance notice of schedules/rosters. However, the scientific evidence underpinning this advice is unclear. A systematic search was performed on current peer reviewed literature addressing advance notice periods, which found three relevant studies. A subsequent search of grey literature to determine the quality of evidence for the recommendation for advance notice periods returned 37 relevant documents. This review found that fatigue management guidance materials frequently advocated advance notice for work shifts but did not provide empirical evidence to underpin the advice. Although it is logical to suggest that longer notice periods may result in increased opportunities for pre-work preparations, improved sleep, and reduced worker fatigue, the current guidance appears to be premised on this reasoning rather than empirical evidence. Paradoxically, it is possible that advance notice could be counterproductive, as too much may result in frequent alterations to the schedule, particularly where adjustments to start and end times of the work period are not uncommon (e.g., road transport, rail). To assist organisations in determining the appropriate amount of advance notice to provide, we propose a novel theoretical framework to conceptualise advance notice.

工人需要提前多少时间通知?确定不可预测工作提前通知期的回顾和理论框架。
有关疲劳管理的监管指导材料通常建议提前数天或数周通知员工日程安排/轮休。然而,支持这一建议的科学证据并不明确。我们对当前有关提前通知期的同行评审文献进行了系统搜索,发现了三项相关研究。随后又对灰色文献进行了搜索,以确定有关提前通知期建议的证据质量,共搜索到 37 篇相关文献。审查发现,疲劳管理指导材料经常提倡提前通知工作班次,但没有提供支持该建议的经验证据。虽然延长通知期可能会增加工作前准备的机会、改善睡眠和减少工人的疲劳,这是合乎逻辑的,但目前的指导似乎是以这种推理而非经验证据为前提的。自相矛盾的是,提前通知可能会适得其反,因为过多的提前通知可能会导致时间表的频繁更改,特别是在调整工作开始和结束时间的情况下(如公路运输、铁路运输)。为了帮助组织确定适当的提前通知量,我们提出了一个新颖的理论框架来构思提前通知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industrial Health
Industrial Health 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH covers all aspects of occupational medicine, ergonomics, industrial hygiene, engineering, safety and policy sciences. The journal helps promote solutions for the control and improvement of working conditions, and for the application of valuable research findings to the actual working environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信