The percentage acceptability of the non-pharmaceutical measures in containing the spread of COVID-19 in Abuja, Nigeria

C. Nwachukwu, A. Nwachukwu
{"title":"The percentage acceptability of the non-pharmaceutical measures in containing the spread of COVID-19 in Abuja, Nigeria","authors":"C. Nwachukwu, A. Nwachukwu","doi":"10.4314/jopat.v21i2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 is an efficient super spreading disease with numerical superiority among past pandemics. Vaccination, medication, drug repurposing are the pharmaceutical measures currently in use in combating the spread of COVID-19. However, the populace is skeptical about their use. The study objective was testing the acceptability of non-pharmaceutical measures in containing the spread. The phase-1 of the study is sourced from secondary data using appropriate keywords on six electronic databases, including ‘effective non-pharmaceutical intervention strategic’, ‘symptoms of COVID-19’, and ‘COVID-19 mode of transmissions’. The phase-2 is a Questionnaire from the phase-1 outcome which was administered to 2000 people in the Abuja metropolis. Phase-1 showed that the non-pharmaceutical measures for combating COVID-19 disease were handwashing, facemask, personal hygiene, restricted mass gathering, workplace closures, contact tracing, travel restrictions, quarantine, alcohol hand-based sanitizers, physical distancing, and nutritional intervention. Phase-2 results on the acceptability of non-pharmaceutical measures by 2000 people were; handwashing (24%), facemask (5%), personal hygiene (18%), workplace closures (4%), contact tracing (6%), travel restrictions (9%), quarantine (8%), alcohol hand-based sanitizers (10%), physical distancing (5%), and nutritional intervention (11%). Workplace closures have the lowest acceptability. In conclusion, the lowest value of workplace closure is hinged on the family economy.","PeriodicalId":7592,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Phytomedicine and Clinical Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Phytomedicine and Clinical Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/jopat.v21i2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 is an efficient super spreading disease with numerical superiority among past pandemics. Vaccination, medication, drug repurposing are the pharmaceutical measures currently in use in combating the spread of COVID-19. However, the populace is skeptical about their use. The study objective was testing the acceptability of non-pharmaceutical measures in containing the spread. The phase-1 of the study is sourced from secondary data using appropriate keywords on six electronic databases, including ‘effective non-pharmaceutical intervention strategic’, ‘symptoms of COVID-19’, and ‘COVID-19 mode of transmissions’. The phase-2 is a Questionnaire from the phase-1 outcome which was administered to 2000 people in the Abuja metropolis. Phase-1 showed that the non-pharmaceutical measures for combating COVID-19 disease were handwashing, facemask, personal hygiene, restricted mass gathering, workplace closures, contact tracing, travel restrictions, quarantine, alcohol hand-based sanitizers, physical distancing, and nutritional intervention. Phase-2 results on the acceptability of non-pharmaceutical measures by 2000 people were; handwashing (24%), facemask (5%), personal hygiene (18%), workplace closures (4%), contact tracing (6%), travel restrictions (9%), quarantine (8%), alcohol hand-based sanitizers (10%), physical distancing (5%), and nutritional intervention (11%). Workplace closures have the lowest acceptability. In conclusion, the lowest value of workplace closure is hinged on the family economy.
在尼日利亚阿布贾遏制COVID-19传播的非药物措施的可接受程度百分比
COVID-19是一种高效的超级传播疾病,在过去的大流行中具有数量优势。疫苗接种、药物治疗和药物再利用是目前用于防治COVID-19传播的药物措施。然而,民众对它们的使用持怀疑态度。研究目的是检验非药物措施在控制传播方面的可接受性。该研究的第一阶段使用六个电子数据库中的适当关键词获取二手数据,包括“有效的非药物干预策略”、“COVID-19症状”和“COVID-19传播方式”。第二阶段是第一阶段成果的问卷调查,在阿布贾大都会对2000人进行了调查。第一阶段显示,应对COVID-19疾病的非药物措施是洗手、佩戴口罩、个人卫生、限制人群聚集、关闭工作场所、接触者追踪、限制旅行、隔离、使用酒精洗手液、保持身体距离和营养干预。第二阶段2000人对非药物措施可接受性的结果是;洗手(24%)、佩戴口罩(5%)、保持个人卫生(18%)、关闭工作场所(4%)、追踪接触者(6%)、旅行限制(9%)、隔离(8%)、使用含酒精的洗手液(10%)、保持身体距离(5%)和营养干预(11%)。关闭工作场所的可接受性最低。综上所述,工作场所关闭的最低价值取决于家庭经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信