Smartwatch-based bioimpedance analysis for body composition estimation: precision and agreement with a 4-compartment model.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Caleb F Brandner, Grant M Tinsley, Austin J Graybeal
{"title":"Smartwatch-based bioimpedance analysis for body composition estimation: precision and agreement with a 4-compartment model.","authors":"Caleb F Brandner,&nbsp;Grant M Tinsley,&nbsp;Austin J Graybeal","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2022-0301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given that the prevalence of smartwatches has allowed them to become a hallmark in health monitoring, they are primed to provide accessible body composition estimations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the precision and agreement of smartwatch-based bioimpedance analysis (SW-BIA) and multifrequency bioimpedance analysis (MFBIA) against a 4-compartment (4C) model criterion. A total of 186 participants (114 females) underwent body composition assessments necessary for a 4C model and SW-BIA and MFBIA. Values of total body water (TBW) from each device were compared with those obtained from bioimpedance spectroscopy. Precision was adequate though slightly lower for the smartwatch compared with other methods. No device demonstrated equivalence with the 4C model. Specifically, the SW-BIA overestimated and MFBIA underestimated body fat. MFBIA, but not SW-BIA, demonstrated equivalence for TBW. Overall error was higher for males using the smartwatch compared with females. While these findings do not invalidate the use of smartwatch-based estimates, clinicians should consider that there may be large errors relative to clinical measures. If this wearable device is intended to be used to monitor body composition change over time, these findings demonstrate the need for future research to evaluate its accuracy during follow-up testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8116,"journal":{"name":"Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2022-0301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given that the prevalence of smartwatches has allowed them to become a hallmark in health monitoring, they are primed to provide accessible body composition estimations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the precision and agreement of smartwatch-based bioimpedance analysis (SW-BIA) and multifrequency bioimpedance analysis (MFBIA) against a 4-compartment (4C) model criterion. A total of 186 participants (114 females) underwent body composition assessments necessary for a 4C model and SW-BIA and MFBIA. Values of total body water (TBW) from each device were compared with those obtained from bioimpedance spectroscopy. Precision was adequate though slightly lower for the smartwatch compared with other methods. No device demonstrated equivalence with the 4C model. Specifically, the SW-BIA overestimated and MFBIA underestimated body fat. MFBIA, but not SW-BIA, demonstrated equivalence for TBW. Overall error was higher for males using the smartwatch compared with females. While these findings do not invalidate the use of smartwatch-based estimates, clinicians should consider that there may be large errors relative to clinical measures. If this wearable device is intended to be used to monitor body composition change over time, these findings demonstrate the need for future research to evaluate its accuracy during follow-up testing.

基于智能手表的生物阻抗分析用于身体成分估计:精度和与四室模型的一致性。
鉴于智能手表的普及已使其成为健康监测的标志,它们已准备好提供易于获取的身体成分估计。本研究的目的是根据4室(4C)模型标准评估基于智能手表的生物阻抗分析(SW-BIA)和多频生物阻抗分析(MFBIA)的准确性和一致性。共有186名参与者(114名女性)接受了4C模型和SW-BIA和MFBIA所需的身体成分评估。用生物阻抗谱法测定各装置的总水(TBW)。与其他方法相比,智能手表的精度略低,但仍然足够。没有设备证明与4C模型等效。具体来说,SW-BIA高估了体脂,而MFBIA低估了体脂。MFBIA,而不是SW-BIA,证明了TBW的等效性。与女性相比,男性使用智能手表的总体误差更高。虽然这些发现并没有使使用基于智能手表的估计无效,但临床医生应该考虑到相对于临床测量可能存在较大的误差。如果这种可穿戴设备是用来监测身体成分随时间的变化,这些发现表明,需要进一步的研究来评估其在后续测试中的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism publishes original research articles, reviews, and commentaries, focussing on the application of physiology, nutrition, and metabolism to the study of human health, physical activity, and fitness. The published research, reviews, and symposia will be of interest to exercise physiologists, physical fitness and exercise rehabilitation specialists, public health and health care professionals, as well as basic and applied physiologists, nutritionists, and biochemists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信