Performance of First Response® and CareStart™ Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Plasmodium falciparum in a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana

Bernice Ameyaw, M. Mutocheluh, M. Owusu, A. Khalifah, R. Duneeh, P. Narkwa
{"title":"Performance of First Response® and CareStart™ Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Plasmodium falciparum in a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana","authors":"Bernice Ameyaw, M. Mutocheluh, M. Owusu, A. Khalifah, R. Duneeh, P. Narkwa","doi":"10.9734/BJMMR/2017/30892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Malaria poses a major public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa. In Ghana, millions of people are potentially at risk of Plasmodium falciparum infections annually. The current study evaluated the performance of two Histidine rich protein 2 (HRP-2) rapid diagnostic tests (First Response® and CareStart™) using giemsa stained microscopy (microscopy) as the gold standard. This cross-sectional study which took place at the Komfo (KATH) in Kumasi from October 2014 to March, 2015 was done to monitor the performance of RDTs that are used regularly in Ghana. Methodology: A total of 400 children (239 males, 161 females; age range 1-17 years) with fever or history suggestive of malaria were included in the study. First Response® and CareStart™ diagnostic accuracy results were compared with that of microscopy. The strength of agreements (kappa) between the microscopy and the two RDTs were also calculated. Results: Of the 400 blood films that were examined using microscopy, Plasmodium parasites were detected in 33 (8.3%) of them. First Response® showed positive results in 65 (16.3%) and CareStart™ showed positive results in 68 (17.0%). The sensitivities of both First Response® and CareStart™ when compared with microscopy were 97.0% (95% CI: 84.2-99.9) and 97.0% (95% CI: 84.2-99.9) respectively. The specificities were First Response® 91.0% (95% CI: 87.6-93.7) and CareStart™ 90.2% (95% CI: 86.7-93.0). The strength of agreement (kappa) between microscopy and First Response® and CareStart™ with 95% confidence interval was good for the First Response® (giemsa stain microscopy vs First Response®: 0.61) and moderate for CareStart™ (giemsa stain microscopy vs CareStart™: 0.59). Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the First Response® and CareStart™ RDTs to detect malaria was good with no significant differences between the two rapid test kits when compared with microscopy. The RDTs are a suitable alternative to microscopy to test for malaria in rural areas. Therapy (ACT), Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Disease (TDR), Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), and the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Paediatric Emergency Unit (PEU), Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Accident and Emergency (A&E), Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Complete Blood Count (CBC), High power fields (HPF), White blood cells (WBCs), Red blood cells (RBCs), Positive predictive value (PPV), Negative predictive value (NPV), Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), Plasmodium aldolase (pAldo), Polymerase chain reaction (PCR).","PeriodicalId":9249,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medicine and medical research","volume":"18 7","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medicine and medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2017/30892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Malaria poses a major public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa. In Ghana, millions of people are potentially at risk of Plasmodium falciparum infections annually. The current study evaluated the performance of two Histidine rich protein 2 (HRP-2) rapid diagnostic tests (First Response® and CareStart™) using giemsa stained microscopy (microscopy) as the gold standard. This cross-sectional study which took place at the Komfo (KATH) in Kumasi from October 2014 to March, 2015 was done to monitor the performance of RDTs that are used regularly in Ghana. Methodology: A total of 400 children (239 males, 161 females; age range 1-17 years) with fever or history suggestive of malaria were included in the study. First Response® and CareStart™ diagnostic accuracy results were compared with that of microscopy. The strength of agreements (kappa) between the microscopy and the two RDTs were also calculated. Results: Of the 400 blood films that were examined using microscopy, Plasmodium parasites were detected in 33 (8.3%) of them. First Response® showed positive results in 65 (16.3%) and CareStart™ showed positive results in 68 (17.0%). The sensitivities of both First Response® and CareStart™ when compared with microscopy were 97.0% (95% CI: 84.2-99.9) and 97.0% (95% CI: 84.2-99.9) respectively. The specificities were First Response® 91.0% (95% CI: 87.6-93.7) and CareStart™ 90.2% (95% CI: 86.7-93.0). The strength of agreement (kappa) between microscopy and First Response® and CareStart™ with 95% confidence interval was good for the First Response® (giemsa stain microscopy vs First Response®: 0.61) and moderate for CareStart™ (giemsa stain microscopy vs CareStart™: 0.59). Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the First Response® and CareStart™ RDTs to detect malaria was good with no significant differences between the two rapid test kits when compared with microscopy. The RDTs are a suitable alternative to microscopy to test for malaria in rural areas. Therapy (ACT), Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Disease (TDR), Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), and the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Paediatric Emergency Unit (PEU), Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Accident and Emergency (A&E), Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Complete Blood Count (CBC), High power fields (HPF), White blood cells (WBCs), Red blood cells (RBCs), Positive predictive value (PPV), Negative predictive value (NPV), Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), Plasmodium aldolase (pAldo), Polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
First Response®和CareStart™疟疾快速诊断测试在加纳某三级医院检测恶性疟原虫的性能
背景:疟疾是撒哈拉以南非洲的一个主要公共卫生问题。在加纳,每年有数百万人面临感染恶性疟原虫的潜在风险。目前的研究评估了两种富组氨酸蛋白2 (HRP-2)快速诊断测试(First Response®和CareStart™)的性能,使用giemsa染色显微镜(显微镜)作为金标准。这项横断面研究于2014年10月至2015年3月在库马西的Komfo (KATH)进行,目的是监测加纳经常使用的rdt的性能。方法:共400名儿童(男239名,女161名;年龄在1-17岁之间)有发热或有疟疾病史的人都被纳入研究。将First Response®和CareStart™诊断准确性结果与显微镜检查结果进行比较。还计算了显微镜和两个rdt之间的一致性强度(kappa)。结果:镜检400份血膜,检出疟原虫33份(8.3%)。First Response®的阳性结果为65例(16.3%),CareStart™的阳性结果为68例(17.0%)。与显微镜相比,First Response®和CareStart™的灵敏度分别为97.0% (95% CI: 84.2-99.9)和97.0% (95% CI: 84.2-99.9)。特异性为First Response®91.0% (95% CI: 88.6 -93.7)和CareStart™90.2% (95% CI: 86.7-93.0)。显微镜与First Response®和CareStart™之间的一致性强度(kappa)为95%置信区间,First Response®为良好(giemsa染色显微镜与First Response®:0.61),CareStart™为中等(giemsa染色显微镜与CareStart™:0.59)。结论:First Response®和CareStart™rdt检测疟疾的诊断准确性较好,与显微镜相比,两种快速检测试剂盒之间无显著差异。在农村地区,rdt是显微镜检测疟疾的合适替代方法。治疗(ACT)、热带病研究和培训特别计划(TDR)、创新新诊断基金会(FIND)、疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)、儿科急诊科(PEU)、Komfo Anokye教学医院(KATH)、事故和急救(A&E)、乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、全血细胞计数(CBC)、高倍场(HPF)、白细胞(wbc)、红细胞(rbc)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、乳酸脱氢酶(pLDH)、醛缩酶(pAldo)、聚合酶链反应(PCR)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信