Quantitative tandem mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory: Regulation and opportunity for validation of laboratory developed tests

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Judith A. Stone , J. Grace van der Gugten
{"title":"Quantitative tandem mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory: Regulation and opportunity for validation of laboratory developed tests","authors":"Judith A. Stone ,&nbsp;J. Grace van der Gugten","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tandem mass spectrometry is an important analytical tool for clinical laboratories, but tests developed and validated in-house (laboratory developed tests, or LDTs) require special consideration. In late 2022, the forecast for United States (U.S.) federal regulation of LDTs changed unexpectedly when the VALID Act was not passed by the U.S. Congress. This Act would have modified the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) role to increase regulatory oversight for LDT providers. In this revised context, we review optimization of quantitative mass spectrometry LDT validation and suggest avenues other than an additional FDA mandate to achieve uniform best practice. Common challenges, logistical barriers, and recommendations for easing the burden of best-quality quantitative mass spectrometry LDT method validation are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":"28 ","pages":"Pages 82-90"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/82/main.PMC10017411.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X23000202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tandem mass spectrometry is an important analytical tool for clinical laboratories, but tests developed and validated in-house (laboratory developed tests, or LDTs) require special consideration. In late 2022, the forecast for United States (U.S.) federal regulation of LDTs changed unexpectedly when the VALID Act was not passed by the U.S. Congress. This Act would have modified the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) role to increase regulatory oversight for LDT providers. In this revised context, we review optimization of quantitative mass spectrometry LDT validation and suggest avenues other than an additional FDA mandate to achieve uniform best practice. Common challenges, logistical barriers, and recommendations for easing the burden of best-quality quantitative mass spectrometry LDT method validation are discussed.

Abstract Image

临床实验室的定量串联质谱分析:实验室开发的测试的规范和验证机会
串联质谱法是临床实验室的一种重要分析工具,但内部开发和验证的测试(实验室开发的测试或LDT)需要特别考虑。2022年末,由于美国国会未通过《有效法案》,对美国联邦LDT监管的预测发生了意外变化。该法案将修改美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的角色,以加强对LDT供应商的监管。在这一修订的背景下,我们审查了定量质谱LDT验证的优化,并提出了除额外的FDA授权之外的其他途径,以实现统一的最佳实践。讨论了常见的挑战、后勤障碍和减轻最佳质量定量质谱LDT方法验证负担的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信