"Comparing the Workplace Organization Method 5s with the 7 Wastes (Muda) in Waste and Failure Management Tool, in the Health Care Quality Management"

Ahsan Ali Siddiqui
{"title":"\"Comparing the Workplace Organization Method 5s with the 7 Wastes (Muda) in Waste and Failure Management Tool, in the Health Care Quality Management\"","authors":"Ahsan Ali Siddiqui","doi":"10.26717/bjstr.2021.40.006387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparing the Workplace Organization Method 5s with the 7 Wastes (Muda) in Waste and Failure Background and Objective: The main theme of this article is to discuss and compare the workplace organization method 5S with the 7 wastes (Muda) in waste and failure management tool, in the health care quality management. Methods: The Author of this article has chosen literature review methodology of 18 random research articles and quality management websites. By reviewing the literature, we have chosen 10 different points in 18 articles discussing or agreeing on where 5S and 7 Muda are beneficial. Most of the chosen articles discusses the quality management in the health sector and their benefits. Results: There is a table and SPSS diagram representing the literature review regarding 18 articles including quality management website. Table title is (18 journal articles discusses and agrees to the following 10 points). SPSS diagram clearly shows the number of times each article discusses the chosen 10 points. The 10 points includes the agreement of points beneficial for health sector by using 5S and 7 Muda methodology. Conclusion: To conclude the article, 18 of the articles including the quality management websites agrees on the use of 5S and 7 Muda methodology. Different organization around the globe are using 5S and 7 Muda methodology to get benefits for improvement of their health care system. The step-by-step process of 5S and 7 Muda methodology is smart way to start, monitor, finish and follow up the broken health system in several countries.","PeriodicalId":9035,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26717/bjstr.2021.40.006387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Comparing the Workplace Organization Method 5s with the 7 Wastes (Muda) in Waste and Failure Background and Objective: The main theme of this article is to discuss and compare the workplace organization method 5S with the 7 wastes (Muda) in waste and failure management tool, in the health care quality management. Methods: The Author of this article has chosen literature review methodology of 18 random research articles and quality management websites. By reviewing the literature, we have chosen 10 different points in 18 articles discussing or agreeing on where 5S and 7 Muda are beneficial. Most of the chosen articles discusses the quality management in the health sector and their benefits. Results: There is a table and SPSS diagram representing the literature review regarding 18 articles including quality management website. Table title is (18 journal articles discusses and agrees to the following 10 points). SPSS diagram clearly shows the number of times each article discusses the chosen 10 points. The 10 points includes the agreement of points beneficial for health sector by using 5S and 7 Muda methodology. Conclusion: To conclude the article, 18 of the articles including the quality management websites agrees on the use of 5S and 7 Muda methodology. Different organization around the globe are using 5S and 7 Muda methodology to get benefits for improvement of their health care system. The step-by-step process of 5S and 7 Muda methodology is smart way to start, monitor, finish and follow up the broken health system in several countries.
《工作场所组织方法5s与卫生保健质量管理中废物和失效管理工具中的7种废物(Muda)的比较》
背景与目的:本文的主要主题是讨论和比较工作场所组织法5s与7种废物(Muda)在卫生保健质量管理中的浪费和失效管理工具。方法:本文采用随机选取18篇研究论文和质量管理网站的文献综述方法。通过回顾文献,我们从18篇文章中选择了10个不同的观点来讨论或同意5S和7 Muda在哪些方面是有益的。大多数选定的文章讨论了卫生部门的质量管理及其好处。结果:对包括质量管理网站在内的18篇文章的文献综述,有表格和SPSS图表。表标题为(18篇期刊文章讨论并同意以下10点)。SPSS图表清楚地显示了每篇文章讨论所选10点的次数。10点包括通过使用5S和7 Muda方法商定对卫生部门有益的点。结论:包括质量管理网站在内的18篇文章同意使用5S和7 Muda方法。世界各地的不同组织都在使用5S和7muda方法来改善他们的医疗保健系统。5S和7 Muda方法的逐步过程是启动、监测、结束和跟踪几个国家破碎的卫生系统的明智方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信