Assessing Patient's Values When Selecting Treatments for Alopecia Areata: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Skin Appendage Disorders Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1159/000527251
Lara Drake, Jane Han, Sophia Reyes-Hadsall, Arash Mostaghimi, Kathie Huang
{"title":"Assessing Patient's Values When Selecting Treatments for Alopecia Areata: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.","authors":"Lara Drake, Jane Han, Sophia Reyes-Hadsall, Arash Mostaghimi, Kathie Huang","doi":"10.1159/000527251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition that results in nonscarring hair loss. There is currently only one Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for AA; as a result, a wide range of treatments are commonly administered. This study aimed to determine how patients with AA prioritize treatment characteristics when choosing a therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional national survey was distributed using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation's (NAAF) email list. This study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board. Participants were asked to rank the importance of five treatment domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,074 completed surveys (completion rate 77.4%), most respondents were female (85.4%) and white (77.8%) with an average age of 49.3 ± 15.4 years. Respondents had AA for an average of 17.7 ± 15.4 years, with 90.0% experiencing current active hair loss. 95.6% of respondents considered the treatment's ability to achieve hair regrowth as important, 93.9% listed the availability of information about the treatment (e.g., via doctor or online) as important, 89.1% ranked the treatment side effects as important, 75.7% the cost, and 68.0% the convenience of use. A sub-analysis was performed examining responses between respondents who identify as white versus nonwhite, which showed that while the order of importance was the same between groups, a significantly larger proportion of nonwhite respondents attributed higher importance to cost (white: 73.8%, nonwhite: 82.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.006) and convenience (white: 65.3%, nonwhite: 77.3%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) than their white counterparts.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>These findings identify key domains that can serve as a starting point in shared decision-making between patients and physicians. This knowledge can streamline dermatologist delivery of key information and highlight areas of improvement for future therapeutics. Limitations include the nonrandomized NAAF population with most participants being white females. Future studies should confirm these findings in other patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21844,"journal":{"name":"Skin Appendage Disorders","volume":"9 2","pages":"99-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10015646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Appendage Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition that results in nonscarring hair loss. There is currently only one Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for AA; as a result, a wide range of treatments are commonly administered. This study aimed to determine how patients with AA prioritize treatment characteristics when choosing a therapy.

Methods: A cross-sectional national survey was distributed using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation's (NAAF) email list. This study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board. Participants were asked to rank the importance of five treatment domains.

Results: Of the 1,074 completed surveys (completion rate 77.4%), most respondents were female (85.4%) and white (77.8%) with an average age of 49.3 ± 15.4 years. Respondents had AA for an average of 17.7 ± 15.4 years, with 90.0% experiencing current active hair loss. 95.6% of respondents considered the treatment's ability to achieve hair regrowth as important, 93.9% listed the availability of information about the treatment (e.g., via doctor or online) as important, 89.1% ranked the treatment side effects as important, 75.7% the cost, and 68.0% the convenience of use. A sub-analysis was performed examining responses between respondents who identify as white versus nonwhite, which showed that while the order of importance was the same between groups, a significantly larger proportion of nonwhite respondents attributed higher importance to cost (white: 73.8%, nonwhite: 82.4%; p = 0.006) and convenience (white: 65.3%, nonwhite: 77.3%; p < 0.001) than their white counterparts.

Discussion/conclusion: These findings identify key domains that can serve as a starting point in shared decision-making between patients and physicians. This knowledge can streamline dermatologist delivery of key information and highlight areas of improvement for future therapeutics. Limitations include the nonrandomized NAAF population with most participants being white females. Future studies should confirm these findings in other patient populations.

评估患者在选择脱发治疗方法时的价值观:一项横断面调查研究。
简介斑秃(AA)是一种导致非瘢痕性脱发的自身免疫性疾病。目前,只有一种治疗 AA 的方法获得了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的批准;因此,人们通常会采用多种治疗方法。本研究旨在确定 AA 患者在选择治疗方法时如何优先考虑治疗特点:方法:通过全国脱发基金会(NAAF)的电子邮件列表发布了一项横断面全国调查。这项研究获得了麻省总医院机构审查委员会(Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board)的批准。调查要求参与者对五个治疗领域的重要性进行排序:在完成的 1,074 份调查问卷中(完成率为 77.4%),大多数受访者为女性(85.4%)和白人(77.8%),平均年龄为 49.3 ± 15.4 岁。受访者平均 AA 了 17.7 ± 15.4 年,90.0% 的受访者目前正在脱发。95.6%的受访者认为治疗实现头发再生的能力很重要,93.9%的受访者认为治疗信息的可获得性(如通过医生或网络)很重要,89.1%的受访者认为治疗副作用很重要,75.7%的受访者认为费用很重要,68.0%的受访者认为使用方便很重要。我们还对白人和非白人受访者的回答进行了子分析,结果显示,虽然各群体的重要性顺序相同,但非白人受访者对成本(白人:73.8%,非白人:82.4%;p = 0.006)和便利性(白人:65.3%,非白人:77.3%;p < 0.001)的重视程度明显高于白人受访者:这些研究结果确定了一些关键领域,可作为患者和医生共同决策的起点。这些知识可以简化皮肤科医生提供关键信息的过程,并突出未来治疗方法需要改进的领域。研究的局限性包括:NAAF 的研究对象为非随机人群,大多数参与者为白人女性。未来的研究应在其他患者群体中证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信