COVID-19 Crisis Management Left Tacit Knowledge Behind

E. Lester
{"title":"COVID-19 Crisis Management Left Tacit Knowledge Behind","authors":"E. Lester","doi":"10.33423/ajm.v23i1.6038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the COVID-19 pandemic raged throughout New York City and its surrounding suburbs, more than 500,000 positive cases and 30,000 deaths were recorded between early March and early May 2020. In response, built environment firms were forced to confront uncertainty, shift mindsets, and embrace new workflows to remain viable in the face of city and state mandatory stay-at-home orders and curfews. This required the creation of new internal processes for document dissemination. Firms focused on alleviating clients' concerns and boosting productivity by providing information, a hierarchy of business processes, and new codes of conduct. Utilizing case study methodology, this evolution at one architecture firm was tracked. Semi-structured interviews prior to and after the early wave of the pandemic clarified and verified findings. Participants were asked probing follow up questions to better understand the impacts, especially regarding tacit knowledge. The firm's efforts were optimized, but tacit knowledge sharing disappeared. Once this form of knowledge sharing was highlighted, participants acknowledged the loss and speculated about how to address this critical activity moving forward. © 2021 Proceedings of the 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, ARCOM 2021. All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":91998,"journal":{"name":"American journal of information management","volume":"570 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v23i1.6038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic raged throughout New York City and its surrounding suburbs, more than 500,000 positive cases and 30,000 deaths were recorded between early March and early May 2020. In response, built environment firms were forced to confront uncertainty, shift mindsets, and embrace new workflows to remain viable in the face of city and state mandatory stay-at-home orders and curfews. This required the creation of new internal processes for document dissemination. Firms focused on alleviating clients' concerns and boosting productivity by providing information, a hierarchy of business processes, and new codes of conduct. Utilizing case study methodology, this evolution at one architecture firm was tracked. Semi-structured interviews prior to and after the early wave of the pandemic clarified and verified findings. Participants were asked probing follow up questions to better understand the impacts, especially regarding tacit knowledge. The firm's efforts were optimized, but tacit knowledge sharing disappeared. Once this form of knowledge sharing was highlighted, participants acknowledged the loss and speculated about how to address this critical activity moving forward. © 2021 Proceedings of the 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, ARCOM 2021. All Rights Reserved.
COVID-19危机管理将隐性知识抛在后面
随着COVID-19大流行在纽约市及其周边郊区肆虐,2020年3月初至5月初,记录了50多万例阳性病例和3万例死亡。作为回应,建筑环境公司被迫面对不确定性,转变思维方式,并接受新的工作流程,以在面对城市和州的强制性居家令和宵禁时保持活力。这就需要建立新的内部文件分发程序。公司专注于通过提供信息、业务流程层次结构和新的行为准则来减轻客户的担忧并提高生产率。利用案例研究方法,跟踪了一家架构公司的这种演变。在大流行早期浪潮之前和之后进行的半结构化访谈澄清并核实了调查结果。参与者被问及探究性的后续问题,以更好地理解影响,特别是关于隐性知识的影响。公司的努力得到了优化,但隐性知识共享消失了。一旦这种形式的知识共享得到强调,参与者就会承认损失,并推测如何解决这一关键活动。©2021第37届ARCOM年会论文集,ARCOM 2021。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信