Food/Feed and Environmental Risk Assessment of Insect-resistant and Herbicide-tolerant Genetically Modified Maize 1507 x 59122 for Food and Feed Uses, Import and Processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15)

A. Andreassen, P. Brandtzaeg, M. Finne, A. Holck, A. Jevnaker, O. Junttila, Heidi Sjursen Konestabo, R. Meadow, A. Mikalsen, K. Nielsen, M. Sanden, V. Sipinen, H. Opsahl-Sorteberg, R. Vikse
{"title":"Food/Feed and Environmental Risk Assessment of Insect-resistant and Herbicide-tolerant Genetically Modified Maize 1507 x 59122 for Food and Feed Uses, Import and Processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15)","authors":"A. Andreassen, P. Brandtzaeg, M. Finne, A. Holck, A. Jevnaker, O. Junttila, Heidi Sjursen Konestabo, R. Meadow, A. Mikalsen, K. Nielsen, M. Sanden, V. Sipinen, H. Opsahl-Sorteberg, R. Vikse","doi":"10.9734/ejnfs/2019/v11i430164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In preparation for a legal implementation of EU-regulation 1829/2003, the Norwegian Environment Agency has requested the Norwegian Food Safety Authority to give final opinions on all genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation 1829/2003/EC within the Authority’s sectorial responsibility. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore, by letter dated 13 February 2013 (ref. 2012/150202), requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to carry out scientific risk assessments of 39 GMOs and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union. The request covers scope(s) relevant to the Gene Technology Act. The request does not cover GMOs that VKM already has conducted its final risk assessments on. However, the Agency requests VKM to consider whether updates or other changes to earlier submitted assessments are necessary. \n The insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507 x 59122 from Dow AgroSciences and Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. is approved under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 for food and feed uses, import and processing since 28 July 2010 (Commission Decision 2010/432/EC).  \n Genetically modified maize 1507 x 59122 has previously been risk assessed by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), commissioned by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority and the Norwegian Environment Agency related to the EFSAs public hearing of the applications EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15 and EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/28 in 2007 (VKM 2007a, 2008a). In addition, 1507 x 59122 has been evaluated by the VKM GMO Panel as single events and as a component of several stacked GM maize events (VKM 2004, VKM 2005a,b, VKM 2007b,c, VKM 2008b,c, VKM 2009a,b, VKM 2012). The risk assessment of the maize 1507 x 59122 is based on information provided by the applicant in the applications EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15 and EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/28, and scientific comments from EFSA and other member states made available on the EFSA website GMO Extranet. The risk assessment also considered other peer-reviewed scientific literature as relevant.   \n The VKM GMO Panel has evaluated 1507 x 59122 with reference to its intended uses in the European Economic Area (EEA), and according to the principles described in the Norwegian Food Act, the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act, Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety has also decided to take account of the appropriate principles described in the EFSA guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed (EFSA 2011a), the environmental risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2010) and the selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2011b).  \n The scientific risk assessment of maize 1507 x 59122 include molecular characterisation of the inserted DNA and expression of novel proteins, comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics, nutritional assessments, toxicology and allergenicity, unintended effects on plant fitness, potential for gene transfer, interactions between the GM plant and target and non-target organisms, effects on biogeochemical processes.  \n It is emphasized that the VKM mandate does not include assessments of contribution to sustainable development, societal utility and ethical considerations, according to the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and Regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act. These considerations are therefore not part of the risk assessment provided by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms.  \n The genetically modified maize stack 1507 x 59122 was produced by conventional breeding between inbred lines of maize containing the 1507 and 59122 events. The hybrid was developed to provide protection against certain lepidopteran and coleopteran target pests, and to confer tolerance to glufosinate-ammonium herbicides. \n Molecular Characterisation: \n As conventional breeding methods were used in the production of maize 1507 x 59122, no additional genetic modification was involved. Southern and PCR analyses demonstrated that the recombinant insert in the single 1507 and 59122 events were retained in maize stack 1507 x 59122. Genetic stability of the inserts has been demonstrated in the parental lines 1507 and 59122. Phenotypic analyses demonstrated stability of the insect resistance and herbicide tolerance traits in the hybrid. The expression levels of Cry1F, Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 and PAT proteins in seeds and forage were considered comparable with those in the single events. \n Comparative Assessment: \n rative analyses of data from field trials located at representative sites and environments in the USA and Europe indicate that maize stack 1507 x 59122 is compositionally, agronomically and phenotypically equivalent to its conventional counterpart, with the exception of the lepidopteran and coleopteran-protection traits and herbicide tolerance, conferred by the expression of the Cry1F, Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 and PAT proteins. Based on the assessment of available data, the VKM GMO Panel is of the opinion that conventional crossing of maize 1507 and 59122 to produce the hybrid 1507 x 59122 does not result in interactions that cause compositional, agronomic and phenotypic changes that would raise safety concerns.  \n Food and Feed Risk Assessment: \n Whole food feeding studies in rats and broilers indicate that maize 1507 x 59122 is nutritionally comparable to conventional maize. Bioinformatics analyses have not disclosed expression of any known ORFs in the parental maize events, and none of the newly expressed proteins show resemblance to any known toxins or IgE allergens. None of the proteins have been reported to cause IgE mediated allergic reactions. Some studies have, however, indicated a potential role of Cry-proteins as adjuvants in allergic reactions. \n Acute and repeated toxicity tests in rodents have not indicated toxic effects of the newly expressed proteins. However, these tests do not provide any additional information about possible adverse effects of maize 1507 x 59122.   \n Based on the current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that 1507 x 59122 maize is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties, and that it is unlikely that newly expressed proteins introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food and feed derived from maize 1507 x 59122 compared to conventional maize. \n Environmental Risk Assessment: \n The scope of the application EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15 includes import and processing of maize 1507 x 59122 for food and feed uses. Considering the intended uses of maize 1507 x 59122, excluding cultivation, the environmental risk assessment is concerned with accidental release into the environment of viable grains during transportation and processing, and indirect exposure, mainly through manure and faeces from animals fed grains from maize 1507 x 59122.  \n Maize 1507 x 59122 has no altered survival, multiplication or dissemination characteristics, and there are no indications of an increased likelihood of spread and establishment of feral maize plants in the case of accidental release into the environment of seeds from maize 1507 x 59122. Maize is the only representative of the genus Zea in Europe, and there are no cross-compatible wild or weedy relatives outside cultivation. The VKM GMO Panel considers the risk of gene flow from occasional feral GM maize plants to conventional maize varieties to be negligible in Norway. Considering the intended use as food and feed, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment are not considered by the GMO Panel to be an issue. \n Overall Conclusion: \n The VKM GMO Panel has not identified toxic or altered nutritional properties of maize 1507 x 59122 or its processed products compared to conventional maize. Based on current knowledge, it is also unlikely that the Cry1F, Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 proteins will increase the allergenic potential of food and feed derived from maize 1507 x 59122 compared to conventional maize varieties. The VKM GMO Panel likewise concludes that maize 1507 x 59122, based on current knowledge, is comparable to conventional maize varieties concerning environmental risk in Norway with the intended usage.","PeriodicalId":11994,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2019/v11i430164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In preparation for a legal implementation of EU-regulation 1829/2003, the Norwegian Environment Agency has requested the Norwegian Food Safety Authority to give final opinions on all genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation 1829/2003/EC within the Authority’s sectorial responsibility. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore, by letter dated 13 February 2013 (ref. 2012/150202), requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to carry out scientific risk assessments of 39 GMOs and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union. The request covers scope(s) relevant to the Gene Technology Act. The request does not cover GMOs that VKM already has conducted its final risk assessments on. However, the Agency requests VKM to consider whether updates or other changes to earlier submitted assessments are necessary.  The insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507 x 59122 from Dow AgroSciences and Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. is approved under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 for food and feed uses, import and processing since 28 July 2010 (Commission Decision 2010/432/EC).   Genetically modified maize 1507 x 59122 has previously been risk assessed by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), commissioned by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority and the Norwegian Environment Agency related to the EFSAs public hearing of the applications EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15 and EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/28 in 2007 (VKM 2007a, 2008a). In addition, 1507 x 59122 has been evaluated by the VKM GMO Panel as single events and as a component of several stacked GM maize events (VKM 2004, VKM 2005a,b, VKM 2007b,c, VKM 2008b,c, VKM 2009a,b, VKM 2012). The risk assessment of the maize 1507 x 59122 is based on information provided by the applicant in the applications EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15 and EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/28, and scientific comments from EFSA and other member states made available on the EFSA website GMO Extranet. The risk assessment also considered other peer-reviewed scientific literature as relevant.    The VKM GMO Panel has evaluated 1507 x 59122 with reference to its intended uses in the European Economic Area (EEA), and according to the principles described in the Norwegian Food Act, the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act, Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety has also decided to take account of the appropriate principles described in the EFSA guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed (EFSA 2011a), the environmental risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2010) and the selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2011b).   The scientific risk assessment of maize 1507 x 59122 include molecular characterisation of the inserted DNA and expression of novel proteins, comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics, nutritional assessments, toxicology and allergenicity, unintended effects on plant fitness, potential for gene transfer, interactions between the GM plant and target and non-target organisms, effects on biogeochemical processes.   It is emphasized that the VKM mandate does not include assessments of contribution to sustainable development, societal utility and ethical considerations, according to the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and Regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act. These considerations are therefore not part of the risk assessment provided by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms.   The genetically modified maize stack 1507 x 59122 was produced by conventional breeding between inbred lines of maize containing the 1507 and 59122 events. The hybrid was developed to provide protection against certain lepidopteran and coleopteran target pests, and to confer tolerance to glufosinate-ammonium herbicides.  Molecular Characterisation:  As conventional breeding methods were used in the production of maize 1507 x 59122, no additional genetic modification was involved. Southern and PCR analyses demonstrated that the recombinant insert in the single 1507 and 59122 events were retained in maize stack 1507 x 59122. Genetic stability of the inserts has been demonstrated in the parental lines 1507 and 59122. Phenotypic analyses demonstrated stability of the insect resistance and herbicide tolerance traits in the hybrid. The expression levels of Cry1F, Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 and PAT proteins in seeds and forage were considered comparable with those in the single events.  Comparative Assessment:  rative analyses of data from field trials located at representative sites and environments in the USA and Europe indicate that maize stack 1507 x 59122 is compositionally, agronomically and phenotypically equivalent to its conventional counterpart, with the exception of the lepidopteran and coleopteran-protection traits and herbicide tolerance, conferred by the expression of the Cry1F, Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 and PAT proteins. Based on the assessment of available data, the VKM GMO Panel is of the opinion that conventional crossing of maize 1507 and 59122 to produce the hybrid 1507 x 59122 does not result in interactions that cause compositional, agronomic and phenotypic changes that would raise safety concerns.   Food and Feed Risk Assessment:  Whole food feeding studies in rats and broilers indicate that maize 1507 x 59122 is nutritionally comparable to conventional maize. Bioinformatics analyses have not disclosed expression of any known ORFs in the parental maize events, and none of the newly expressed proteins show resemblance to any known toxins or IgE allergens. None of the proteins have been reported to cause IgE mediated allergic reactions. Some studies have, however, indicated a potential role of Cry-proteins as adjuvants in allergic reactions.  Acute and repeated toxicity tests in rodents have not indicated toxic effects of the newly expressed proteins. However, these tests do not provide any additional information about possible adverse effects of maize 1507 x 59122.    Based on the current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that 1507 x 59122 maize is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties, and that it is unlikely that newly expressed proteins introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food and feed derived from maize 1507 x 59122 compared to conventional maize.  Environmental Risk Assessment:  The scope of the application EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15 includes import and processing of maize 1507 x 59122 for food and feed uses. Considering the intended uses of maize 1507 x 59122, excluding cultivation, the environmental risk assessment is concerned with accidental release into the environment of viable grains during transportation and processing, and indirect exposure, mainly through manure and faeces from animals fed grains from maize 1507 x 59122.   Maize 1507 x 59122 has no altered survival, multiplication or dissemination characteristics, and there are no indications of an increased likelihood of spread and establishment of feral maize plants in the case of accidental release into the environment of seeds from maize 1507 x 59122. Maize is the only representative of the genus Zea in Europe, and there are no cross-compatible wild or weedy relatives outside cultivation. The VKM GMO Panel considers the risk of gene flow from occasional feral GM maize plants to conventional maize varieties to be negligible in Norway. Considering the intended use as food and feed, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment are not considered by the GMO Panel to be an issue.  Overall Conclusion:  The VKM GMO Panel has not identified toxic or altered nutritional properties of maize 1507 x 59122 or its processed products compared to conventional maize. Based on current knowledge, it is also unlikely that the Cry1F, Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 proteins will increase the allergenic potential of food and feed derived from maize 1507 x 59122 compared to conventional maize varieties. The VKM GMO Panel likewise concludes that maize 1507 x 59122, based on current knowledge, is comparable to conventional maize varieties concerning environmental risk in Norway with the intended usage.
根据法规(EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15)对用于食品和饲料、进口和加工的抗虫和耐除草剂转基因玉米1507 x 59122的食品/饲料和环境风险评估
为了准备在法律上实施欧盟第1829/2003号法规,挪威环境署已要求挪威食品安全局就欧盟根据第2001/18/EC号指令或第1829/2003/EC号法规授权的所有转基因生物(GMOs)和含有或由转基因生物组成的产品给出最终意见。因此,挪威食品安全局于2013年2月13日致函(ref. 2012/150202),要求挪威食品安全科学委员会(VKM)对欧盟授权的39种转基因生物和含有或由转基因生物组成的产品进行科学风险评估。该请求涵盖了与《基因技术法案》相关的范围。该请求不包括VKM已经进行了最终风险评估的转基因生物。但是,原子能机构请VKM考虑是否有必要对先前提交的评估进行更新或其他修改。由陶氏农业科学公司和先锋杂交国际公司共同开发的抗虫和抗除草剂转基因玉米1507 x 59122,根据法规(EC) No 1829/2003,自2010年7月28日起被批准用于食品和饲料用途、进口和加工(委员会决定2010/432/EC)。转基因玉米1507 x 59122此前已由挪威食品安全局和挪威环境署委托的VKM转基因生物小组(GMO)进行了风险评估,该小组与2007年EFSA对申请EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15和EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/28的公开听证会有关(VKM 2007a, 2008a)。此外,1507 x 59122已被VKM转基因生物小组评估为单一事件和几个堆叠转基因玉米事件的组成部分(VKM 2004, VKM 2005a,b, VKM 2007b,c, VKM 2008b,c, VKM 2009a,b, VKM 2012)。玉米1507 x 59122的风险评估是基于申请人在申请EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/15和EFSA/GMO/NL/2005/28中提供的信息,以及欧洲食品安全局和其他成员国在欧洲食品安全局网站GMO Extranet上提供的科学评论。风险评估还考虑了其他同行评审的相关科学文献。VKM转基因生物小组参照1507 x 59122在欧洲经济区(EEA)的预期用途,根据挪威食品法案、挪威基因技术法案、基因技术法案、关于转基因生物故意释放到环境中的指令2001/18/EC、转基因食品和饲料法规(EC) No 1829/2003所述原则,对其进行了评估。挪威食品安全科学委员会还决定考虑欧洲食品安全局转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料风险评估指南(EFSA 2011a)、转基因植物环境风险评估指南(EFSA 2010)和转基因植物风险评估比较物选择指南(EFSA 2011b)中所述的适当原则。玉米1507 x 59122的科学风险评估包括插入DNA的分子特征和新蛋白质的表达,农艺和表型特征的比较评估,营养评估,毒理学和过敏原性,对植物适应性的意外影响,基因转移的潜力,转基因植物与目标和非目标生物之间的相互作用,对生物地球化学过程的影响。需要强调的是,根据挪威基因技术法案和与基因技术法案相关的影响评估法规,VKM任务不包括对可持续发展、社会效用和伦理考虑的贡献评估。因此,这些考虑因素不属于VKM转基因生物小组提供的风险评估的一部分。转基因玉米堆1507 x 59122是在含有1507和59122事件的玉米自交系之间通过常规育种产生的。该杂交品种对某些鳞翅目和鞘翅目害虫具有保护作用,并对草铵膦除草剂具有耐受性。分子特性:由于在玉米1507 x 59122的生产中使用了常规育种方法,因此没有涉及额外的基因改造。Southern分析和PCR分析表明,1507和59122事件中的重组插入物在1507 × 59122玉米堆中被保留。在亲本1507和59122中证实了插入物的遗传稳定性。表型分析表明,杂种抗虫、耐除草剂性状稳定。Cry1F、Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1和PAT蛋白在种子和饲料中的表达水平被认为与单一事件中的表达水平相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信