Evaluation of Three Hemoglobin Estimation Methods for Screening Blood Donors: An Experience in a South Indian Hospital

Jhansi Priya Gaddam Harikrishna, Yashovardhan Araveti, Amulya Boddapati
{"title":"Evaluation of Three Hemoglobin Estimation Methods for Screening Blood Donors: An Experience in a South Indian Hospital","authors":"Jhansi Priya Gaddam Harikrishna, Yashovardhan Araveti, Amulya Boddapati","doi":"10.52547/rabms.8.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aims : Hemoglobin (Hb) estimation is one of the mandatory tests should be carried out on all blood donors before accepting for blood donation to prevent collecting blood samples from anemic donors. Presently various methods are available for pre-donation screening of donor hemoglobin. Total Hb concentration is calculated from measured absorbance at multiple wavelengths. In this study we reviewed the performance of Compolab TS with automated SYSMEX XN 1000i hematology analyzer and with standard cyanmethemoglobin method. Materials & Methods : This is a prospective study carried out in the department of Transfusion Medicine, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, India. A total of 466 blood donors were screened and evaluated for hemoglobin estimation by three different methods. Comparison and their test performances were evaluated by analysis of coefficients of variation (CV), linear regression, and mean differences, using SPSS Software version 20.0. Results : There was no difference between the mean Hb determinations. The CVs for three methods Compolab TS, 0Coulter, and Cyanmethemoglobin methods were 0.71%, 0.44%, and 0.85%, respectively. Compolab TS and Coulter showed best agreement and the Cyanmethemoglobin showed lower determination rate compared to both the Coulter and Compolab TS tests. However, pair methods involving Cyanmethemoglobin seem to narrower limits of agreement (± 0.1636 and ± 0.2152) than Compolab TS and Coulter combination (± 0.2730). Conclusion : Estimation of Hb by Compolab TS is rapid, simple and easy and showed good agreement with the standard methods.","PeriodicalId":16970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/rabms.8.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims : Hemoglobin (Hb) estimation is one of the mandatory tests should be carried out on all blood donors before accepting for blood donation to prevent collecting blood samples from anemic donors. Presently various methods are available for pre-donation screening of donor hemoglobin. Total Hb concentration is calculated from measured absorbance at multiple wavelengths. In this study we reviewed the performance of Compolab TS with automated SYSMEX XN 1000i hematology analyzer and with standard cyanmethemoglobin method. Materials & Methods : This is a prospective study carried out in the department of Transfusion Medicine, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, India. A total of 466 blood donors were screened and evaluated for hemoglobin estimation by three different methods. Comparison and their test performances were evaluated by analysis of coefficients of variation (CV), linear regression, and mean differences, using SPSS Software version 20.0. Results : There was no difference between the mean Hb determinations. The CVs for three methods Compolab TS, 0Coulter, and Cyanmethemoglobin methods were 0.71%, 0.44%, and 0.85%, respectively. Compolab TS and Coulter showed best agreement and the Cyanmethemoglobin showed lower determination rate compared to both the Coulter and Compolab TS tests. However, pair methods involving Cyanmethemoglobin seem to narrower limits of agreement (± 0.1636 and ± 0.2152) than Compolab TS and Coulter combination (± 0.2730). Conclusion : Estimation of Hb by Compolab TS is rapid, simple and easy and showed good agreement with the standard methods.
三种血红蛋白评估方法筛选献血者:在南印度医院的经验
背景与目的:血红蛋白(Hb)检测是所有献血者接受献血前必须进行的强制性检测之一,以防止从贫血献血者中采集血样。目前有多种方法可用于捐献前筛查供体血红蛋白。总血红蛋白浓度是计算从测量吸光度在多个波长。在这项研究中,我们回顾了Compolab TS与自动SYSMEX xn1000i血液学分析仪和标准氰高铁血红蛋白方法的性能。材料与方法:这是一项在印度Narayana医学院和医院输血医学系进行的前瞻性研究。通过三种不同的方法对466名献血者进行了筛查和血红蛋白评估。采用SPSS软件20.0版,通过变异系数(CV)分析、线性回归分析和均值差异分析,比较两组的检验效果。结果:两组血红蛋白测定平均值无差异。Compolab TS法、0Coulter法和Cyanmethemoglobin法的CVs分别为0.71%、0.44%和0.85%。Compolab TS和Coulter方法的一致性最好,氰高铁血红蛋白的检出率较Coulter和Compolab TS方法低。然而,涉及氰高铁血红蛋白的配对方法似乎比Compolab TS和Coulter组合(±0.2730)的一致性范围更窄(±0.1636和±0.2152)。结论:Compolab TS法测定Hb快速、简便,与标准方法吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信