Implementing a discharge process for patients undergoing elective surgery: Rapid review

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
Maria J.C. Teixeira , Ma'ali Khouri , Evangeline Martinez , Suzanne Bench
{"title":"Implementing a discharge process for patients undergoing elective surgery: Rapid review","authors":"Maria J.C. Teixeira ,&nbsp;Ma'ali Khouri ,&nbsp;Evangeline Martinez ,&nbsp;Suzanne Bench","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Hospital discharge<span> is a ‘vulnerable stage’ in care. A delayed, inappropriate or poorly planned discharge increases hazards and costs, inhibiting recovery, and often leading to unplanned readmission. New discharge processes could boost practice, reduce the length of stay, and, consequently, reduce costs and improve patients' </span></span>quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To identify technology based interventions that have been implemented to facilitate a safe and timely discharge procedure after elective surgery, and to describe implementation barriers and facilitators and patient satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>This rapid review followed a restricted systematic review<span> framework, searching Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL<span>, PsychINFO, and </span></span></span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg>. for relevant studies published from 2015 to 2021 in English.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven studies were included. Most interventions were machine-learning-based, and only one study reported patient involvement. Effective leadership, team work and communication were stated as implementation facilitators. The main barriers to implementation were: lack of support from leaders, poor clinical documentation, resistance to change, and financial and logistical concerns. None of the studies evaluated patient satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings highlight factors that support the implementation of technology based interventions aimed at a safe and timely discharge process following elective surgery. Nurses play an important role in the provision of information, and in the development and implementation of discharge processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124123000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hospital discharge is a ‘vulnerable stage’ in care. A delayed, inappropriate or poorly planned discharge increases hazards and costs, inhibiting recovery, and often leading to unplanned readmission. New discharge processes could boost practice, reduce the length of stay, and, consequently, reduce costs and improve patients' quality of life.

Aim

To identify technology based interventions that have been implemented to facilitate a safe and timely discharge procedure after elective surgery, and to describe implementation barriers and facilitators and patient satisfaction.

Method

This rapid review followed a restricted systematic review framework, searching Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov. for relevant studies published from 2015 to 2021 in English.

Results

Eleven studies were included. Most interventions were machine-learning-based, and only one study reported patient involvement. Effective leadership, team work and communication were stated as implementation facilitators. The main barriers to implementation were: lack of support from leaders, poor clinical documentation, resistance to change, and financial and logistical concerns. None of the studies evaluated patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

Findings highlight factors that support the implementation of technology based interventions aimed at a safe and timely discharge process following elective surgery. Nurses play an important role in the provision of information, and in the development and implementation of discharge processes.

实施出院程序的病人接受择期手术:快速回顾
出院是护理中的“脆弱阶段”。延迟、不适当或计划不周的出院会增加危险和成本,抑制康复,并经常导致意外再入院。新的出院流程可以促进实践,缩短住院时间,从而降低成本,提高患者的生活质量。目的确定已实施的基于技术的干预措施,以促进择期手术后安全及时的出院程序,并描述实施障碍、促进因素和患者满意度。方法采用有限的系统评价框架,检索Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsychINFO和ClinicalTrials.gov。查阅2015年至2021年发表的相关英文研究。结果共纳入6项研究。大多数干预都是基于机器学习的,只有一项研究报告了患者的参与。有效的领导、团队合作和沟通被认为是促进实施的因素。实施的主要障碍是:缺乏领导的支持、临床文件不完善、对变革的抵制以及财政和后勤问题。没有一项研究评估患者满意度。结论:研究结果强调了支持实施基于技术的干预措施的因素,旨在实现择期手术后安全和及时的出院过程。护士在提供信息、制定和实施出院流程方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信