(Dis) Empowering Trans People: Depathologization Through Treatment Guidelines and Provider Decision-Making

Jodie M. Dewey, Emma Oppenheim, D. Watson
{"title":"(Dis) Empowering Trans People: Depathologization Through Treatment Guidelines and Provider Decision-Making","authors":"Jodie M. Dewey, Emma Oppenheim, D. Watson","doi":"10.1177/01605976231162341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To depathologize transgender (trans) healthcare, revisions have been made to two documents used in the treatment of trans people. First, the 7th Version of the Standards of Care (SOC-7) removed a lengthy therapeutic relationship and real-life experience (RLE), replacing these with a gender assessment. The second was a shift in language from Gender Identity Disorder to Gender Dysphoria in the 5th Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), as well as its removal from the chapter on ‘sexual dysfunctions and paraphilias’. Despite changes, trans healthcare remains stigmatizing and gatekept. Through qualitative interviews with 20 U.S.-based health professionals, we expand current knowledge of the shifting treatment approaches for those seeking gender-affirming medical services. Data show that despite progressive document changes, providers continue to place the burden on patients to fit within a sex/gender dichotomous system and to prove mental stability and decision-making competency to access what are increasingly considered life-saving treatments. We illuminate resultant health disparities that can emerge when providers perceive trans people in need of their education and mental health support and advocate a move away from the current medicalized process towards a healthcare model situated in trans peoples' own lived experience.","PeriodicalId":81481,"journal":{"name":"Humanity & society","volume":"51 1","pages":"342 - 364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanity & society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01605976231162341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To depathologize transgender (trans) healthcare, revisions have been made to two documents used in the treatment of trans people. First, the 7th Version of the Standards of Care (SOC-7) removed a lengthy therapeutic relationship and real-life experience (RLE), replacing these with a gender assessment. The second was a shift in language from Gender Identity Disorder to Gender Dysphoria in the 5th Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), as well as its removal from the chapter on ‘sexual dysfunctions and paraphilias’. Despite changes, trans healthcare remains stigmatizing and gatekept. Through qualitative interviews with 20 U.S.-based health professionals, we expand current knowledge of the shifting treatment approaches for those seeking gender-affirming medical services. Data show that despite progressive document changes, providers continue to place the burden on patients to fit within a sex/gender dichotomous system and to prove mental stability and decision-making competency to access what are increasingly considered life-saving treatments. We illuminate resultant health disparities that can emerge when providers perceive trans people in need of their education and mental health support and advocate a move away from the current medicalized process towards a healthcare model situated in trans peoples' own lived experience.
授权跨性别者:通过治疗指南和提供者决策去病理化
为了将跨性别(trans)医疗保健去病理性化,对两份用于治疗跨性别者的文件进行了修订。首先,第七版护理标准(SOC-7)删除了冗长的治疗关系和现实生活经验(RLE),代之以性别评估。第二是在第五版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)中将“性别认同障碍”(Gender Identity Disorder)改为“性别不安”(Gender Dysphoria),并将其从“性功能障碍和性反常”一章中删除。尽管发生了变化,跨性别医疗保健仍然被污名化和封锁。通过对20名美国卫生专业人员的定性访谈,我们扩大了目前对寻求性别肯定医疗服务的人正在转变的治疗方法的了解。数据显示,尽管文件有了长足的变化,但医疗服务提供者继续将负担放在患者身上,以适应性别/性别二分法体系,并证明精神稳定和决策能力,以获得日益被视为救命的治疗。我们阐明了当提供者认为跨性别者需要他们的教育和心理健康支持时,可能出现的健康差异,并倡导从目前的医疗过程转向基于跨性别者自己生活经验的医疗模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信