Determinants of the acceptability of university agricultural extension in the Gauteng province of South Africa

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Antwi, M.M.S. Maake, Matome Moshobane, S. Maake, María Luisa, Escudero Gilete
{"title":"Determinants of the acceptability of university agricultural extension in the Gauteng province of South Africa","authors":"M. Antwi, M.M.S. Maake, Matome Moshobane, S. Maake, María Luisa, Escudero Gilete","doi":"10.1080/23311932.2023.2249951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Universities offering agricultural programmes have the potential to complement public agricultural extension and advisory services because they are at the centre of knowledge generation—through research, teaching and community outreach programmes. The purpose of this study was to determine farmers’ acceptability of university agricultural extension and the factors influencing their decision. Using probability sampling, a sample of 442 participants from Gauteng Province were selected for inclusion in the survey to collect data through face-to-face interviews. Primary data were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) found in IBM SPSS version 27. The results showed that a significant proportion of the respondents favoured the introduction of university agricultural extension to complement public extension services as part of a pluralistic extension system. Furthermore, most of the farmers were willing to pay for extension services and were optimistic about the perceived benefits of associating with universities. The exploratory factor analysis revealed that access to research resources, improved extension services and training, and diffusion of university research were the three factors underlying the acceptability of university agricultural extension. It is suggested that a formal framework for pluralistic extension system should be developed through a participatory process that involves all stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":10521,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Food & Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Food & Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2249951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Universities offering agricultural programmes have the potential to complement public agricultural extension and advisory services because they are at the centre of knowledge generation—through research, teaching and community outreach programmes. The purpose of this study was to determine farmers’ acceptability of university agricultural extension and the factors influencing their decision. Using probability sampling, a sample of 442 participants from Gauteng Province were selected for inclusion in the survey to collect data through face-to-face interviews. Primary data were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) found in IBM SPSS version 27. The results showed that a significant proportion of the respondents favoured the introduction of university agricultural extension to complement public extension services as part of a pluralistic extension system. Furthermore, most of the farmers were willing to pay for extension services and were optimistic about the perceived benefits of associating with universities. The exploratory factor analysis revealed that access to research resources, improved extension services and training, and diffusion of university research were the three factors underlying the acceptability of university agricultural extension. It is suggested that a formal framework for pluralistic extension system should be developed through a participatory process that involves all stakeholders.
南非豪登省大学农业推广可接受性的决定因素
提供农业项目的大学有潜力补充公共农业推广和咨询服务,因为它们是知识生成的中心——通过研究、教学和社区外展项目。本研究的目的是确定农民对大学农业推广的接受程度及其影响因素。采用概率抽样的方法,从豪登省选取442名参与者纳入调查,通过面对面访谈的方式收集数据。主要数据采用IBM SPSS version 27中的描述性统计分析和探索性因子分析(EFA)。结果表明,相当大比例的受访者赞成引入大学农业推广,以补充公共推广服务,作为多元化推广系统的一部分。此外,大多数农民愿意为推广服务付费,并对与大学合作的预期利益持乐观态度。探索性因子分析表明,研究资源的获取、推广服务和培训的改善以及大学研究的扩散是影响大学农业推广可接受性的三个因素。建议通过所有利益攸关方参与的进程,制定多元化推广制度的正式框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Cogent Food & Agriculture AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信