Teaching L2 writing through the use of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL)

Setyo Prasiyanto Cahyono
{"title":"Teaching L2 writing through the use of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL)","authors":"Setyo Prasiyanto Cahyono","doi":"10.25170/IJELT.V13I1.1179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe the implementation of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) of the textual grammar of message (or textual meaning) to enhance students’ critical response to the text they created. For EFL learners, transferring their ideas into writing is already a difficult task and that to give a response to the text they read or write critically is even more challenging. This study intends to approach the teaching of writing by adopting Halliday’s idea of textual meaning and Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). The students were introduced to samples of hortatory texts and trained to analyze the thematic patterns and grammatical cohesive devices. It is hoped that by training them to understand textual grammar (including thematic progression and cohesion), students (as readers and writers) are able to build their critical thinking skill and evaluate their own works. After the training, students were assigned to produce a hortatory text and to do self-editing activity. The data of this study were the twenty students’ hortatory texts which was analyzed using a framework of textual meaning proposed by Butt (2000). The analysis of the students texts show that most students were able to self-edit their own writings and edit their peer’s writing using thematic progression and cohesive devices. Students adopted skills of using both strategies in creating cohesiveness in their writing. In addition, students also produced critical response to the topic given through its theme and thematic displayed in the text analysis.","PeriodicalId":34238,"journal":{"name":"IJET Indonesian Journal of English Teaching","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJET Indonesian Journal of English Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/IJELT.V13I1.1179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study aims to describe the implementation of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) of the textual grammar of message (or textual meaning) to enhance students’ critical response to the text they created. For EFL learners, transferring their ideas into writing is already a difficult task and that to give a response to the text they read or write critically is even more challenging. This study intends to approach the teaching of writing by adopting Halliday’s idea of textual meaning and Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). The students were introduced to samples of hortatory texts and trained to analyze the thematic patterns and grammatical cohesive devices. It is hoped that by training them to understand textual grammar (including thematic progression and cohesion), students (as readers and writers) are able to build their critical thinking skill and evaluate their own works. After the training, students were assigned to produce a hortatory text and to do self-editing activity. The data of this study were the twenty students’ hortatory texts which was analyzed using a framework of textual meaning proposed by Butt (2000). The analysis of the students texts show that most students were able to self-edit their own writings and edit their peer’s writing using thematic progression and cohesive devices. Students adopted skills of using both strategies in creating cohesiveness in their writing. In addition, students also produced critical response to the topic given through its theme and thematic displayed in the text analysis.
运用系统功能语言学(SFL)教学第二语言写作
本研究旨在描述系统功能语言学(SFL)的信息语篇语法(或语篇意义)的实施,以提高学生对他们所创造的文本的批判性反应。对于英语学习者来说,将他们的想法转化为写作已经是一项艰巨的任务,而对他们读过或写过的文章做出批判性的回应则更具挑战性。本研究旨在运用韩礼德的语篇意义观和系统功能语言学来探讨写作教学。学生们被引入到提示语文本样本中,并训练他们分析主位模式和语法衔接手段。希望通过训练他们理解文本语法(包括主位推进和衔接),学生(作为读者和作者)能够建立他们的批判性思维技能,并评估自己的作品。训练结束后,学生们被要求编写一篇提示文本并进行自我编辑活动。本研究采用Butt(2000)提出的语篇意义框架对20名学生的训谕语篇进行分析。对学生文本的分析表明,大多数学生能够使用主位推进和衔接手段对自己的文章进行编辑,并对同伴的文章进行编辑。学生们运用这两种策略在写作中创造凝聚力。此外,学生还通过文本分析中所显示的主题和主题对所给出的主题做出批判性反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信