Prostate cancer screening: Continued controversies and novel biomarker advancements.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Atiyah Tidd-Johnson, Sneha Annie Sebastian, Edzel Lorraine Co, Munaza Afaq, Hansini Kochhar, Mona Sheikh, Arpit Mago, Sujan Poudel, John A Fernandez, Ivan D Rodriguez, Sanjay Razdan
{"title":"Prostate cancer screening: Continued controversies and novel biomarker advancements.","authors":"Atiyah Tidd-Johnson,&nbsp;Sneha Annie Sebastian,&nbsp;Edzel Lorraine Co,&nbsp;Munaza Afaq,&nbsp;Hansini Kochhar,&nbsp;Mona Sheikh,&nbsp;Arpit Mago,&nbsp;Sujan Poudel,&nbsp;John A Fernandez,&nbsp;Ivan D Rodriguez,&nbsp;Sanjay Razdan","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer (PCa) screening remains one of the most controversial topics in clinical and public health. Despite being the second most common cancer in men worldwide, recommendations for screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are unclear. Early detection and the resulting postscreening treatment lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of otherwise indolent cases. In addition, several unwanted harms are associated with PCa screening process. This literature review focuses on the limitations of PSA-specific PCa screening, reasons behind the screening controversy, and the novel biomarkers and advanced innovative methodologies that improve the limitations of traditional screening using PSA. With the verdict of whether or not to screen not yet unanimous, we hope to aid in resolution of the long-standing debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":"16 4","pages":"197-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/cc/curr-urol-16-197.PMC9875204.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) screening remains one of the most controversial topics in clinical and public health. Despite being the second most common cancer in men worldwide, recommendations for screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are unclear. Early detection and the resulting postscreening treatment lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of otherwise indolent cases. In addition, several unwanted harms are associated with PCa screening process. This literature review focuses on the limitations of PSA-specific PCa screening, reasons behind the screening controversy, and the novel biomarkers and advanced innovative methodologies that improve the limitations of traditional screening using PSA. With the verdict of whether or not to screen not yet unanimous, we hope to aid in resolution of the long-standing debate.

前列腺癌筛查:持续的争议和新的生物标志物进展。
前列腺癌(PCa)筛查仍然是临床和公共卫生中最具争议的话题之一。尽管前列腺癌是世界范围内男性中第二大常见癌症,但使用前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)进行筛查的建议尚不明确。早期发现和由此产生的筛查后治疗导致过度诊断和过度治疗其他惰性病例。此外,一些不必要的危害与前列腺癌筛选过程有关。本文综述了PSA特异性前列腺癌筛查的局限性,筛查争议背后的原因,以及新的生物标志物和先进的创新方法,这些方法改善了传统PSA筛查的局限性。由于是否筛选的裁决尚未达成一致,我们希望有助于解决长期以来的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信