Application of Defined Approaches to Assess Skin Sensitization Potency of Isothiazolinone Compounds.

Q2 Health Professions
Judy Strickland, David G Allen, Dori Germolec, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Victor J Johnson, Travis Gulledge, Jim Truax, Anna Lowit, Timothy Dole, Timothy McMahon, Melissa Panger, Judy Facey, Stephen Savage
{"title":"Application of Defined Approaches to Assess Skin Sensitization Potency of Isothiazolinone Compounds.","authors":"Judy Strickland,&nbsp;David G Allen,&nbsp;Dori Germolec,&nbsp;Nicole Kleinstreuer,&nbsp;Victor J Johnson,&nbsp;Travis Gulledge,&nbsp;Jim Truax,&nbsp;Anna Lowit,&nbsp;Timothy Dole,&nbsp;Timothy McMahon,&nbsp;Melissa Panger,&nbsp;Judy Facey,&nbsp;Stephen Savage","doi":"10.1089/aivt.2022.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Isothiazolinones (ITs) are widely used as antimicrobial preservatives in cosmetics and as additives for preservation of consumer and industrial products to control bacteria, fungi, and algae. Although they are effective biocides, they have the potential to produce skin irritation and sensitization, which poses a human health hazard. In this project, we evaluated nonanimal defined approaches (DAs) for skin sensitization that can provide point-of-departure estimates for use in quantitative risk assessment for ITs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The skin sensitization potential of six ITs was evaluated using three internationally harmonized nonanimal test methods: the direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens™, and the human cell line activation test. Results from these test methods were then applied to two versions of the Shiseido Artificial Neural Network DA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitization hazard or potency predictions were compared with those of the in vivo murine local lymph node assay (LLNA). The nonanimal methods produced skin sensitization hazard and potency classifications concordant with those of the LLNA. EC3 values (the estimated concentration needed to produce a stimulation index of three, the threshold positive response) generated by the DAs had less variability than LLNA EC3 values, and confidence limits from the DAs overlapped those of the LLNA EC3 for most substances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of <i>in silico</i> models to <i>in chemico</i> and in vitro skin sensitization data is a promising data integration procedure for DAs to support hazard and potency classification and quantitative risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":37448,"journal":{"name":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","volume":"8 4","pages":"117-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9814110/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aivt.2022.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Isothiazolinones (ITs) are widely used as antimicrobial preservatives in cosmetics and as additives for preservation of consumer and industrial products to control bacteria, fungi, and algae. Although they are effective biocides, they have the potential to produce skin irritation and sensitization, which poses a human health hazard. In this project, we evaluated nonanimal defined approaches (DAs) for skin sensitization that can provide point-of-departure estimates for use in quantitative risk assessment for ITs.

Materials and methods: The skin sensitization potential of six ITs was evaluated using three internationally harmonized nonanimal test methods: the direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens™, and the human cell line activation test. Results from these test methods were then applied to two versions of the Shiseido Artificial Neural Network DA.

Results: Sensitization hazard or potency predictions were compared with those of the in vivo murine local lymph node assay (LLNA). The nonanimal methods produced skin sensitization hazard and potency classifications concordant with those of the LLNA. EC3 values (the estimated concentration needed to produce a stimulation index of three, the threshold positive response) generated by the DAs had less variability than LLNA EC3 values, and confidence limits from the DAs overlapped those of the LLNA EC3 for most substances.

Conclusion: The application of in silico models to in chemico and in vitro skin sensitization data is a promising data integration procedure for DAs to support hazard and potency classification and quantitative risk assessment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

应用确定的方法评估异噻唑啉酮类化合物的皮肤致敏效力。
简介:异噻唑啉酮(ITs)广泛用作化妆品中的抗菌防腐剂,以及作为保存消费品和工业产品的添加剂,以控制细菌,真菌和藻类。虽然它们是有效的杀菌剂,但它们有可能产生皮肤刺激和致敏,从而对人体健康构成危害。在这个项目中,我们评估了非动物定义的皮肤致敏方法(DAs),该方法可以为ITs的定量风险评估提供出发点估计。材料和方法:使用三种国际统一的非动物试验方法评估六种ITs的皮肤致敏潜力:直接肽反应性试验、KeratinoSens™和人类细胞系激活试验。然后将这些测试方法的结果应用于两个版本的资生堂人工神经网络DA。结果:与小鼠体内局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)的致敏危险或效价预测结果进行了比较。非动物方法产生的皮肤致敏危险和效力分类与LLNA一致。DAs生成的EC3值(产生刺激指数为3,即阈值正反应所需的估计浓度)的变异性小于LLNA EC3值,并且对于大多数物质,DAs的置信限与LLNA EC3的置信限重叠。结论:将计算机模型应用于化学和体外皮肤致敏数据是一种很有前途的数据整合方法,可以支持DAs的危害和效力分类以及定量风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied In Vitro Toxicology
Applied In Vitro Toxicology Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Applied In Vitro Toxicology is a peer-reviewed journal providing the latest research on the application of alternative in vitro testing methods for predicting adverse effects in the pharmaceutical, chemical, and personal care industries. This Journal aims to address important issues facing the various chemical industries, including regulatory requirements; the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animal testing; new screening methods; evaluation of new cell and tissue models; and the most appropriate methods for assessing safety and satisfying regulatory demands. The Journal also delivers the latest views and opinions of developers of new models, end users of the models, academic laboratories that are inventing new tools, and regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe, Latin America, Australia and Asia. Applied In Vitro Toxicology is the journal that scientists involved with hazard identification and risk assessment will read to understand how new and existing in vitro methods are applied, and the questions for which these models provide answers. Applied In Vitro Toxicology coverage includes: -Applied in vitro toxicology industry standards -New technologies developed for applied in vitro toxicology -Data acquisition, cleaning, distribution, and best practices -Data protection, privacy, and policy -Business interests from research to product -The changing role of in vitro toxicology -Visualization and design principles of applied in vitro toxicology infrastructures -Physical interfaces and robotics -Opportunities around applied in vitro toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信