Extraordinary Conditions, Ordinary Realities and a Squandered Opportunity: Māori Social Imaginaries and Covid-19

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Miriama Aoake
{"title":"Extraordinary Conditions, Ordinary Realities and a Squandered Opportunity: Māori Social Imaginaries and Covid-19","authors":"Miriama Aoake","doi":"10.1080/00664677.2022.2122933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2020, the nationwide lockdown in Aotearoa/New Zealand offered a rare opportunity to re-configure power relations between Māori and the state. These extraordinary circumstances constituted an opportunity to direct an expansion of state power towards re-imagining inequitable outcomes for Māori. Across myriad fora, whānau [extended family] communicated their sustained desire for utu [reciprocity] in the relationship with the Crown; the recognition of our right to exercise tino rangatiratanga [absolute sovereignty] in the co-ordination and delivery of a distinct response to COVID-19. Survey data demonstrates an ongoing commitment from Māori to work towards a more socially cohesive future, one that prioritises care for those made vulnerable, protects te taiao [the environment], and one that shifts away from capitalism, individualism and greed [Houkamau, C., K. Dell, J. Newth, J. P. Mita, C. Sibley, T. Keelan, and T. Dunn. 2021. The Wellbeing of Māori Pre and Post Covid-19 Lockdown in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Auckland: Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga; University of Auckland.]. This momentum, real or perceived, soon waned. The ordinary realities Māori endured pre-pandemic have continued. Simultaneously however, Māori cling to mokopunatanga – a commitment to ensuring successive generations will flourish. Imagination is therefore not a thought exercise, but a set of deliberate, consistent desires in ‘pursuit of the possible’ [Tuhiwai Smith, L. 2018. “In Pursuit of the Possible: Indigenous Well-being (website).” http://mediacentre.maramatanga.ac.nz/content/pursuit-possible-indigenous-well-being, accessed 19 March, 2022]. In this article, I trace the desires of the Māori social imaginaries in practice through the state’s management of COVID-19. I argue that the state’s response failed to meet the urgent, everyday needs of Māori, a decision which has haemorrhaged beyond Māori communities into the national sphere. Using two case studies, I examine the broader social costs of squandering an extraordinary opportunity to re-imagine the ordinary, inequitable realities Māori endure.","PeriodicalId":45505,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Forum","volume":"1 1","pages":"234 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2022.2122933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In 2020, the nationwide lockdown in Aotearoa/New Zealand offered a rare opportunity to re-configure power relations between Māori and the state. These extraordinary circumstances constituted an opportunity to direct an expansion of state power towards re-imagining inequitable outcomes for Māori. Across myriad fora, whānau [extended family] communicated their sustained desire for utu [reciprocity] in the relationship with the Crown; the recognition of our right to exercise tino rangatiratanga [absolute sovereignty] in the co-ordination and delivery of a distinct response to COVID-19. Survey data demonstrates an ongoing commitment from Māori to work towards a more socially cohesive future, one that prioritises care for those made vulnerable, protects te taiao [the environment], and one that shifts away from capitalism, individualism and greed [Houkamau, C., K. Dell, J. Newth, J. P. Mita, C. Sibley, T. Keelan, and T. Dunn. 2021. The Wellbeing of Māori Pre and Post Covid-19 Lockdown in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Auckland: Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga; University of Auckland.]. This momentum, real or perceived, soon waned. The ordinary realities Māori endured pre-pandemic have continued. Simultaneously however, Māori cling to mokopunatanga – a commitment to ensuring successive generations will flourish. Imagination is therefore not a thought exercise, but a set of deliberate, consistent desires in ‘pursuit of the possible’ [Tuhiwai Smith, L. 2018. “In Pursuit of the Possible: Indigenous Well-being (website).” http://mediacentre.maramatanga.ac.nz/content/pursuit-possible-indigenous-well-being, accessed 19 March, 2022]. In this article, I trace the desires of the Māori social imaginaries in practice through the state’s management of COVID-19. I argue that the state’s response failed to meet the urgent, everyday needs of Māori, a decision which has haemorrhaged beyond Māori communities into the national sphere. Using two case studies, I examine the broader social costs of squandering an extraordinary opportunity to re-imagine the ordinary, inequitable realities Māori endure.
特殊条件、普通现实和被浪费的机会:Māori社会想象与Covid-19
2020年,新西兰奥特罗阿的全国封锁为重新配置Māori与国家之间的权力关系提供了难得的机会。这些特殊情况构成了一个机会,可以引导国家权力的扩张,重新设想Māori的不公平结果。通过无数的论坛,whānau[大家庭]传达了他们对与王室关系中互惠互利的持续渴望;承认我们有权在协调和提供独特的COVID-19应对措施方面行使绝对主权。调查数据表明,Māori正在致力于建设一个更具社会凝聚力的未来,一个优先照顾弱势群体、保护环境、远离资本主义、个人主义和贪婪的未来[Houkamau, C., K. Dell, J. Newth, J. P. Mita, C. Sibley, T. Keelan和T. Dunn. 2021]。新冠肺炎疫情前和后新西兰奥特罗阿封锁的健康状况Māori奥克兰:Ngā Pae o the Māramatanga;奥克兰大学。这种势头,无论是真实的还是感知的,很快就减弱了。大流行前经历过的普通现实Māori仍在继续。与此同时,Māori坚持mokopunatanga——确保后代繁荣昌盛的承诺。因此,想象不是一种思维练习,而是一组经过深思熟虑的、一致的“追求可能”的欲望[图希瓦伊·史密斯,L. 2018]。“追求可能:原住民的福祉”(网站)。[http://mediacentre.maramatanga.ac.nz/content/pursuit-possible-indigenous-well-being,访问日期为2022年3月19日]。在这篇文章中,我通过国家对COVID-19的管理来追踪Māori社会想象者在实践中的欲望。我认为,国家的反应未能满足Māori的紧急日常需求,这一决定已经从Māori社区蔓延到国家领域。通过两个案例研究,我考察了浪费一个非凡的机会来重新想象Māori忍受的普通、不公平的现实所带来的更广泛的社会成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anthropological Forum
Anthropological Forum ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Anthropological Forum is a journal of social anthropology and comparative sociology that was founded in 1963 and has a distinguished publication history. The journal provides a forum for both established and innovative approaches to anthropological research. A special section devoted to contributions on applied anthropology appears periodically. The editors are especially keen to publish new approaches based on ethnographic and theoretical work in the journal"s established areas of strength: Australian culture and society, Aboriginal Australia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信