Comparative Metastatic Rates in GEP Class 1A versus 1B Posterior Uveal Melanoma: Results Contrary to Expectations.

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1159/000526770
James J Augsburger, Cassandra C Skinner, Zelia M Correa
{"title":"Comparative Metastatic Rates in GEP Class 1A versus 1B Posterior Uveal Melanoma: Results Contrary to Expectations.","authors":"James J Augsburger,&nbsp;Cassandra C Skinner,&nbsp;Zelia M Correa","doi":"10.1159/000526770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine whether the metastatic rates in patients with gene expression profile (GEP) class 1A versus 1B posterior uveal malignant melanoma supported or contradicted predictions of very low metastatic rate in GEP 1A cases and moderate rate in GEP 1B cases.</p><p><strong>Patients/methods: </strong>164 patients with a cytopathologically confirmed primary posterior uveal malignant melanoma classified by GEP testing as class 1 (100 GEP 1A, 64 GEP 1B) were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier rates of metastasis were computed and plotted for the GEP class 1 subgroups. Median follow-up of patients who were still alive without metastasis on the date of data analysis was 100.5 months for the GEP 1A patients and 97.2 months for the GEP 1B patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The actuarial 5-year rate of uveal melanoma metastasis was 10.8% (std. error = 3.2%) in the GEP 1A patients versus 0% in the GEP 1B patients, and the actuarial 10-year rate of metastasis was 12.2% (std. error = 3.5%) in the GEP 1A patients versus 2.1% (std. error 2.1%) in the GEP 1B patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this retrospective single-center study cast doubt on the validity of the prognostic stratification of GEP class 1 posterior uveal malignant melanomas into very low risk (GEP 1A) versus intermediate risk (GEP 1B) of metastasis subgroups provided by the commercially available GEP test.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013492/pdf/oop-0008-0242.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the metastatic rates in patients with gene expression profile (GEP) class 1A versus 1B posterior uveal malignant melanoma supported or contradicted predictions of very low metastatic rate in GEP 1A cases and moderate rate in GEP 1B cases.

Patients/methods: 164 patients with a cytopathologically confirmed primary posterior uveal malignant melanoma classified by GEP testing as class 1 (100 GEP 1A, 64 GEP 1B) were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier rates of metastasis were computed and plotted for the GEP class 1 subgroups. Median follow-up of patients who were still alive without metastasis on the date of data analysis was 100.5 months for the GEP 1A patients and 97.2 months for the GEP 1B patients.

Results: The actuarial 5-year rate of uveal melanoma metastasis was 10.8% (std. error = 3.2%) in the GEP 1A patients versus 0% in the GEP 1B patients, and the actuarial 10-year rate of metastasis was 12.2% (std. error = 3.5%) in the GEP 1A patients versus 2.1% (std. error 2.1%) in the GEP 1B patients.

Conclusion: The results of this retrospective single-center study cast doubt on the validity of the prognostic stratification of GEP class 1 posterior uveal malignant melanomas into very low risk (GEP 1A) versus intermediate risk (GEP 1B) of metastasis subgroups provided by the commercially available GEP test.

分享
查看原文
GEP 1A类与1B类后葡萄膜黑色素瘤的转移率比较:结果与预期相反。
目的:本研究的目的是确定基因表达谱(GEP) 1A类与1B类后葡萄膜恶性黑色素瘤患者的转移率是否支持或矛盾GEP 1A病例的极低转移率和GEP 1B病例的中等转移率的预测。患者/方法:164例经细胞病理学证实的原发性葡萄膜后恶性黑色素瘤,经GEP检测为1级(100例GEP 1A, 64例GEP 1B)。计算并绘制GEP 1类亚组的Kaplan-Meier转移率。在数据分析之日,GEP 1A患者的中位随访时间为100.5个月,而GEP 1B患者的中位随访时间为97.2个月。结果:GEP 1A患者5年葡萄膜黑色素瘤转移精算率为10.8% (std误差= 3.2%),而GEP 1B患者为0%;GEP 1A患者10年葡萄膜黑色素瘤转移精算率为12.2% (std误差= 3.5%),而GEP 1B患者10年葡萄膜黑色素瘤转移精算率为2.1% (std误差为2.1%)。结论:这项回顾性单中心研究的结果对市场上可获得的GEP测试提供的极低风险(GEP 1A)和中等风险(GEP 1B)转移亚组的GEP 1级后葡萄膜恶性黑色素瘤预后分层的有效性提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信