Investigation of Smoked Beef Brisket Palatability from Three USDA Quality Grades

W. T. Fletcher, A. Garmyn, J. Legako, D. Woerner, Mark F. Miller
{"title":"Investigation of Smoked Beef Brisket Palatability from Three USDA Quality Grades","authors":"W. T. Fletcher, A. Garmyn, J. Legako, D. Woerner, Mark F. Miller","doi":"10.22175/mmb.10963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to investigate differences in smoked beef brisket palatability from 3 USDA quality grades (USDA Prime, average [middle 1/3] Choice, and Select). Briskets (n = 54; 18 per quality grade) were seasoned with a blend of 1:1 coarse salt/black pepper, and then cooked in a smoker to a final internal temperature of 93°C for approximately 6 to 7 h. For sensory analysis, briskets were separated into point (pectoralis superficialis) and flat (pectoralis profundus) portions and then sliced perpendicular to the muscle fibers. Consumer panelists (N = 360) evaluated palatability traits, acceptability of each trait, and willingness to pay (WTP). An interaction between quality grade and muscle was observed (P ≤ 0.03) for all palatability traits, proportion of acceptable samples, and WTP. Consumers could not distinguish among quality grades of the point portions for tenderness, juiciness, flavor liking, and overall liking (P > 0.05). Point samples, regardless of quality grade, were scored greater (P < 0.05) than Prime flat samples for all palatability traits. Choice and Select flat samples were scored lesser (P < 0.05) than all other treatment combinations for tenderness, flavor liking, and overall liking. In alignment with palatability traits, consumers’ WTP was greatest for point portions, regardless of quality grade (P < 0.05), followed by Prime flat portions. Choice and Select flat portions had the lowest WTP (P < 0.05). Consumer acceptability of cooked beef brisket generally followed similar trends as palatability scores. Quality grade had no effect on the eating quality of the point portions of smoked briskets, and point portions received superior palatability scores to flat portions. Prime flat portions had greater eating quality compared to that of Choice and Select flat portions, and consumers had greater WTP for what they perceived as superior eating quality.","PeriodicalId":18316,"journal":{"name":"Meat and Muscle Biology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat and Muscle Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.10963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate differences in smoked beef brisket palatability from 3 USDA quality grades (USDA Prime, average [middle 1/3] Choice, and Select). Briskets (n = 54; 18 per quality grade) were seasoned with a blend of 1:1 coarse salt/black pepper, and then cooked in a smoker to a final internal temperature of 93°C for approximately 6 to 7 h. For sensory analysis, briskets were separated into point (pectoralis superficialis) and flat (pectoralis profundus) portions and then sliced perpendicular to the muscle fibers. Consumer panelists (N = 360) evaluated palatability traits, acceptability of each trait, and willingness to pay (WTP). An interaction between quality grade and muscle was observed (P ≤ 0.03) for all palatability traits, proportion of acceptable samples, and WTP. Consumers could not distinguish among quality grades of the point portions for tenderness, juiciness, flavor liking, and overall liking (P > 0.05). Point samples, regardless of quality grade, were scored greater (P < 0.05) than Prime flat samples for all palatability traits. Choice and Select flat samples were scored lesser (P < 0.05) than all other treatment combinations for tenderness, flavor liking, and overall liking. In alignment with palatability traits, consumers’ WTP was greatest for point portions, regardless of quality grade (P < 0.05), followed by Prime flat portions. Choice and Select flat portions had the lowest WTP (P < 0.05). Consumer acceptability of cooked beef brisket generally followed similar trends as palatability scores. Quality grade had no effect on the eating quality of the point portions of smoked briskets, and point portions received superior palatability scores to flat portions. Prime flat portions had greater eating quality compared to that of Choice and Select flat portions, and consumers had greater WTP for what they perceived as superior eating quality.
美国农业部三个质量等级烟熏牛腩适口性的调查
本研究的目的是调查美国农业部三个质量等级(美国农业部优质,平均[中间1/3]选择和选择)熏牛腩适口性的差异。胸肉(n = 54;用1:1的粗盐/黑胡椒混合调味,然后在烤炉中煮至93°C的最终内部温度约6至7小时。为了进行感官分析,将胸肉分成点(胸浅肌)和平面(胸深肌)部分,然后垂直于肌肉纤维切片。消费者小组成员(N = 360)评估了适口性特征、每种特征的可接受性和支付意愿(WTP)。品质等级与肌肉在所有适口性状、可接受样品比例和WTP之间存在交互作用(P≤0.03)。消费者在嫩度、多汁性、风味喜好度和整体喜好度等方面无法区分不同的质量等级(P < 0.05)。无论质量等级如何,点样在所有适口性性状上的得分均高于平面样(P < 0.05)。选择和选择扁平样品在嫩度、风味喜好和总体喜好方面得分低于所有其他处理组合(P < 0.05)。与适口性状一致,无论质量等级如何,消费者对点状部分的WTP最高(P < 0.05),其次是优质扁平部分。选择部分和选择平坦部分的WTP最低(P < 0.05)。消费者对煮熟牛腩的接受程度与适口性评分大体相同。质量等级对烟熏牛腩点状部分的食用质量没有影响,点状部分的适口性得分高于扁平部分。与“精选”和“精选”相比,优质扁平食品的饮食质量更高,消费者对他们认为的优质饮食质量有更高的WTP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信