One Heresy and One Orthodoxy: On Dialetheism, Dimathematism, and the Non-normativity of Logic.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Investigation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-09 DOI:10.1007/s10670-022-00528-8
Heinrich Wansing
{"title":"One Heresy and One Orthodoxy: On Dialetheism, Dimathematism, and the Non-normativity of Logic.","authors":"Heinrich Wansing","doi":"10.1007/s10670-022-00528-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, Graham Priest's understanding of dialetheism, the view that there exist true contradictions, is discussed, and various kinds of metaphysical dialetheism are distinguished between. An alternative to dialetheism is presented, namely a thesis called 'dimathematism'. It is pointed out that dimathematism enables one to escape a slippery slope argument for dialetheism that has been put forward by Priest. Moreover, dimathematism is presented as a thesis that is helpful in rejecting the claim that logic is a normative discipline.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":"1 1","pages":"181-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10827935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00528-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, Graham Priest's understanding of dialetheism, the view that there exist true contradictions, is discussed, and various kinds of metaphysical dialetheism are distinguished between. An alternative to dialetheism is presented, namely a thesis called 'dimathematism'. It is pointed out that dimathematism enables one to escape a slippery slope argument for dialetheism that has been put forward by Priest. Moreover, dimathematism is presented as a thesis that is helpful in rejecting the claim that logic is a normative discipline.

一个异端和一个正统:论 Dialetheism、Dimathematism 和逻辑的非规范性。
本文讨论了格雷厄姆-普里斯特对 "二律背反"(即存在真正矛盾的观点)的理解,并区分了各种形而上学的 "二律背反"。他还提出了拨神论的替代方案,即 "二律背反论"。论文指出,二律背反论使人们摆脱了普利斯特为辩证神论提出的滑坡论证。此外,"二律背反论 "还有助于驳斥逻辑学是一门规范性学科的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Investigation
Cancer Investigation 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信