Feasibility assessment of global standard chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with esophageal cancer.

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Yao Liang, Osamu Maeda, Kazushi Miyata, Mitsuro Kanda, Dai Shimizu, Shizuki Sugita, Tohru Okada, Junji Ito, Mariko Kawamura, Shunichi Ishihara, Masahiro Nakatochi, Masahiko Ando, Yasuhiro Kodera, Yuichi Ando
{"title":"Feasibility assessment of global standard chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with esophageal cancer.","authors":"Yao Liang,&nbsp;Osamu Maeda,&nbsp;Kazushi Miyata,&nbsp;Mitsuro Kanda,&nbsp;Dai Shimizu,&nbsp;Shizuki Sugita,&nbsp;Tohru Okada,&nbsp;Junji Ito,&nbsp;Mariko Kawamura,&nbsp;Shunichi Ishihara,&nbsp;Masahiro Nakatochi,&nbsp;Masahiko Ando,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Kodera,&nbsp;Yuichi Ando","doi":"10.3892/mco.2023.2630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of global standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. A prospective study was conducted at Nagoya University Hospital (Nagoya, Japan) to evaluate global standard CRT followed by surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. The CRT regimen consisted of 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cisplatin on day 1 and 1,000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> fluorouracil daily on days 1-4 given twice 4 weeks apart together with concurrent esophageal irradiation starting on day 1 (group A). For comparison, 17 patients with esophageal cancer who had received the same chemotherapy regimen but with lower drug doses were retrospectively reviewed: 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cisplatin on day 1 and 700 mg/m<sup>2</sup> fluorouracil daily on days 1-4 given twice 4 weeks apart together with concurrent esophageal irradiation starting on day 1 (group B). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were observed in 9 of the 12 patients (75%) in group A and in 5 of the 17 patients (29%) in group B. The patients in group A were more likely to experience grade 3 or worse neutropenia (50%) than those in group B (6%). No febrile neutropenia or treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. A total of 11 patients (92%) in group A and 16 patients (94%) in group B subsequently underwent an esophagectomy, and 9 (82%) and 14 (88%) of these patients, respectively, achieved microscopically margin-negative resection (R0 resection). In conclusion, global standard CRT was more likely to cause severe but manageable adverse events. There was no apparent difference in the R0 resection rate or postoperative complications between the two treatments. This clinical trial was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (trial registration number: jRCT1041180004) on September 11, 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":18737,"journal":{"name":"Molecular and clinical oncology","volume":"18 4","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/ce/mco-18-04-02630.PMC10011946.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular and clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of global standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. A prospective study was conducted at Nagoya University Hospital (Nagoya, Japan) to evaluate global standard CRT followed by surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. The CRT regimen consisted of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1,000 mg/m2 fluorouracil daily on days 1-4 given twice 4 weeks apart together with concurrent esophageal irradiation starting on day 1 (group A). For comparison, 17 patients with esophageal cancer who had received the same chemotherapy regimen but with lower drug doses were retrospectively reviewed: 70 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 700 mg/m2 fluorouracil daily on days 1-4 given twice 4 weeks apart together with concurrent esophageal irradiation starting on day 1 (group B). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were observed in 9 of the 12 patients (75%) in group A and in 5 of the 17 patients (29%) in group B. The patients in group A were more likely to experience grade 3 or worse neutropenia (50%) than those in group B (6%). No febrile neutropenia or treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. A total of 11 patients (92%) in group A and 16 patients (94%) in group B subsequently underwent an esophagectomy, and 9 (82%) and 14 (88%) of these patients, respectively, achieved microscopically margin-negative resection (R0 resection). In conclusion, global standard CRT was more likely to cause severe but manageable adverse events. There was no apparent difference in the R0 resection rate or postoperative complications between the two treatments. This clinical trial was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (trial registration number: jRCT1041180004) on September 11, 2018.

食管癌患者全球标准放化疗后手术的可行性评估。
本研究旨在评估全球标准放化疗(CRT)后手术治疗食管癌患者的可行性。在名古屋大学医院(Nagoya, Japan)进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估食管癌患者的全球标准CRT术后治疗。CRT方案为:第1天给予75 mg/m2顺铂,第1-4天给予1000 mg/m2氟尿嘧啶,每日给予2次,间隔4周,同时从第1天开始进行食管照射(A组)。为了进行比较,回顾性分析17例接受相同化疗方案但药物剂量较低的食管癌患者:70 mg / m2顺铂在1天,每天700 mg / m2氟尿嘧啶在1 - 4天4周分开两次一起并发食管辐照开始第一天(B组)。3或更糟糕的不良事件观察到9年级的12名患者(75%)在A组和5的17个病人(29%)在B组患者更有可能体验组三年级或者更糟嗜中性白血球减少症(50%)比B组(6%)。两组均未发生发热性中性粒细胞减少或治疗相关死亡。A组11例(92%)患者和B组16例(94%)患者随后行食管切除术,其中9例(82%)和14例(88%)患者分别实现了镜下边缘阴性切除术(R0切除术)。总之,全球标准CRT更有可能引起严重但可控的不良事件。两种治疗方法的R0切除率及术后并发症无明显差异。该临床试验于2018年9月11日在日本临床试验注册中心注册(试验注册号:jRCT1041180004)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信