Brecht encounters “the system”

IF 0.2 0 THEATER
M. Silberman
{"title":"Brecht encounters “the system”","authors":"M. Silberman","doi":"10.1080/20567790.2020.1782560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Brecht’s “encounters” with Stanislavsky span the 1935 production of The Mother in New York and the 1953 Stanislavsky Conference in East Berlin, revealing the evolution in his thinking vis-à-vis his Russian counterpart. While the first encounter introduced him to American Method Acting as the epitome of dramatic theatre against which his epic theatre was aimed, it also convinced him that he needed a coherent “system” like Stanislavsky’s to reach a wider audience of theatre practitioners. As a result, Brecht authored during his last years of exile the Short Organon for the Theatre. If Stanislavsky’s name does not appear in it, concepts central to the epic theatre respond to Brecht’s understanding of what he referred to as Aristotelian, culinary, or Naturalist theatre identified with his rival. A similar project, Buying Brass (also known as The Messingkauf Dialogues), occupied Brecht in the years between 1939 and the early 1950’s. The fragmentary texts and conversations were the closest he came to presenting a “system,” here conceived as a theory to be performed on stage as dialogues and including references to techniques employed by Stanislavsky. This essay explores key theoretical issues in the evolution of Brecht’s understanding of Stanislavsky’s approach to the training of actors. The closest he came to experimenting with Stanislavskian “methods” was in his 1953 production of Erwin Strittmatter’s Katzgraben at the Berliner Ensemble. The documentation of rehearsals and discussions shows how Brecht used this as an opportunity to explore the affinities between the mature approaches of these two directors.","PeriodicalId":40821,"journal":{"name":"Stanislavski Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"41 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanislavski Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2020.1782560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Brecht’s “encounters” with Stanislavsky span the 1935 production of The Mother in New York and the 1953 Stanislavsky Conference in East Berlin, revealing the evolution in his thinking vis-à-vis his Russian counterpart. While the first encounter introduced him to American Method Acting as the epitome of dramatic theatre against which his epic theatre was aimed, it also convinced him that he needed a coherent “system” like Stanislavsky’s to reach a wider audience of theatre practitioners. As a result, Brecht authored during his last years of exile the Short Organon for the Theatre. If Stanislavsky’s name does not appear in it, concepts central to the epic theatre respond to Brecht’s understanding of what he referred to as Aristotelian, culinary, or Naturalist theatre identified with his rival. A similar project, Buying Brass (also known as The Messingkauf Dialogues), occupied Brecht in the years between 1939 and the early 1950’s. The fragmentary texts and conversations were the closest he came to presenting a “system,” here conceived as a theory to be performed on stage as dialogues and including references to techniques employed by Stanislavsky. This essay explores key theoretical issues in the evolution of Brecht’s understanding of Stanislavsky’s approach to the training of actors. The closest he came to experimenting with Stanislavskian “methods” was in his 1953 production of Erwin Strittmatter’s Katzgraben at the Berliner Ensemble. The documentation of rehearsals and discussions shows how Brecht used this as an opportunity to explore the affinities between the mature approaches of these two directors.
布莱希特遇到了“系统”
布莱希特与斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的“相遇”跨越了1935年在纽约演出的《母亲》和1953年在东柏林举行的斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基会议,揭示了他与-à-vis俄罗斯同行的思想演变。虽然第一次相遇使他认识到美国方法表演作为戏剧戏剧的缩影,他的史诗剧院的目标,这也使他确信,他需要一个连贯的“系统”像斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的戏剧从业者接触到更广泛的观众。因此,布莱希特在他流亡的最后几年为剧院创作了《短风琴》。如果斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的名字没有出现在其中,史诗戏剧的核心概念回应了布莱希特的理解,他将其称为亚里士多德式的,烹饪式的,或自然主义的戏剧,与他的对手认同。一个类似的项目,购买黄铜(也被称为Messingkauf对话),在1939年到50年代早期占据了布莱希特。支离破碎的文本和对话是他最接近于呈现一个“系统”的东西,在这里被设想为一个理论,作为对话在舞台上表演,并引用了斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基使用的技巧。本文探讨了布莱希特对斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基演员训练方法的理解演变过程中的关键理论问题。1953年,他在柏林合奏团(Berliner Ensemble)演出了欧文·斯特里马特(Erwin Strittmatter)的《卡兹格拉本》(Katzgraben),这是他与斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的“方法”最接近的一次尝试。排练和讨论的记录显示了布莱希特如何利用这个机会来探索这两位导演成熟的方法之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信