Re-authorization of gelatin and collagen of ruminant origin in non-ruminant feed: a new analytical challenge for the control of the feed ban

O. Fumière, J. Zagon, M. Lecrenier
{"title":"Re-authorization of gelatin and collagen of ruminant origin in non-ruminant feed: a new analytical challenge for the control of the feed ban","authors":"O. Fumière, J. Zagon, M. Lecrenier","doi":"10.25518/1780-4507.20059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Description of the subject. A recent revision of the feed ban provisions authorizes the use of ruminant collagen and gelatin in feed for non-ruminant farmed animals. This authorization will promote the use of former foodstuffs (FFS) in poultry and pig feed. Objectives. The study aimed to investigate how these ruminant materials could impact the capacity to detect processed animal proteins (PAP) of ruminant origin in feed using the official PCR method and to evaluate the added value of a mass spectrometry protocol in development. Method. Presence of ruminant DNA in samples of collagen hydrolysate, gelatin and FFS collected from the industry was assessed using the official DNA extraction and PCR method. This allowed to evaluate the PCR inhibition properties of gelatin and collagen. The same samples were also submitted to a mass spectrometry-based proteomics (UHPLC-MS/MS) protocol targeting ruminant proteins, including collagen, to distinguish between ruminant by-products (unauthorized or authorized). Results. The results show the complementarity of PCR and UHPLC-MS/MS approaches in the context of the use of former foodstuffs in animal feed. Their combination has allowed to evidence that the presence of ruminant DNA in samples containing FFS was more linked to the presence of milk than to the presence of gelatin. On contrary, some samples have shown an increase of the cycle threshold value (Ct) that could correspond to an inhibitory effect due to gelatin addition. Conclusions. In the context of the circular economy, FFS is an interesting source of nutriment for animal feed. However, due to the presence of dairy ingredients, interference with official methods giving false suspicion of prohibited materials is to be expected. Furthermore, a masking effect of the presence of PAP due to a PCR inhibitory effect by FFS is also possible.","PeriodicalId":87455,"journal":{"name":"Skull base surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skull base surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1780-4507.20059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Description of the subject. A recent revision of the feed ban provisions authorizes the use of ruminant collagen and gelatin in feed for non-ruminant farmed animals. This authorization will promote the use of former foodstuffs (FFS) in poultry and pig feed. Objectives. The study aimed to investigate how these ruminant materials could impact the capacity to detect processed animal proteins (PAP) of ruminant origin in feed using the official PCR method and to evaluate the added value of a mass spectrometry protocol in development. Method. Presence of ruminant DNA in samples of collagen hydrolysate, gelatin and FFS collected from the industry was assessed using the official DNA extraction and PCR method. This allowed to evaluate the PCR inhibition properties of gelatin and collagen. The same samples were also submitted to a mass spectrometry-based proteomics (UHPLC-MS/MS) protocol targeting ruminant proteins, including collagen, to distinguish between ruminant by-products (unauthorized or authorized). Results. The results show the complementarity of PCR and UHPLC-MS/MS approaches in the context of the use of former foodstuffs in animal feed. Their combination has allowed to evidence that the presence of ruminant DNA in samples containing FFS was more linked to the presence of milk than to the presence of gelatin. On contrary, some samples have shown an increase of the cycle threshold value (Ct) that could correspond to an inhibitory effect due to gelatin addition. Conclusions. In the context of the circular economy, FFS is an interesting source of nutriment for animal feed. However, due to the presence of dairy ingredients, interference with official methods giving false suspicion of prohibited materials is to be expected. Furthermore, a masking effect of the presence of PAP due to a PCR inhibitory effect by FFS is also possible.
非反刍动物饲料中反刍动物明胶和胶原蛋白的再授权:对饲料禁令控制的新的分析挑战
主题描述。最近修订的饲料禁令规定授权在非反刍养殖动物的饲料中使用反刍动物胶原蛋白和明胶。这项授权将促进在家禽和猪饲料中使用原食品(FFS)。目标。该研究旨在调查这些反刍动物材料如何影响使用官方PCR方法检测饲料中反刍动物来源的加工动物蛋白(PAP)的能力,并评估正在开发的质谱分析方案的附加价值。方法。采用官方的DNA提取和PCR方法对从业界收集的胶原水解物、明胶和FFS样品中反刍动物DNA的存在进行了评估。这可以用来评价明胶和胶原蛋白的PCR抑制特性。相同的样品也提交给基于质谱的蛋白质组学(UHPLC-MS/MS)方案,针对反刍动物蛋白质,包括胶原蛋白,以区分反刍动物副产品(未经授权或授权)。结果。结果表明,PCR和UHPLC-MS/MS方法在动物饲料中使用原食品的情况下具有互补性。它们的结合证明,在含有FFS的样品中,反刍动物DNA的存在与牛奶的存在联系更大,而不是与明胶的存在联系更大。相反,一些样品显示出循环阈值(Ct)的增加,这可能对应于明胶添加的抑制作用。结论。在循环经济的背景下,FFS是动物饲料的一种有趣的营养来源。然而,由于乳制品成分的存在,官方方法可能会受到干扰,从而产生对违禁物质的错误怀疑。此外,由于FFS的PCR抑制作用,PAP存在的掩蔽效应也是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信