Comparison of PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP bone scan in detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer.

IF 2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zenus J Wilson, Guofan Xu, Sanjit O Tewari, Yang Lu
{"title":"Comparison of PSMA-based <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL PET/CT and Tc-99m MDP bone scan in detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer.","authors":"Zenus J Wilson,&nbsp;Guofan Xu,&nbsp;Sanjit O Tewari,&nbsp;Yang Lu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While Tc-99m MDP bone scan (BS) remains the conventional standard for detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer, newly FDA-approved imaging with PSMA-based <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL PET/CT has shown promise for early detection of metastatic disease. However, a paucity of data remains in the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in detecting bone metastasis compared to BS. This retrospective study included 91 patients who received both BS and PSMA PET/CT within a 3-month interval from August 2021 to February 2022. Separate concurrent primary cancer, interval PSA levels greater than a 2-fold difference (or absolute difference >1 ng/ml) between the two studies were excluded. All abnormal bone lesions on either scan were compared. The findings were verified by pathological findings and/or 6-month clinical follow-up. High concordance (78%) was found between modalities with discordant findings (20/91, 22%) demonstrating more false positives (4/20, 20%) and false negatives (3/20, 15%) on BS compared to PET/CT. Additionally, more bone metastases were detected on PSMA PET/CT (13/20, 65%) with all true positive BS lesions also detected PET/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for BS were 89%, 91%, 80%, and 95% respectively; and 100%, 97%, 93%, and 100% for <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL PET/CT respectively. Our results demonstrate that <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL PET/CT identified more bone metastases while also identifying all bone metastases identified on BS. With the added diagnostic value of detecting primary tumor and soft tissue metastasis, <sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL PET/CT may render BS unnecessary to investigate bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7572,"journal":{"name":"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009469/pdf/ajnmmi0013-0001.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While Tc-99m MDP bone scan (BS) remains the conventional standard for detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer, newly FDA-approved imaging with PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT has shown promise for early detection of metastatic disease. However, a paucity of data remains in the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in detecting bone metastasis compared to BS. This retrospective study included 91 patients who received both BS and PSMA PET/CT within a 3-month interval from August 2021 to February 2022. Separate concurrent primary cancer, interval PSA levels greater than a 2-fold difference (or absolute difference >1 ng/ml) between the two studies were excluded. All abnormal bone lesions on either scan were compared. The findings were verified by pathological findings and/or 6-month clinical follow-up. High concordance (78%) was found between modalities with discordant findings (20/91, 22%) demonstrating more false positives (4/20, 20%) and false negatives (3/20, 15%) on BS compared to PET/CT. Additionally, more bone metastases were detected on PSMA PET/CT (13/20, 65%) with all true positive BS lesions also detected PET/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for BS were 89%, 91%, 80%, and 95% respectively; and 100%, 97%, 93%, and 100% for 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT respectively. Our results demonstrate that 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT identified more bone metastases while also identifying all bone metastases identified on BS. With the added diagnostic value of detecting primary tumor and soft tissue metastasis, 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT may render BS unnecessary to investigate bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.

基于psma的18F-DCFPyL PET/CT与Tc-99m MDP骨扫描检测前列腺癌骨转移的比较
虽然Tc-99m MDP骨扫描(BS)仍然是检测前列腺癌骨转移的常规标准,但最新fda批准的基于psma的18F-DCFPyL PET/CT成像显示出早期检测转移性疾病的希望。然而,与BS相比,PSMA PET/CT在检测骨转移方面的诊断准确性仍然缺乏数据。这项回顾性研究包括91名患者,他们在2021年8月至2022年2月的3个月内接受了BS和PSMA PET/CT。排除单独并发原发性癌症,两项研究间期PSA水平大于2倍差异(或绝对差异>1 ng/ml)。对两次扫描的所有异常骨病变进行比较。病理结果和/或6个月的临床随访证实了这些发现。与PET/CT相比,在不一致结果(20/ 91,22%)的模式之间发现了高一致性(78%),显示BS上更多的假阳性(4/ 20,20%)和假阴性(3/ 20,15%)。此外,在PSMA PET/CT上检测到更多的骨转移(13/20,65%),所有真阳性BS病变也在PET/CT上检测到。BS的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为89%、91%、80%和95%;18F-DCFPyL PET/CT分别为100%、97%、93%、100%。我们的研究结果表明,18F-DCFPyL PET/CT发现了更多的骨转移,同时也识别了所有在BS上发现的骨转移。18F-DCFPyL PET/CT增加了发现原发肿瘤和软组织转移的诊断价值,可能使BS不再需要检查前列腺癌患者的骨转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
4.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The scope of AJNMMI encompasses all areas of molecular imaging, including but not limited to: positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), molecular magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, optical bioluminescence, optical fluorescence, targeted ultrasound, photoacoustic imaging, etc. AJNMMI welcomes original and review articles on both clinical investigation and preclinical research. Occasionally, special topic issues, short communications, editorials, and invited perspectives will also be published. Manuscripts, including figures and tables, must be original and not under consideration by another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信