Care Perceptions in two ICU Nursing Care Delivery Models: A qualitative-comparative approach.

IF 1.3 Q3 NURSING
William Iván López Cárdenas, Esteban Gil Vidal, Rosa Milena Altamirano Ceron, Natalia Andrea Henao Murillo, Yuly Andrea Santa Mejía, Adriana Cristina Jurado Jiménez
{"title":"Care Perceptions in two ICU Nursing Care Delivery Models: A qualitative-comparative approach.","authors":"William Iván López Cárdenas,&nbsp;Esteban Gil Vidal,&nbsp;Rosa Milena Altamirano Ceron,&nbsp;Natalia Andrea Henao Murillo,&nbsp;Yuly Andrea Santa Mejía,&nbsp;Adriana Cristina Jurado Jiménez","doi":"10.17533/udea.iee.v40n3e15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Analyzed in compared perspective perceptions about nursing care, nurse-patient interaction, and nursing care outcomes in two ICU nursing staff in a high-complexity hospital institution, whose Nursing are Delivery Models (NCDM) are differentiated by the proportion of nurses and nurse assistants (NA) per team and by the assigned tasks and responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Particularist ethnography with adaptation to virtual methodologies. It included the sociodemographic characteristics of 19 nurses and 23 NA, 14 semi-structured interviews, review of patients' clinical records, and a focus group. Coding, categorization, inductive analysis, validation of results with participants were conducted and thematic saturation was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: i) Professionalized care: a nursing of superior value; ii) senses and feelings of care; iii) nursing workload, generating factors and impacts; and iv) nursing missed care as concrete expression of the nursing workload.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared nursing teams perceived nursing care in different ways, since it was experienced based on the assigned responsibilities and the possibilities of interaction with patients. Nursing care in the NCDM of the ICU with prevalence of direct bedside care by nurses with support from NA, it was perceived as holistic, comprehensive, and empathetic; whereas in the ICU with prevalence of delegated care to NA, it was related with administrative leadership and management of the ICU. Regarding the results, the NCDM of the ICU of direct bedside care by nurses showed better performance in patient safety and was closer to the skill level and legal responsibility of the nursing staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":53477,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017135/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n3e15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Analyzed in compared perspective perceptions about nursing care, nurse-patient interaction, and nursing care outcomes in two ICU nursing staff in a high-complexity hospital institution, whose Nursing are Delivery Models (NCDM) are differentiated by the proportion of nurses and nurse assistants (NA) per team and by the assigned tasks and responsibilities.

Methods: Particularist ethnography with adaptation to virtual methodologies. It included the sociodemographic characteristics of 19 nurses and 23 NA, 14 semi-structured interviews, review of patients' clinical records, and a focus group. Coding, categorization, inductive analysis, validation of results with participants were conducted and thematic saturation was achieved.

Results: Four themes were identified: i) Professionalized care: a nursing of superior value; ii) senses and feelings of care; iii) nursing workload, generating factors and impacts; and iv) nursing missed care as concrete expression of the nursing workload.

Conclusions: Compared nursing teams perceived nursing care in different ways, since it was experienced based on the assigned responsibilities and the possibilities of interaction with patients. Nursing care in the NCDM of the ICU with prevalence of direct bedside care by nurses with support from NA, it was perceived as holistic, comprehensive, and empathetic; whereas in the ICU with prevalence of delegated care to NA, it was related with administrative leadership and management of the ICU. Regarding the results, the NCDM of the ICU of direct bedside care by nurses showed better performance in patient safety and was closer to the skill level and legal responsibility of the nursing staff.

Abstract Image

两种ICU护理服务模式的护理感知:一种定性比较方法。
目的:比较分析某高复杂性医院机构两名ICU护理人员对护理、护患互动和护理结果的看法,该机构的护理交付模式(NCDM)以每个团队的护士和护士助理(NA)的比例以及分配的任务和责任来区分。方法:适应虚拟方法论的特殊民族志。它包括19名护士和23名护士的社会人口学特征,14次半结构化访谈,对患者临床记录的回顾,以及一个焦点小组。进行编码、分类、归纳分析、结果与参与者验证,达到主题饱和。结果:确定了四个主题:1)专业化护理:护理的优越价值;Ii)关心的感觉和感受;Iii)护理工作量、产生因素及影响;护理缺失是护理工作量的具体表现。结论:比较护理团队对护理的不同感知方式,因为它是基于分配的责任和与患者互动的可能性来体验的。ICU的NCDM护理中,护士在NA的支持下直接床边护理的流行,被认为是整体的,全面的和共情的;而在ICU中,将护理委托给NA的患病率与ICU的行政领导和管理有关。结果显示,ICU护士直接床边护理的NCDM在患者安全方面表现更好,更接近护理人员的技能水平和法律责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the journal of Nursing and Education is to present scientific and technical information about health, illnesses and related topics. The journal serves as the conduit [medium] through which the experiences of our own nursing and social science departments can be shared within Columbia and internationally. It is written primarily for nurses, general health practitioners and other related disciplines but can also be used by students and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信