Robotic-arm assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 5-Year outcomes & survivorship.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Michael A Gaudiani, Linsen T Samuel, John N Diana, Jennifer L DeBattista, Thomas M Coon, Ryan E Moore, Atul F Kamath
{"title":"Robotic-arm assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 5-Year outcomes & survivorship.","authors":"Michael A Gaudiani,&nbsp;Linsen T Samuel,&nbsp;John N Diana,&nbsp;Jennifer L DeBattista,&nbsp;Thomas M Coon,&nbsp;Ryan E Moore,&nbsp;Atul F Kamath","doi":"10.1177/10225536221138986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) has demonstrated accurate component positioning and excellent outcomes for medial components. However, there is a paucity of literature on lateral compartment RA-UKA. The purpose of our study was to assess the midterm clinical outcomes and survivorship of lateral RA-UKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective review of a single-center prospectively maintained cohort of 33 patients (36 knees) indicated for lateral UKA. Perioperative, and postoperative two- and five-year Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) patient reported outcome measures were collected. Five-year follow-up was recorded in 29 patients (32 knees).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean follow up was 5.1 ± 0.1 years. Mean age and BMI was 70.9 ± 7.2 years and 29.0 ± 4.2 kg/m2, respectively. At discharge, mean distance walked was 273.4 ± 70.4 feet, and mean pain score was 2.0 ± 2.5. At 2-year follow up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 75.1 ± 13.5, 15.0 ± 7.2, and 81.0 ± 23.3, respectively. At 5-year follow up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 75.3 ± 14.6, 14.9 ± 5.0, and 75.8 ± 27.4, respectively. Mean change in KOOS and WOMAC were 35.6 ± 27.1 and 11.7 ± 13.4 (<i>p</i>< .001 and <i>p</i>< .001). 94% of patients were very satisfied/satisfied, 3% neutral, and 3% dissatisfied. 91% met activity expectations, and 59% were more active than before. Survivorship was 100% at 5 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study, lateral RA-UKA demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, met expectations, and excellent functional recovery at midterm follow up. Comparative studies are needed to determine differences between robotic-assisted and conventional lateral UKA, as well as TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":"10225536221138986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221138986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) has demonstrated accurate component positioning and excellent outcomes for medial components. However, there is a paucity of literature on lateral compartment RA-UKA. The purpose of our study was to assess the midterm clinical outcomes and survivorship of lateral RA-UKA.

Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a single-center prospectively maintained cohort of 33 patients (36 knees) indicated for lateral UKA. Perioperative, and postoperative two- and five-year Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) patient reported outcome measures were collected. Five-year follow-up was recorded in 29 patients (32 knees).

Results: Mean follow up was 5.1 ± 0.1 years. Mean age and BMI was 70.9 ± 7.2 years and 29.0 ± 4.2 kg/m2, respectively. At discharge, mean distance walked was 273.4 ± 70.4 feet, and mean pain score was 2.0 ± 2.5. At 2-year follow up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 75.1 ± 13.5, 15.0 ± 7.2, and 81.0 ± 23.3, respectively. At 5-year follow up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 75.3 ± 14.6, 14.9 ± 5.0, and 75.8 ± 27.4, respectively. Mean change in KOOS and WOMAC were 35.6 ± 27.1 and 11.7 ± 13.4 (p< .001 and p< .001). 94% of patients were very satisfied/satisfied, 3% neutral, and 3% dissatisfied. 91% met activity expectations, and 59% were more active than before. Survivorship was 100% at 5 years.

Discussion: In this study, lateral RA-UKA demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, met expectations, and excellent functional recovery at midterm follow up. Comparative studies are needed to determine differences between robotic-assisted and conventional lateral UKA, as well as TKA.

机械臂辅助的外侧单室膝关节置换术:5年预后和生存率。
机器人手臂辅助的单室膝关节置换术(RA-UKA)已经证明了准确的部件定位和良好的内侧部件效果。然而,关于侧室RA-UKA的文献很少。本研究的目的是评估外侧RA-UKA的中期临床结果和生存期。方法:本研究是对33例(36个膝关节)侧位UKA患者的单中心前瞻性队列进行回顾性分析。收集围手术期和术后2年和5年膝关节损伤性骨关节炎结局评分(oos)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎评分(WOMAC)和遗忘关节评分(FJS)患者报告的结局指标。随访29例(32膝),随访5年。结果:平均随访5.1±0.1年。平均年龄为70.9±7.2岁,BMI为29.0±4.2 kg/m2。出院时,平均步行距离为273.4±70.4英尺,平均疼痛评分为2.0±2.5分。随访2年,平均kos、WOMAC和FJS分别为75.1±13.5、15.0±7.2和81.0±23.3。5年随访时,平均kos、WOMAC和FJS分别为75.3±14.6、14.9±5.0和75.8±27.4。kos和WOMAC的平均变化分别为35.6±27.1和11.7±13.4 (p< 0.001和p< 0.001)。94%的患者非常满意/满意,3%一般,3%不满意。91%的人达到了预期运动量,59%的人比以前更活跃。5年生存率为100%。讨论:在本研究中,横向RA-UKA在中期随访中表现出显著改善的临床结果,患者满意度高,达到预期,功能恢复良好。需要进行比较研究,以确定机器人辅助和传统的横向UKA以及TKA之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信