Evaluating Lexical Ambiguities About Brazilian Students in The Fifth Year of Elementary School Towards Statistical Graphs and Tables

Ailton Paulo de Oliveira Júnior, Luzia Roseli da Silva Santos, Fátima Aparecida Kian
{"title":"Evaluating Lexical Ambiguities About Brazilian Students in The Fifth Year of Elementary School Towards Statistical Graphs and Tables","authors":"Ailton Paulo de Oliveira Júnior, Luzia Roseli da Silva Santos, Fátima Aparecida Kian","doi":"10.37618/paradigma.1011-2251.2023.p151-174.id1314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When words that are part of everyday language are used differently from the way they are used in formal classroom language, it is said to present lexical ambiguity. Thus, this study aims to understand possible lexical ambiguities regarding knowledge about representations of statistical graphs and tables of 74 students in the fifth year of elementary school (approximately 10 years) of a municipal school in Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil. This research was exploratory, with a qualitative and quantitative approach, in which data were collected through a questionnaire available on Google Forms. An Automated Content Analysis was carried out using the IraMuTeQ software (R Interface for Multidimensional Text and Questionnaire Analysis) performing multivariate statistical analyzes (Descending Hierarchical Classification - DHC and Factorial Analysis by Correspondence – CFA). The results show the predominance of words and verbal expressions of the common language related mainly to the intuitive meaning and its use in everyday life. It was also noticed indications of the formal construction of tables and graphs associated with guidelines carried out in the classroom.","PeriodicalId":52797,"journal":{"name":"Paradigma Jurnal Kajian Budaya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paradigma Jurnal Kajian Budaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37618/paradigma.1011-2251.2023.p151-174.id1314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When words that are part of everyday language are used differently from the way they are used in formal classroom language, it is said to present lexical ambiguity. Thus, this study aims to understand possible lexical ambiguities regarding knowledge about representations of statistical graphs and tables of 74 students in the fifth year of elementary school (approximately 10 years) of a municipal school in Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil. This research was exploratory, with a qualitative and quantitative approach, in which data were collected through a questionnaire available on Google Forms. An Automated Content Analysis was carried out using the IraMuTeQ software (R Interface for Multidimensional Text and Questionnaire Analysis) performing multivariate statistical analyzes (Descending Hierarchical Classification - DHC and Factorial Analysis by Correspondence – CFA). The results show the predominance of words and verbal expressions of the common language related mainly to the intuitive meaning and its use in everyday life. It was also noticed indications of the formal construction of tables and graphs associated with guidelines carried out in the classroom.
用统计图表评价巴西小学五年级学生词汇歧义
当日常语言中的词汇与正式课堂语言中的词汇使用方式不同时,就会出现词汇歧义。因此,本研究旨在了解巴西圣保罗巴鲁里市一所市立学校小学五年级(约10年)74名学生在统计图表表示知识方面可能存在的词汇歧义。本研究是探索性的,采用定性和定量方法,通过谷歌表格上的问卷调查收集数据。使用IraMuTeQ软件(用于多维文本和问卷分析的R界面)执行多变量统计分析(下降层次分类- DHC和对应析因分析- CFA)进行自动内容分析。结果表明,普通语言的词汇和口头表达的优势主要与直观意义及其在日常生活中的使用有关。还注意到在课堂上进行的与指导方针相关的表格和图表的正式构造的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信