Interrelationship Between Fiscal Deficit, Aggregate Savings and Investment: A Test of Ricardian Equivalence Hypothesis in Nigeria

Ogbuagu Matthew Ikechukwu, Joseph A. Omojolaibi
{"title":"Interrelationship Between Fiscal Deficit, Aggregate Savings and Investment: A Test of Ricardian Equivalence Hypothesis in Nigeria","authors":"Ogbuagu Matthew Ikechukwu, Joseph A. Omojolaibi","doi":"10.56279/ter.v10i1.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conflicting results on the relationship between government fiscal deficit, savings and investment behaviour of households remains unresolved. Some authors have argued that households might unconsciously play out adherence to the dictates of the Ricardian equivalence hypothesis (REH) because they practice an infinite consumption horizon. Relying on the vector autoregression (VAR) technique and the impulse response function (IRF), this study examines the validity of the REH and the interactions between fiscal deficit, aggregate savings, and private investment in Nigeria within a 48-year period. The results reveal that government fiscal deficit exerts negative effects on gross domestic savings and investment, which is further affirmed by the impulse response function (IRF). These findings rather uphold the neoclassical literary arguments that economic growth is retarded due to crowding out effects resulting from fiscal deficits; hence opposing the REH. Thus, policy-makers should adhere to the fiscal deficits benchmark of less than 40 percent of GDP as proposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to maintain stable macroeconomic conditions. \nJEL Classification: E62, E21-E22, E23","PeriodicalId":91807,"journal":{"name":"Tanzanian economic review","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzanian economic review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ter.v10i1.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Conflicting results on the relationship between government fiscal deficit, savings and investment behaviour of households remains unresolved. Some authors have argued that households might unconsciously play out adherence to the dictates of the Ricardian equivalence hypothesis (REH) because they practice an infinite consumption horizon. Relying on the vector autoregression (VAR) technique and the impulse response function (IRF), this study examines the validity of the REH and the interactions between fiscal deficit, aggregate savings, and private investment in Nigeria within a 48-year period. The results reveal that government fiscal deficit exerts negative effects on gross domestic savings and investment, which is further affirmed by the impulse response function (IRF). These findings rather uphold the neoclassical literary arguments that economic growth is retarded due to crowding out effects resulting from fiscal deficits; hence opposing the REH. Thus, policy-makers should adhere to the fiscal deficits benchmark of less than 40 percent of GDP as proposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to maintain stable macroeconomic conditions. JEL Classification: E62, E21-E22, E23
财政赤字、总储蓄和投资的相互关系:对尼日利亚李嘉图等价假设的检验
关于政府财政赤字、家庭储蓄和投资行为之间关系的矛盾结果仍未得到解决。一些作者认为,家庭可能会无意识地遵守李嘉图等价假设(REH)的规定,因为他们实践了无限的消费范围。依靠向量自回归(VAR)技术和脉冲响应函数(IRF),本研究检验了尼日利亚48年内REH的有效性以及财政赤字、总储蓄和私人投资之间的相互作用。结果表明,政府财政赤字对国内储蓄总额和投资产生负向影响,脉冲响应函数(IRF)进一步证实了这一点。这些发现支持了新古典主义文学的观点,即财政赤字造成的挤出效应阻碍了经济增长;因此反对REH。因此,政策制定者应坚持国际货币基金组织(IMF)提出的财政赤字低于GDP 40%的基准,以保持稳定的宏观经济条件。JEL分类:E62, E21-E22, E23
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信