Jeffrey Huang, Lauren K. Licatino, T. Long
{"title":"Methods of Orienting New Anesthesiology Residents to the Operating Room Environment: A National Survey of Residency Program Directors.","authors":"Jeffrey Huang, Lauren K. Licatino, T. Long","doi":"10.46374/volxxii_issue3_licatino","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe initial weeks of clinical anesthesiology are a formative period for new residents. Trainees may be clinically educated by a variety of individuals, and introductory didactic structure likely differs between institutions. This study was undertaken to define current orientation practices in US anesthesiology residency programs.\n\n\nMethods\nA survey was created using Qualtrics© software and distributed to all US anesthesiology residency program directors through the Society of Academic Associations of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine email newsletter and through direct email to program directors.\n\n\nResults\nFifty-six unique survey responses were received of 156 total programs. Eighty-nine percent of programs with an integrated intern year begin anesthesia-related orientation before the first year of clinical anesthesiology. Sixty-three percent of programs pair trainees with more than one specific individual during orientation. Programs most frequently pair trainees with anesthesiologists (75%) and/or senior residents (70%). Forty-six percent maintain this pairing for 4 weeks and 30% for 6 weeks or longer. Forty-three percent provide education on teaching practices to trainers. Introductory didactics last a median of 30 hours. Programs may blend lectures, simulations/workshops, digital content, problem-based learning, pocket references, and/or checklists into a cohesive introductory curriculum. Fifty-six percent begin call responsibilities in the sixth week of orientation or later.\n\n\nConclusions\nOrientation practices for clinical anesthesia training vary across residency programs in the United States. We hope this information will help program directors compare their orientation practices to other programs and identify best practices and potentially useful variations.","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"38 1","pages":"E645"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii_issue3_licatino","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
引导麻醉科新住院医师进入手术室环境的方法:一项全国住院医师项目主任调查。
临床麻醉学的最初几周是新住院医生的形成期。受训者可能由不同的个体进行临床教育,不同机构的介绍性教学结构可能不同。本研究旨在定义当前美国麻醉学住院医师项目的入职实践。方法采用Qualtrics©软件进行调查,并通过美国麻醉学与围手术期医学学术协会的电子邮件通讯和直接电子邮件发送给所有美国麻醉学住院医师项目主任。结果156个项目共收到56份独特的调查反馈。89%的综合实习项目在临床麻醉学的第一年之前就开始了与麻醉相关的培训。63%的培训项目会在培训期间将受训人员与不止一个特定的人配对。项目通常将实习生与麻醉师(75%)和/或老年住院医师(70%)配对。46%的人维持这种配对4周,30%的人维持6周或更长时间。43%的公司为培训师提供教学实践方面的教育。入门教学平均持续30个小时。课程可以将讲座、模拟/研讨会、数字内容、基于问题的学习、口袋参考和/或检查表融合到一个有凝聚力的入门课程中。56%的人在入职培训的第六周或更晚的时候开始打电话。结论:在美国不同的住院医师项目中,临床麻醉培训的入职实践各不相同。我们希望这些信息能够帮助项目主管将他们的培训实践与其他项目进行比较,并确定最佳实践和潜在的有用变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。