Endoscopic trans-anal tube placement is a safe and helpful tool for colonic decompression: final results of a standardized single-centre retrospective assessment of 125 patients.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-20 DOI:10.1055/a-1989-2062
Andreas Horn, Manij Sabet, Florian Roghmann, Volker Meves, Martin Loss, Juergen Hochberger, Christoph Benckert, Andreas Wolfgang Berger
{"title":"Endoscopic trans-anal tube placement is a safe and helpful tool for colonic decompression: final results of a standardized single-centre retrospective assessment of 125 patients.","authors":"Andreas Horn, Manij Sabet, Florian Roghmann, Volker Meves, Martin Loss, Juergen Hochberger, Christoph Benckert, Andreas Wolfgang Berger","doi":"10.1055/a-1989-2062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Endoscopic trans-anal colonic decompression (ECD) may be requested in the case of massive colon distension, but evidence regarding success and safety issues remains scarce. The aim of this analysis is to examine the technical success, complications and clinical outcome in a large series of patients undergoing an ECD in various clinical scenarios. A standardized evaluation system was used to identify the pre-interventional risk parameters that might be helpful to guide clinical decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre retrospective study, the modified Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) was applied to assess technical success, complications and clinical outcome of 125 consecutive patients who underwent ECD between 2007 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>post interventional 90-day mortality. Secondary endpoints: periprocedural complications (CDC event IV-V) and technical success rate. All Martin criteria for standardized reporting of complications were met. Uni- and multivariable analyses for prediction of complications were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall technical success rate was 90%. The periprocedural complication rate was low with 3%. Overall 90-day mortality was 31%. Univariable analyses showed a significant correlation between 90-day mortality and ASA≥4 (p<0.001, odds ratio [OR] 15.33), general anaesthesia (p=0.05, OR 21.42) and elevated serological infection parameters (p 0.028, OR 1.004). The pre-interventional multivariable model identified ASA ≥4 (p <0.001; OR 10.94) as the only independent risk factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECD is a safe, easily available, technical feasible, inexpensive and successful tool for colonic decompression in various colonic obstruction scenarios, even in critically ill patients. ASA Score ≥IV can be helpful to identify patients at risk for complications/mortality after ECD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23853,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1989-2062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Endoscopic trans-anal colonic decompression (ECD) may be requested in the case of massive colon distension, but evidence regarding success and safety issues remains scarce. The aim of this analysis is to examine the technical success, complications and clinical outcome in a large series of patients undergoing an ECD in various clinical scenarios. A standardized evaluation system was used to identify the pre-interventional risk parameters that might be helpful to guide clinical decision making.

Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, the modified Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) was applied to assess technical success, complications and clinical outcome of 125 consecutive patients who underwent ECD between 2007 and 2020.

Primary endpoint: post interventional 90-day mortality. Secondary endpoints: periprocedural complications (CDC event IV-V) and technical success rate. All Martin criteria for standardized reporting of complications were met. Uni- and multivariable analyses for prediction of complications were carried out.

Results: The overall technical success rate was 90%. The periprocedural complication rate was low with 3%. Overall 90-day mortality was 31%. Univariable analyses showed a significant correlation between 90-day mortality and ASA≥4 (p<0.001, odds ratio [OR] 15.33), general anaesthesia (p=0.05, OR 21.42) and elevated serological infection parameters (p 0.028, OR 1.004). The pre-interventional multivariable model identified ASA ≥4 (p <0.001; OR 10.94) as the only independent risk factor.

Conclusions: ECD is a safe, easily available, technical feasible, inexpensive and successful tool for colonic decompression in various colonic obstruction scenarios, even in critically ill patients. ASA Score ≥IV can be helpful to identify patients at risk for complications/mortality after ECD.

内窥镜经肛门置管是结肠减压的安全和有用工具:对 125 名患者进行的标准化单中心回顾性评估的最终结果。
目的:大量结肠胀气时可能需要进行内窥镜经肛门结肠减压术(ECD),但有关成功率和安全性问题的证据仍然很少。本分析旨在研究在各种临床情况下接受 ECD 的大量患者的技术成功率、并发症和临床结果。采用标准化的评估系统来确定介入前的风险参数,这些参数可能有助于指导临床决策:在这项单中心回顾性研究中,采用改良的克拉维恩-丁多分类法(CDC)评估了2007年至2020年间接受电切镜手术的125名连续患者的技术成功率、并发症和临床结局。次要终点:围术期并发症(CDC事件IV-V)和技术成功率。符合并发症标准化报告的所有马丁标准。对并发症的预测进行了单变量和多变量分析:结果:总体技术成功率为 90%。围手术期并发症发生率较低,仅为 3%。90天总死亡率为31%。单变量分析显示,90天死亡率与ASA≥4之间存在显著相关性(p结论:ECD 是一种安全、易于获得、技术可行、成本低廉且成功的结肠减压工具,适用于各种结肠阻塞情况,即使是重症患者也不例外。ASA 评分≥IV 可以帮助识别 ECD 后有并发症/死亡风险的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie
Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
562
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie ist seit über 50 Jahren die führende deutsche Fachzeitschrift auf dem Gebiet der Gastroenterologie. Sie richtet sich an Gastroenterologen und alle anderen gastroenterologisch interessierten Ärzte. Als offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten sowie der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie informiert sie zuverlässig und aktuell über die wichtigen Neuerungen und Entwicklungen in der Gastroenterologie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信