Associations between the misinformation effect, trauma exposure and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Laura Jobson, Kimberley A Wade, Samantha Rasor, Emily Spearing, Cassandra McEwen, Danielle Fahmi
{"title":"Associations between the misinformation effect, trauma exposure and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression.","authors":"Laura Jobson,&nbsp;Kimberley A Wade,&nbsp;Samantha Rasor,&nbsp;Emily Spearing,&nbsp;Cassandra McEwen,&nbsp;Danielle Fahmi","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2022.2134422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research aimed to conduct an initial investigation into the relationships between the \"misinformation effect\" and trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Study 1 was a pilot study developing an online misinformation paradigm that could assess the influence of emotion and arousal on memory distortions. Participants (<i>n</i> = 162, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 39.90; <i>SD </i>= 10.90) were recruited through TurkPrime. In Study 2 community members (<i>n </i>= 116, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 28.96; <i>SD</i> = 10.33) completed this misinformation paradigm and measures of trauma exposure, PTSD, and depression. Study 1 found memory for central details was better for high-arousal than low-arousal and neutral-arousal images. Peripheral memory appeared worse for negative and neutral images than positive images. Study 2 found that, when controlling for age and gender, PTSD symptoms significantly predicted proportion of correct responses on control items. However, there was no evidence to indicate that trauma exposure, PTSD symptoms nor depression symptoms, were associated with proportion of correct responses on misled items. Valence and arousal did not influence these associations. These findings have important implications in clinical and legal contexts where individuals with a history of trauma, or who are experiencing symptoms of PTSD or depression, are often required to recall emotionally-laden events. There is a surprising dearth of research into the misinformation effect in clinical populations and further research is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":"31 2","pages":"179-191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2022.2134422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research aimed to conduct an initial investigation into the relationships between the "misinformation effect" and trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Study 1 was a pilot study developing an online misinformation paradigm that could assess the influence of emotion and arousal on memory distortions. Participants (n = 162, Mage = 39.90; SD = 10.90) were recruited through TurkPrime. In Study 2 community members (n = 116, Mage = 28.96; SD = 10.33) completed this misinformation paradigm and measures of trauma exposure, PTSD, and depression. Study 1 found memory for central details was better for high-arousal than low-arousal and neutral-arousal images. Peripheral memory appeared worse for negative and neutral images than positive images. Study 2 found that, when controlling for age and gender, PTSD symptoms significantly predicted proportion of correct responses on control items. However, there was no evidence to indicate that trauma exposure, PTSD symptoms nor depression symptoms, were associated with proportion of correct responses on misled items. Valence and arousal did not influence these associations. These findings have important implications in clinical and legal contexts where individuals with a history of trauma, or who are experiencing symptoms of PTSD or depression, are often required to recall emotionally-laden events. There is a surprising dearth of research into the misinformation effect in clinical populations and further research is required.

错误信息效应、创伤暴露与创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症症状之间的关系。
本研究旨在初步探讨“错误信息效应”与创伤暴露、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症之间的关系。研究1是一项初步研究,开发了一个在线错误信息范式,可以评估情绪和唤醒对记忆扭曲的影响。参与者(n = 162, Mage = 39.90;SD = 10.90)通过TurkPrime招募。在研究2中,社区成员(n = 116, Mage = 28.96;SD = 10.33)完成了这个错误信息范例,并测量了创伤暴露、创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症。研究1发现,与低唤醒和中性唤醒图像相比,高唤醒图像对中心细节的记忆更好。消极和中性图像的周边记忆比积极图像差。研究2发现,当控制年龄和性别时,PTSD症状显著预测控制项目的正确反应比例。然而,没有证据表明创伤暴露、创伤后应激障碍症状或抑郁症状与对误导项目的正确反应比例有关。效价和觉醒对这些关联没有影响。这些发现在临床和法律环境中具有重要意义,因为有创伤史的人,或者正在经历创伤后应激障碍或抑郁症症状的人,经常需要回忆充满情感的事件。令人惊讶的是,对临床人群中错误信息效应的研究缺乏,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信