Knowledge and confidence in the diagnosis and management of leprosy among Family Medicine Specialists in Malaysia

IF 0.2 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Felix Boon-Bin Yap , Sze Ting Kiung
{"title":"Knowledge and confidence in the diagnosis and management of leprosy among Family Medicine Specialists in Malaysia","authors":"Felix Boon-Bin Yap ,&nbsp;Sze Ting Kiung","doi":"10.1016/j.jdds.2015.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background:</em> Family Medicine Specialists (FMS) play a pivotal role in the detection of leprosy in primary care. This study determines the knowledge and confidence among FMS in Malaysia. <em>Method:</em> Pre-intervention questionnaire was conducted followed by a 3<!--> <!-->day educational intervention. Post-intervention questionnaire was conducted again 2<!--> <!-->months thereafter. The questionnaire assessed knowledge and confidence in the diagnosis and management of leprosy. <em>Results:</em> The mean total mark for the pre-intervention knowledge questionnaires was 35.4 out of 50 and the mean confidence was 4.0 out of 10 for diagnosis and 3.3 out of 10 for management. Knowledge improved 24.0% post-intervention (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). Knowledge on pathogenesis and clinical features improved the most with 38.5% and 32.4% respectively whereas knowledge on leprosy reactions improved the least with only 15.1%. The confidence level improved 85% to 7.4 for diagnosis and 118.2% to 7.2 for management post-intervention (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). FMS with more experience, seeing more than 5 patients in their working life, had better confidence pre-intervention but it became insignificant post-intervention. <em>Conclusion:</em> Knowledge of FMS was good but their confidence was low pre-intervention. They improved significantly post-intervention. It is hoped that the improvement can allow for earlier detection of leprosy to prevent clinical and epidemiological sequelae.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery-JDDS","volume":"20 1","pages":"Pages 46-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jdds.2015.11.005","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery-JDDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352241015000614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Family Medicine Specialists (FMS) play a pivotal role in the detection of leprosy in primary care. This study determines the knowledge and confidence among FMS in Malaysia. Method: Pre-intervention questionnaire was conducted followed by a 3 day educational intervention. Post-intervention questionnaire was conducted again 2 months thereafter. The questionnaire assessed knowledge and confidence in the diagnosis and management of leprosy. Results: The mean total mark for the pre-intervention knowledge questionnaires was 35.4 out of 50 and the mean confidence was 4.0 out of 10 for diagnosis and 3.3 out of 10 for management. Knowledge improved 24.0% post-intervention (p < 0.001). Knowledge on pathogenesis and clinical features improved the most with 38.5% and 32.4% respectively whereas knowledge on leprosy reactions improved the least with only 15.1%. The confidence level improved 85% to 7.4 for diagnosis and 118.2% to 7.2 for management post-intervention (p < 0.001). FMS with more experience, seeing more than 5 patients in their working life, had better confidence pre-intervention but it became insignificant post-intervention. Conclusion: Knowledge of FMS was good but their confidence was low pre-intervention. They improved significantly post-intervention. It is hoped that the improvement can allow for earlier detection of leprosy to prevent clinical and epidemiological sequelae.

马来西亚家庭医学专家对麻风病诊断和管理的知识和信心
背景:家庭医学专家(FMS)在初级保健中发现麻风方面发挥着关键作用。本研究确定了马来西亚FMS的知识和信心。方法:进行干预前问卷调查,然后进行为期3天的教育干预。2个月后再次进行干预后问卷调查。问卷评估了麻风病诊断和管理方面的知识和信心。结果:干预前知识问卷的平均总分为35.4分(满分50分),诊断的平均置信度为4.0分(满分10分),管理的平均置信度为3.3分(满分10分)。干预后知识水平提高24.0% (p <0.001)。对麻风发病机制和临床特征的了解分别提高了38.5%和32.4%,而对麻风反应的了解提高最少,仅为15.1%。诊断置信水平提高85%至7.4,干预后管理置信水平提高118.2%至7.2 (p <0.001)。经验越丰富的FMS,在工作生涯中见过5个以上的患者,干预前的自信心越好,干预后的自信心越不显著。结论:干预前患者对FMS的认知较好,但自信心较低。他们在干预后显著改善。希望这一改进可以使麻风病的早期发现,以防止临床和流行病学的后遗症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信