Malditos os que têm Fome e Sede de Justiça: discursos cristãos neoconservadores e lógicas neoliberais na educação brasileira

Q4 Social Sciences
G. Oliveira, Anna Oliveira
{"title":"Malditos os que têm Fome e Sede de Justiça: discursos cristãos neoconservadores e lógicas neoliberais na educação brasileira","authors":"G. Oliveira, Anna Oliveira","doi":"10.35786/1645-1384.v22.1155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of bolsonarismo brought to the center of the Brazilian public scene a process of alliance and articulation between defenders of neoliberalism, Christian neoconservative groups and people aligned with a project to strengthen militarism and return to political authoritarianism. The performance of ecclesiastical, political and media leaders became crucial to build a grammar of meanings and a dynamic of subjective identification for the movement. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the investigation of how this process of articulation developed, in the field of education, through a discursive analysis of actions, public statements and social practices of agents involved in Brazilian educational politics between 2012 and 2022. We inquiry the reality that most Brazilian Christian churches and communities (both Catholics and Evangelicals) still support and are supported by strongly colonial models of faith and religious life and that there is no way to deepen the questioning on the contradictions and limits of these identifications and political projects without facing the theological-political debate as part of the public debate in the field of education.","PeriodicalId":39270,"journal":{"name":"Curriculo sem Fronteiras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculo sem Fronteiras","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35786/1645-1384.v22.1155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of bolsonarismo brought to the center of the Brazilian public scene a process of alliance and articulation between defenders of neoliberalism, Christian neoconservative groups and people aligned with a project to strengthen militarism and return to political authoritarianism. The performance of ecclesiastical, political and media leaders became crucial to build a grammar of meanings and a dynamic of subjective identification for the movement. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the investigation of how this process of articulation developed, in the field of education, through a discursive analysis of actions, public statements and social practices of agents involved in Brazilian educational politics between 2012 and 2022. We inquiry the reality that most Brazilian Christian churches and communities (both Catholics and Evangelicals) still support and are supported by strongly colonial models of faith and religious life and that there is no way to deepen the questioning on the contradictions and limits of these identifications and political projects without facing the theological-political debate as part of the public debate in the field of education.
那些渴望正义的人被诅咒了:巴西教育中的新保守主义基督教话语和新自由主义逻辑
bolsonarismo的出现将新自由主义的捍卫者,基督教新保守主义团体和与加强军国主义和回归政治威权主义的计划一致的人之间的联盟和联系带到了巴西公共舞台的中心。教会、政治和媒体领袖的表现对于为这场运动建立意义语法和主观认同的动力至关重要。本文的目的是通过对2012年至2022年期间参与巴西教育政治的行动者的行动、公开声明和社会实践的话语分析,促进对这一表述过程如何在教育领域发展的调查。我们探究的现实是,大多数巴西基督教会和社区(包括天主教徒和福音派教徒)仍然支持并受到强烈的殖民信仰和宗教生活模式的支持,如果不面对神学-政治辩论作为教育领域公共辩论的一部分,就没有办法加深对这些认同和政治项目的矛盾和局限性的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Curriculo sem Fronteiras
Curriculo sem Fronteiras Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信