Preliminary Report of the Safety and Tolerability of 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.

IF 2.6 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Roman Gersner, Lindsay M Oberman, Maria J Sanchez, Nicolas Chiriboga, Harper L Kaye, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Abraham Zangen, Alexander Rotenberg
{"title":"Preliminary Report of the Safety and Tolerability of 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.","authors":"Roman Gersner,&nbsp;Lindsay M Oberman,&nbsp;Maria J Sanchez,&nbsp;Nicolas Chiriboga,&nbsp;Harper L Kaye,&nbsp;Alvaro Pascual-Leone,&nbsp;Abraham Zangen,&nbsp;Alexander Rotenberg","doi":"10.1177/11795735221088522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low frequency (≤1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to suppress cortical excitability and is beginning to be trialed for the treatment of refractory epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As a step toward a larger trial, the current pilot study was aimed to test the tolerability and safety of temporal lobe rTMS using H-coil for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>1800 pulses of active or sham rTMS were applied 5  days a week for 2 weeks over the temporal lobe of the affected hemisphere.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine participants were enrolled and randomized to verum or sham stimulation. One participant dropped out from the sham group after 5 rTMS sessions. In-session, 3 patients had typical seizures during sham stimulation. One patient had seizures also during active stimulation (albeit fewer than during sham). Minor reported adverse events during stimulation otherwise included transient neck pain and headache, and were reported in equal numbers in both groups. Major adverse events were not reported. Our results indicate that H-coil rTMS was well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the relatively high prevalence of individuals with TLE who are treatment-resistant and the preliminary results of this study, we suggest that a larger safety and efficacy trial of 1 Hz rTMS for the treatment of TLE is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/0c/10.1177_11795735221088522.PMC9092568.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735221088522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Low frequency (≤1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to suppress cortical excitability and is beginning to be trialed for the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Purpose: As a step toward a larger trial, the current pilot study was aimed to test the tolerability and safety of temporal lobe rTMS using H-coil for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

Research design: 1800 pulses of active or sham rTMS were applied 5  days a week for 2 weeks over the temporal lobe of the affected hemisphere.

Results: Nine participants were enrolled and randomized to verum or sham stimulation. One participant dropped out from the sham group after 5 rTMS sessions. In-session, 3 patients had typical seizures during sham stimulation. One patient had seizures also during active stimulation (albeit fewer than during sham). Minor reported adverse events during stimulation otherwise included transient neck pain and headache, and were reported in equal numbers in both groups. Major adverse events were not reported. Our results indicate that H-coil rTMS was well-tolerated.

Conclusion: Given the relatively high prevalence of individuals with TLE who are treatment-resistant and the preliminary results of this study, we suggest that a larger safety and efficacy trial of 1 Hz rTMS for the treatment of TLE is warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

1hz反复经颅磁刺激治疗颞叶癫痫的安全性和耐受性的初步报告。
背景:低频(≤1hz)重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)已被证明可以抑制皮质兴奋性,并开始用于治疗难治性癫痫的试验。目的:作为迈向更大规模试验的一步,目前的试点研究旨在测试使用h -线圈的颞叶rTMS治疗颞叶癫痫(TLE)的耐受性和安全性。研究设计:在受影响半球的颞叶上施加1800次主动或假性rTMS脉冲,每周5天,持续2周。结果:9名参与者被随机分为真假刺激组和假刺激组。一名参与者在5次rTMS治疗后退出了假手术组。在治疗期间,3例患者在假刺激期间出现典型的癫痫发作。一名患者在积极刺激期间也有癫痫发作(尽管少于假刺激)。在刺激期间报告的轻微不良事件包括短暂的颈部疼痛和头痛,两组报告的数量相同。主要不良事件未见报道。我们的结果表明,h圈rTMS耐受性良好。结论:鉴于TLE耐药患者的患病率相对较高,以及本研究的初步结果,我们建议进行更大规模的1hz rTMS治疗TLE的安全性和有效性试验是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信