Linguistic indicators of text quality in analytical texts: developmental changes and sensitivity to pedagogical work (Indicadores lingüísticos de la calidad textual en los textos analíticos: cambios evolutivos y sensibilidad al trabajo pedagógico)

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
M. Aparici, Rocío Cuberos, Naymé-Daniela Salas, Elisa Rosado
{"title":"Linguistic indicators of text quality in analytical texts: developmental changes and sensitivity to pedagogical work (Indicadores lingüísticos de la calidad textual en los textos analíticos: cambios evolutivos y sensibilidad al trabajo pedagógico)","authors":"M. Aparici, Rocío Cuberos, Naymé-Daniela Salas, Elisa Rosado","doi":"10.1080/02103702.2020.1848093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mastering analytical writing involves the proficient use of varied later-acquired grammatical, lexical and discourse forms and functions. Developmental studies have identified specific linguistic features as diagnostic of increasing proficiency. This study examines how these features change throughout educational levels and before and after the implementation of a set of classroom activities aimed at homogenizing participants’ pedagogical input while raising their awareness of analytical texts’ main functions. Two hundred and twelve Spanish speakers from primary, secondary and university levels participate in the study, each producing two analytical texts. The corpus consists of 424 texts produced on the same topic. Results indicate that not all the features pertaining to the same domain show identical changes across educational levels or are identically sensitive to pedagogical work. Productivity measures increase with educational level and after pedagogical work, except for university students. Most lexical, syntactic and discourse-level measures improve with educational level, though their sensitivity to pedagogical work is not straightforward. Findings suggest the need to evaluate writing quality at a high level of granularity.","PeriodicalId":51988,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Education and Development","volume":"3 1","pages":"9 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2020.1848093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Mastering analytical writing involves the proficient use of varied later-acquired grammatical, lexical and discourse forms and functions. Developmental studies have identified specific linguistic features as diagnostic of increasing proficiency. This study examines how these features change throughout educational levels and before and after the implementation of a set of classroom activities aimed at homogenizing participants’ pedagogical input while raising their awareness of analytical texts’ main functions. Two hundred and twelve Spanish speakers from primary, secondary and university levels participate in the study, each producing two analytical texts. The corpus consists of 424 texts produced on the same topic. Results indicate that not all the features pertaining to the same domain show identical changes across educational levels or are identically sensitive to pedagogical work. Productivity measures increase with educational level and after pedagogical work, except for university students. Most lexical, syntactic and discourse-level measures improve with educational level, though their sensitivity to pedagogical work is not straightforward. Findings suggest the need to evaluate writing quality at a high level of granularity.
分析文本文本质量的语言指标:对教学工作的发展变化和敏感性
掌握分析性写作涉及到熟练使用各种后来习得的语法、词汇和话语形式和功能。发展研究已经确定了特定的语言特征作为熟练程度提高的诊断。本研究考察了这些特征在整个教育水平以及实施一系列课堂活动之前和之后是如何变化的,这些活动旨在使参与者的教学投入同质化,同时提高他们对分析文本主要功能的认识。来自小学、中学和大学的212名西班牙语使用者参与了这项研究,每人编写两篇分析文本。该语料库由424个相同主题的文本组成。结果表明,并非所有属于同一领域的特征在不同的教育水平上都表现出相同的变化,或者对教学工作同样敏感。生产率指标随着教育水平的提高和教学工作的结束而增加,但大学生除外。大多数词汇、句法和语篇层面的措施随着教育水平的提高而提高,尽管它们对教学工作的敏感性并不直接。研究结果表明,需要在高粒度水平上评估写作质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信