Vaccine equity and access: A comparative assessment of Covaxin, Covishield, and Sputnik V.

Avinash Teli, P. Rathore, Rohit Kumar, M. S. Alam
{"title":"Vaccine equity and access: A comparative assessment of Covaxin, Covishield, and Sputnik V.","authors":"Avinash Teli, P. Rathore, Rohit Kumar, M. S. Alam","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpp.2023.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The RNA virus known as SARS-CoV-2, which causes severe acute respiratory syndrome, was discovered for the first time in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a global pandemic on March 11, 2020, as a result of the virus's subsequent spread throughout the planet. The urgent creation of safe and effective vaccines has elevated to a top priority in the global healthcare industry because of the terrible effects of the COVID-19 outbreak. The Covaxin and Covishield vaccines were administered as part of the start of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign in India on January 13, 2021. Covaxin is made up of adjuvant-inactivated viral particles, whereas Covishield is an adenovirus vector-based vaccine. The utility and effectiveness of each vaccine are significantly influenced by its formulation, adjuvants, and mode of action. Vaccine efficacy depends on various factors, including the creation of memory cells, cell-mediated immunity, and antibodies. Results from third-phase trials have shown that Covishield exhibits an effectiveness of approximately 90%, while Covaxin demonstrates an effectiveness of around 80%. Both vaccines have demonstrated satisfactory efficacy against several mutant variants of SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of Covishield, however, should be noted as compromised if there are significant changes in the spike (S) protein structure in future variants. In contrast, Covaxin may remain effective against such variants due to its ability to elicit multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes. The objective of this study is to evaluate and contrast Covaxin, Covishield & Sputnik v immunogenic and therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, potential vaccination challenges in the coming days will be discussed. Understanding the relative strengths and limitations of these vaccines can inform decision-making and strategies related to vaccine deployment, public health interventions, and future vaccine development efforts.\"","PeriodicalId":13313,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpp.2023.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The RNA virus known as SARS-CoV-2, which causes severe acute respiratory syndrome, was discovered for the first time in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a global pandemic on March 11, 2020, as a result of the virus's subsequent spread throughout the planet. The urgent creation of safe and effective vaccines has elevated to a top priority in the global healthcare industry because of the terrible effects of the COVID-19 outbreak. The Covaxin and Covishield vaccines were administered as part of the start of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign in India on January 13, 2021. Covaxin is made up of adjuvant-inactivated viral particles, whereas Covishield is an adenovirus vector-based vaccine. The utility and effectiveness of each vaccine are significantly influenced by its formulation, adjuvants, and mode of action. Vaccine efficacy depends on various factors, including the creation of memory cells, cell-mediated immunity, and antibodies. Results from third-phase trials have shown that Covishield exhibits an effectiveness of approximately 90%, while Covaxin demonstrates an effectiveness of around 80%. Both vaccines have demonstrated satisfactory efficacy against several mutant variants of SARS-CoV-2. The effectiveness of Covishield, however, should be noted as compromised if there are significant changes in the spike (S) protein structure in future variants. In contrast, Covaxin may remain effective against such variants due to its ability to elicit multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes. The objective of this study is to evaluate and contrast Covaxin, Covishield & Sputnik v immunogenic and therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, potential vaccination challenges in the coming days will be discussed. Understanding the relative strengths and limitations of these vaccines can inform decision-making and strategies related to vaccine deployment, public health interventions, and future vaccine development efforts."
疫苗公平和获取:Covaxin、Covishield和Sputnik V的比较评估。
导致严重急性呼吸系统综合征的RNA病毒SARS-CoV-2于2019年12月在中国武汉首次被发现。由于该病毒随后在全球传播,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)于2020年3月11日宣布此次疫情为全球大流行。由于新冠肺炎疫情的可怕影响,紧急研制安全有效的疫苗已成为全球医疗保健行业的首要任务。Covaxin和Covishield疫苗是2021年1月13日在印度开始的SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种运动的一部分。Covaxin由佐剂灭活的病毒颗粒组成,而Covishield是一种基于腺病毒载体的疫苗。每种疫苗的效用和有效性受其配方、佐剂和作用方式的显著影响。疫苗的效力取决于多种因素,包括记忆细胞的产生、细胞介导的免疫和抗体。第三阶段试验的结果表明,Covishield的有效性约为90%,而Covaxin的有效性约为80%。这两种疫苗已证明对几种SARS-CoV-2突变变体具有令人满意的疗效。然而,如果在未来的变异中刺突(S)蛋白结构发生重大变化,Covishield的有效性就会受到损害。相比之下,由于Covaxin能够引发针对不同表位的多种抗体,因此它可能对这些变异仍然有效。本研究的目的是评价和比较Covaxin, Covishield & Sputnik v的免疫原性和治疗效果。此外,将讨论未来几天可能面临的疫苗接种挑战。了解这些疫苗的相对优势和局限性可以为与疫苗部署、公共卫生干预和未来疫苗开发工作相关的决策和战略提供信息。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信