L’«apprendimento insegnato»: valutazione per l’apprendimento vs. valutazione dell’apprendimento

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
C. L. Rocca, R. Capobianco
{"title":"L’«apprendimento insegnato»: valutazione per l’apprendimento vs. valutazione dell’apprendimento","authors":"C. L. Rocca, R. Capobianco","doi":"10.7358/ECPS-2016-014-ROCC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we present the procedures and the results of an observational study carried out in the first half of AS 2015/2016 into two 3th classes of the Professional Institute of Palestrina (RM) and carried out as part of the PRIN Research (2013-2016). In one of the classes, considered as experimental class, the model of Didactic Modular Integrated Strategy (in Italian – SDiMI) was applied, in the other one, considered as the control class, the traditional teaching was continued to use. The SDiMI model, to which the teachers of the experimental class were formed, respect to the different elements that compose it, provides the application of the assessment as training function. In the time period of the teaching/evaluation intervention observation, two standardized questionnaires (in input and output), about the type of assessment used in class (Alkharusi, 2015; in Italian translation) were administered to teachers and students. Assessment tests (objective and semi-structured tests) were administered to the students. The analysis of the data showed a marked improvement in the experimental class, compared to the control class, of both the assessment activities used in training function, detected through the questionnaires, and the outcome of the students’ performance, especially in the reading tests and in the semistructured logical-mathematical test.","PeriodicalId":41872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"101 1","pages":"83-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2016-014-ROCC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper we present the procedures and the results of an observational study carried out in the first half of AS 2015/2016 into two 3th classes of the Professional Institute of Palestrina (RM) and carried out as part of the PRIN Research (2013-2016). In one of the classes, considered as experimental class, the model of Didactic Modular Integrated Strategy (in Italian – SDiMI) was applied, in the other one, considered as the control class, the traditional teaching was continued to use. The SDiMI model, to which the teachers of the experimental class were formed, respect to the different elements that compose it, provides the application of the assessment as training function. In the time period of the teaching/evaluation intervention observation, two standardized questionnaires (in input and output), about the type of assessment used in class (Alkharusi, 2015; in Italian translation) were administered to teachers and students. Assessment tests (objective and semi-structured tests) were administered to the students. The analysis of the data showed a marked improvement in the experimental class, compared to the control class, of both the assessment activities used in training function, detected through the questionnaires, and the outcome of the students’ performance, especially in the reading tests and in the semistructured logical-mathematical test.
“教学学习”:学习评估与学习评估
在本文中,我们介绍了2015/2016年上半年在帕莱斯特里纳专业研究所(RM)的两个第3班进行的观察性研究的过程和结果,该研究作为PRIN研究(2013-2016)的一部分进行。其中一个班作为实验班,采用教学模块化集成策略模式(意大利语- SDiMI),另一个班作为控制班,继续使用传统教学。实验班教师组成的SDiMI模型,就组成该模型的不同要素而言,提供了评估作为培训功能的应用。在教学/评估干预观察期间,针对课堂上使用的评估类型进行了两份标准化问卷(输入和输出)(Alkharusi, 2015;(意大利语翻译)对教师和学生进行了管理。对学生进行评估测试(客观测试和半结构化测试)。数据分析表明,实验班在通过问卷调查检测到的训练功能的评估活动和学生的表现结果,特别是在阅读测试和半结构化逻辑数学测试中,与控制班相比,有明显的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信