Unification of Tarekat in Indonesia: A Critical Review

Ziaulhaq Hidayat
{"title":"Unification of Tarekat in Indonesia: A Critical Review","authors":"Ziaulhaq Hidayat","doi":"10.53802/hikmah.v19i2.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to conduct a critical review of a dissertation on the unification of tarekat in Indonesia. To understand how critical review works, a summary will be made of the dissertation that is used as the object of study. The critical review work step is carried out by trying to present an overview of the dissertation that will be critically reviewed to provide an overview of the material being analyzed. Content analysis is a characteristic of this study, with which opinion interpretations are carried out. The findings of the study explain that this dissertation explains that the Sufistic thoughts of Ahmad Khatib Sambas are considered unique compared to other Sufis, because Ahmad Khatib Sambas succeeded in combining two large orders, namely the Qadiriyah and Naqsyabandiyah Orders which then taught them separately. Apart from that, this tarekat has a quite prominent spirit of activism, as evidenced by several resistance movements against colonialism sponsored by followers of the Qadiriyah and Naqsyabandiyah Tarekat. The results of the critical review show that this research has not succeeded in answering what is at the core of the research problem. The research findings presented are too broad, so they do not focus on the main discussion. In addition, this study also failed to present novelty from previous studies.","PeriodicalId":32063,"journal":{"name":"Hikmah Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hikmah Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53802/hikmah.v19i2.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a critical review of a dissertation on the unification of tarekat in Indonesia. To understand how critical review works, a summary will be made of the dissertation that is used as the object of study. The critical review work step is carried out by trying to present an overview of the dissertation that will be critically reviewed to provide an overview of the material being analyzed. Content analysis is a characteristic of this study, with which opinion interpretations are carried out. The findings of the study explain that this dissertation explains that the Sufistic thoughts of Ahmad Khatib Sambas are considered unique compared to other Sufis, because Ahmad Khatib Sambas succeeded in combining two large orders, namely the Qadiriyah and Naqsyabandiyah Orders which then taught them separately. Apart from that, this tarekat has a quite prominent spirit of activism, as evidenced by several resistance movements against colonialism sponsored by followers of the Qadiriyah and Naqsyabandiyah Tarekat. The results of the critical review show that this research has not succeeded in answering what is at the core of the research problem. The research findings presented are too broad, so they do not focus on the main discussion. In addition, this study also failed to present novelty from previous studies.
印尼塔雷卡特的统一:一个批判性的回顾
本研究旨在对一篇关于印度尼西亚塔雷卡特统一的论文进行批判性审查。为了了解批判性审查是如何工作的,将对作为研究对象的论文进行总结。批判性审查工作步骤是通过尝试提出论文的概述,将进行批判性审查,以提供正在分析的材料的概述来进行的。内容分析是本研究的一个特点,通过内容分析进行意见解释。研究结果解释了这篇论文解释了Ahmad Khatib Sambas的苏菲主义思想与其他苏菲派相比被认为是独特的,因为Ahmad Khatib Sambas成功地结合了两个大的订单,即Qadiriyah和Naqsyabandiyah订单,然后分别教授他们。除此之外,这个tarekat具有相当突出的行动主义精神,由Qadiriyah和Naqsyabandiyah tarekat的追随者发起的几次反对殖民主义的抵抗运动证明了这一点。批判性评论的结果表明,这项研究并没有成功地回答研究问题的核心。所提出的研究结果过于宽泛,因此没有集中在主要讨论上。此外,本研究也未能呈现出以往研究的新颖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信