Efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs using data envelopment analysis and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis

IF 1.1 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Xiaoqi Zhang, Qiong Xia, Fangqing Wei, Sheng Ang
{"title":"Efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs using data envelopment analysis and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis","authors":"Xiaoqi Zhang, Qiong Xia, Fangqing Wei, Sheng Ang","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2023.2191533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The generalized equilibrium efficient frontier data envelopment analysis (GEEFDEA) approach, an extension of the DEA method, has been widely used to solve the problem of evaluating decision making units (DMUs) producing fixed-sum outputs. It constructs a common equilibrium efficient frontier through a minimum reduction strategy for fixed-sum outputs and uses this frontier as a benchmark to achieve a complete ranking of DMUs. However, the existence of multiple feasible equilibrium efficient frontiers may lead to inconsistency in the evaluation criteria, and this possibility limits the method’s usefulness. In this paper, an integrated framework for solving this problem is proposed to rank DMUs by using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA-2) method combined with the GEEFDEA approach. Instead of using a certain common equilibrium efficient frontier as in conventional GEEFDEA approaches, we explore all possible frontiers to answer various robustness questions by computing rank acceptability indices and pairwise winning indices. Furthermore, we derive the complete ranking from the dominance relationships among the DMUs. Two numerical examples are used to demonstrate the effectiveness and rationality of the proposed hybrid approach.","PeriodicalId":13645,"journal":{"name":"Infor","volume":"41 1","pages":"419 - 444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infor","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.2023.2191533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The generalized equilibrium efficient frontier data envelopment analysis (GEEFDEA) approach, an extension of the DEA method, has been widely used to solve the problem of evaluating decision making units (DMUs) producing fixed-sum outputs. It constructs a common equilibrium efficient frontier through a minimum reduction strategy for fixed-sum outputs and uses this frontier as a benchmark to achieve a complete ranking of DMUs. However, the existence of multiple feasible equilibrium efficient frontiers may lead to inconsistency in the evaluation criteria, and this possibility limits the method’s usefulness. In this paper, an integrated framework for solving this problem is proposed to rank DMUs by using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA-2) method combined with the GEEFDEA approach. Instead of using a certain common equilibrium efficient frontier as in conventional GEEFDEA approaches, we explore all possible frontiers to answer various robustness questions by computing rank acceptability indices and pairwise winning indices. Furthermore, we derive the complete ranking from the dominance relationships among the DMUs. Two numerical examples are used to demonstrate the effectiveness and rationality of the proposed hybrid approach.
基于数据包络分析和随机多准则可接受性分析的定和产出决策单元效率评价
摘要广义均衡有效前沿数据包络分析(GEEFDEA)方法是DEA方法的扩展,已被广泛用于求解决策单元产生定和产出的评价问题。通过定和产出的最小约简策略,构建了一个共同均衡有效边界,并以此边界为基准,实现了对dmu的完整排序。然而,由于存在多个可行平衡有效边界,可能导致评价标准不一致,从而限制了该方法的实用性。本文采用随机多准则可接受性分析(SMAA-2)方法与GEEFDEA方法相结合,提出了一种解决该问题的综合框架。与传统GEEFDEA方法中使用某个共同的均衡有效边界不同,我们通过计算等级可接受指数和成对获胜指数来探索所有可能的边界来回答各种鲁棒性问题。此外,我们从dmu之间的优势关系推导出完整的排名。通过两个算例验证了所提混合方法的有效性和合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infor
Infor 管理科学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research is published and sponsored by the Canadian Operational Research Society. It provides its readers with papers on a powerful combination of subjects: Information Systems and Operational Research. The importance of combining IS and OR in one journal is that both aim to expand quantitative scientific approaches to management. With this integration, the theory, methodology, and practice of OR and IS are thoroughly examined. INFOR is available in print and online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信