Wilder’s Joyce: Inspiration, Borrowing, Appropriation, Plagiarism

S. Gontarski
{"title":"Wilder’s Joyce: Inspiration, Borrowing, Appropriation, Plagiarism","authors":"S. Gontarski","doi":"10.11606/issn.2595-8127.v25i1p29-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American novelist and playwright Thornton Wilder’s lifelong attraction to and passion for if not obsession with the work of James Joyce has led to unintended consequences. Wilder was writing what would become his second Pulitzer Prize winning play, The Skin of Our Teeth, while in the midst of “unriddling” Joyce’s final novel, Finnegans Wake. Accusations of plagiarism would subsequently arise from two major Joyce scholars, Joseph Campbell and Henry Morton Robinson as they raised questions about the tipping point in creative practice, the point at which common practices of textual influence and reference cross the line into excessive borrowings and plagiarism. Such accusations, which Wilder failed to acknowledge and to fully address in a timely fashion, have lingered to his discredit and have obscured his achievements both as a playwright and a major scholar of experimental literature with a particular emphasis on James Joyce. The essay details the need to return to and to reassess the issues of Wilder’s creative practice within the current theoretical climate of intertextuality and thus to reassess Wilder’s pioneering work on both Ulysses and Finnegans Wake.","PeriodicalId":52691,"journal":{"name":"ABEI Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABEI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2595-8127.v25i1p29-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

American novelist and playwright Thornton Wilder’s lifelong attraction to and passion for if not obsession with the work of James Joyce has led to unintended consequences. Wilder was writing what would become his second Pulitzer Prize winning play, The Skin of Our Teeth, while in the midst of “unriddling” Joyce’s final novel, Finnegans Wake. Accusations of plagiarism would subsequently arise from two major Joyce scholars, Joseph Campbell and Henry Morton Robinson as they raised questions about the tipping point in creative practice, the point at which common practices of textual influence and reference cross the line into excessive borrowings and plagiarism. Such accusations, which Wilder failed to acknowledge and to fully address in a timely fashion, have lingered to his discredit and have obscured his achievements both as a playwright and a major scholar of experimental literature with a particular emphasis on James Joyce. The essay details the need to return to and to reassess the issues of Wilder’s creative practice within the current theoretical climate of intertextuality and thus to reassess Wilder’s pioneering work on both Ulysses and Finnegans Wake.
怀尔德的乔伊斯:灵感,借用,挪用,剽窃
美国小说家和剧作家桑顿·怀尔德对詹姆斯·乔伊斯的作品的终身迷恋和热情(如果不是痴迷的话)导致了意想不到的后果。怀尔德正在创作他的第二部普利策奖获奖剧本《我们的牙齿的皮肤》,当时他正在“解密”乔伊斯的最后一部小说《芬尼根守灵夜》。随后,两位主要的乔伊斯学者约瑟夫·坎贝尔(Joseph Campbell)和亨利·莫顿·罗宾逊(Henry Morton Robinson)提出了剽窃指控,因为他们对创作实践中的临界点提出了质疑,在这个临界点上,文本影响和参考的常见做法越过了过度借用和剽窃的界限。怀尔德没有及时承认并充分回应这些指控,这些指控一直困扰着他的名誉,也掩盖了他作为剧作家和实验文学主要学者(尤其是詹姆斯·乔伊斯)的成就。本文详细介绍了在当前互文性的理论气候下,重新评估怀尔德的创作实践问题的必要性,从而重新评估怀尔德在《尤利西斯》和《芬尼根守夜》上的开创性工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信