Is Tumour Thickness Measurement Required for MOLES Scoring of Melanocytic Choroidal Tumours?

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ocular Oncology and Pathology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-10 DOI:10.1159/000529862
Jared Ching, Lamis AlHarby, Mandeep S Sagoo, Bertil Damato
{"title":"Is Tumour Thickness Measurement Required for MOLES Scoring of Melanocytic Choroidal Tumours?","authors":"Jared Ching, Lamis AlHarby, Mandeep S Sagoo, Bertil Damato","doi":"10.1159/000529862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It can be challenging to distinguish between choroidal naevi and melanomas in the community setting, particularly without access to ultrasonography (US), required to measure the thickness of melanocytic choroidal tumours. We aimed to determine whether thickness measurement is required for MOLES scoring of melanocytic choroidal tumours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The dataset of a recent MOLES evaluation was reviewed. Patients were selected for the present study if their MOLES tumour size category was determined by tumour thickness measured with US. The largest basal tumour diameter and tumour thickness were then measured from ultra-widefield fundus images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tumour size category was determined by tumour diameter in 203/222 (91.4%) with no influence of tumour thickness. The tumour thickness influenced the MOLES score in 19/222 (8.6%) patients. In 11/19 patients with OCT measurements of tumour thickness, the US measurement exceeded the OCT by more than 25% in 5 patients, more than 50% in 2 patients, and more than 75% in 1 patient. As a result, the revised tumour thickness based on OCT determined the size category in 4/216 (1.8%) patients. The ultra-widefield fundus images measurements increased the diameter score by 1 in 5 patients. As a result, the revised tumour thickness determined the size category in 4/216 (1.8%) patients. If both the revised diameter and thickness scores were considered, the MOLES score reduced in 4 patients. If both the diameter and thickness scores were considered, the MOLES score reduced in 5 and increased in 1. Only 0.94% (2/211) of melanocytic choroidal tumours assessed with MOLES when using Optos ultra-widefield fundus images diameter and OCT to measure tumour diameter and thickness, respectively, required a change in management from a reduction in MOLES score from 1 to 0.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that the MOLES category for size is influenced more by the tumour diameter, if it can be measured accurately, than by the thickness. This study suggests ignoring tumour thickness if this cannot be measured accurately with OCT, unless the tumour has a mushroom shape.</p>","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10821789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: It can be challenging to distinguish between choroidal naevi and melanomas in the community setting, particularly without access to ultrasonography (US), required to measure the thickness of melanocytic choroidal tumours. We aimed to determine whether thickness measurement is required for MOLES scoring of melanocytic choroidal tumours.

Methods: The dataset of a recent MOLES evaluation was reviewed. Patients were selected for the present study if their MOLES tumour size category was determined by tumour thickness measured with US. The largest basal tumour diameter and tumour thickness were then measured from ultra-widefield fundus images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, respectively.

Results: The tumour size category was determined by tumour diameter in 203/222 (91.4%) with no influence of tumour thickness. The tumour thickness influenced the MOLES score in 19/222 (8.6%) patients. In 11/19 patients with OCT measurements of tumour thickness, the US measurement exceeded the OCT by more than 25% in 5 patients, more than 50% in 2 patients, and more than 75% in 1 patient. As a result, the revised tumour thickness based on OCT determined the size category in 4/216 (1.8%) patients. The ultra-widefield fundus images measurements increased the diameter score by 1 in 5 patients. As a result, the revised tumour thickness determined the size category in 4/216 (1.8%) patients. If both the revised diameter and thickness scores were considered, the MOLES score reduced in 4 patients. If both the diameter and thickness scores were considered, the MOLES score reduced in 5 and increased in 1. Only 0.94% (2/211) of melanocytic choroidal tumours assessed with MOLES when using Optos ultra-widefield fundus images diameter and OCT to measure tumour diameter and thickness, respectively, required a change in management from a reduction in MOLES score from 1 to 0.

Discussion/conclusion: This study suggests that the MOLES category for size is influenced more by the tumour diameter, if it can be measured accurately, than by the thickness. This study suggests ignoring tumour thickness if this cannot be measured accurately with OCT, unless the tumour has a mushroom shape.

黑色素细胞脉络膜肿瘤的 MOLES 评分是否需要测量肿瘤厚度?
导言:在社区环境中区分脉络膜痣和黑色素瘤是一项挑战,尤其是在没有超声波检查(US)的情况下,而超声波检查是测量黑色素细胞脉络膜肿瘤厚度所必需的。我们旨在确定黑色素细胞脉络膜瘤的 MOLES 评分是否需要测量厚度:方法:我们回顾了最近一次 MOLES 评估的数据集。如果患者的 MOLES 肿瘤大小类别是通过 US 测量的肿瘤厚度确定的,则将其选入本研究。然后分别从超宽域眼底图像和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像中测量肿瘤的最大基底直径和肿瘤厚度:203/222(91.4%)例患者的肿瘤大小类别由肿瘤直径决定,肿瘤厚度对其没有影响。19/222(8.6%)名患者的 MOLES 评分受肿瘤厚度影响。在 11/19 名通过 OCT 测量肿瘤厚度的患者中,5 名患者的 US 测量值超过 OCT 测量值的 25%,2 名患者超过 50%,1 名患者超过 75%。因此,在 216 例患者中,有 4 例(1.8%)的肿瘤大小是根据 OCT 测量的肿瘤厚度确定的。超宽视野眼底图像测量使 5 名患者的直径得分增加了 1 分。因此,修正后的肿瘤厚度决定了 4/216 例(1.8%)患者的大小类别。如果同时考虑修正后的直径和厚度评分,则有 4 名患者的 MOLES 评分降低。在使用 Optos 超宽视场眼底图像直径和 OCT 分别测量肿瘤直径和厚度的情况下,只有 0.94% (2/211)的黑色素细胞脉络膜肿瘤在使用 MOLES 评估后需要改变管理,将 MOLES 分数从 1 降为 0:本研究表明,如果肿瘤直径可以准确测量,那么肿瘤大小的 MOLES 类别受肿瘤直径的影响比受肿瘤厚度的影响更大。本研究建议,如果无法通过 OCT 精确测量肿瘤厚度,则忽略肿瘤厚度,除非肿瘤呈蘑菇状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信