Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Yasuharu Nakashima, Daisuke Hara, Masanobu Ohishi, Goro Motomura, Ichiro Kawano, Satoshi Hamai, Shinya Kawahara, Taishi Sato, Ryosuke Yamaguchi, Takeshi Utsunomiya, Kenji Kitamura
{"title":"Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach.","authors":"Yasuharu Nakashima,&nbsp;Daisuke Hara,&nbsp;Masanobu Ohishi,&nbsp;Goro Motomura,&nbsp;Ichiro Kawano,&nbsp;Satoshi Hamai,&nbsp;Shinya Kawahara,&nbsp;Taishi Sato,&nbsp;Ryosuke Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Takeshi Utsunomiya,&nbsp;Kenji Kitamura","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnac047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To decrease hip abductor dysfunction after periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral/trochanteric approach, we aimed to modify transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA) to not cut the greater trochanter and abductor-iliac crest detachment. We subsequently compared abductor muscle strength recovery between TOAs with [conventional TOA (C-TOA)] and without [modified TOA (M-TOA)] trochanteric osteotomy. C-TOA and M-TOA were performed in 27 and 34 hips, respectively. Hip abduction, flexion and knee extension muscle strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 5, 10, 24 and 52 weeks postoperatively. The muscle strength ratio of the affected and contralateral lower limbs was compared between the C-TOA and M-TOA groups. Neither the mean Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score at the final follow-up nor the postoperative center-edge angle showed significant differences between the M-TOA and C-TOA groups (15.7 versus 16.4 points; <i>P</i> = 0.25 and 38.5° versus <i>P</i> = 0.62 and 39.8°, respectively). The mean muscle strength ratios of hip abduction at 5, 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively were significantly higher in the M-TOA group than in the C-TOA group (0.62 versus 0.39, 0.76 versus 0.59 and 0.94 versus 0.70; <i>P</i> = 0.03, 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups at Postoperative Week 52 (<i>P</i> = 0.36). Discomfort at the greater trochanter was observed in 18 hips (66.7%) in the C-TOA group but only in 4 hips (11.2%) in the M-TOA group. In conclusion, M-TOA is less invasive than C-TOA and allows an earlier recovery of abductor muscle strength without significant correction loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"9 4","pages":"259-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/25/hnac047.PMC9993449.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To decrease hip abductor dysfunction after periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral/trochanteric approach, we aimed to modify transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA) to not cut the greater trochanter and abductor-iliac crest detachment. We subsequently compared abductor muscle strength recovery between TOAs with [conventional TOA (C-TOA)] and without [modified TOA (M-TOA)] trochanteric osteotomy. C-TOA and M-TOA were performed in 27 and 34 hips, respectively. Hip abduction, flexion and knee extension muscle strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 5, 10, 24 and 52 weeks postoperatively. The muscle strength ratio of the affected and contralateral lower limbs was compared between the C-TOA and M-TOA groups. Neither the mean Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score at the final follow-up nor the postoperative center-edge angle showed significant differences between the M-TOA and C-TOA groups (15.7 versus 16.4 points; P = 0.25 and 38.5° versus P = 0.62 and 39.8°, respectively). The mean muscle strength ratios of hip abduction at 5, 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively were significantly higher in the M-TOA group than in the C-TOA group (0.62 versus 0.39, 0.76 versus 0.59 and 0.94 versus 0.70; P = 0.03, 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups at Postoperative Week 52 (P = 0.36). Discomfort at the greater trochanter was observed in 18 hips (66.7%) in the C-TOA group but only in 4 hips (11.2%) in the M-TOA group. In conclusion, M-TOA is less invasive than C-TOA and allows an earlier recovery of abductor muscle strength without significant correction loss.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外侧入路保肌髋臼周围截骨术后外展肌恢复。
为了减少髋臼周围行外侧/粗隆入路截骨后髋外展肌功能障碍,我们的目的是修改髋臼转位截骨术(TOA),使其不切割大转子和外展髂骨脱离。随后,我们比较了[常规TOA (C-TOA)]和[改良TOA (M-TOA)]转子截骨术的外展肌力量恢复情况。C-TOA和M-TOA分别在27髋和34髋进行。术前及术后3周、5周、10周、24周和52周分别测量髋关节外展、屈曲和膝关节伸肌力量。比较C-TOA组和M-TOA组患侧和对侧下肢肌力比。M-TOA组和C-TOA组在最后随访时Merle d' aubigne - postel平均评分和术后中心边缘角均无显著差异(15.7分对16.4分;P = 0.25和38.5°,P = 0.62和39.8°)。术后5周、12周和24周,M-TOA组髋外展的平均肌力比明显高于C-TOA组(0.62 vs 0.39, 0.76 vs 0.59, 0.94 vs 0.70;P分别= 0.03、0.04、0.01)。术后第52周各组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.36)。C-TOA组有18髋(66.7%)出现大转子不适,而M-TOA组只有4髋(11.2%)。综上所述,M-TOA比C-TOA侵入性更小,可以更早地恢复外展肌力量,而不会造成明显的矫正损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信