Tracing the Subjectivities of the Changing Human: Hegel, Self-Understanding, and Posthuman Objective Freedom

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rose
{"title":"Tracing the Subjectivities of the Changing Human: Hegel, Self-Understanding, and Posthuman Objective Freedom","authors":"Rose","doi":"10.5325/JPOSTSTUD.2.2.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Technological advances have a direct effect on the self-understanding of the human. The current article offers a diagnosis of changing social practices from a Hegelian philosophical–historical framework. Hegel has an interesting story to tell about the formation of modern identity and its connection to the institutions of justice and property. The modern, Enlightenment self is formed through a need for the rationalization of institutions of punishment and the economic material institutions of private property and capitalism. Such institutions form what he calls the objective freedom of a social fabric, or those institutions that ground and make intelligible the subjective self-understandings of the individuals. The modern subject understands itself as an intentional agent with individual and distinct wants, preferences, and goals atomistically existing within society, not because such an understanding is the best representation of an individual, but because the objective freedom of the society makes it necessarily so that the individual is constructed as an intentional agent and thus becomes one. The aim of this article is to explore and present Hegel’s dual concepts of objective and subjective freedom, to argue that the self is an artificial object, and to show that the Enlightenment self-understanding of an intentional agent is, due to specific technologies, undergoing a fundamental transformation. The main claim is that a new understanding of the “subject” is required to avoid unfreedom in the territorialization of the digital world and its information.","PeriodicalId":55935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Posthuman Studies-Philosophy Technology Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JPOSTSTUD.2.2.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Technological advances have a direct effect on the self-understanding of the human. The current article offers a diagnosis of changing social practices from a Hegelian philosophical–historical framework. Hegel has an interesting story to tell about the formation of modern identity and its connection to the institutions of justice and property. The modern, Enlightenment self is formed through a need for the rationalization of institutions of punishment and the economic material institutions of private property and capitalism. Such institutions form what he calls the objective freedom of a social fabric, or those institutions that ground and make intelligible the subjective self-understandings of the individuals. The modern subject understands itself as an intentional agent with individual and distinct wants, preferences, and goals atomistically existing within society, not because such an understanding is the best representation of an individual, but because the objective freedom of the society makes it necessarily so that the individual is constructed as an intentional agent and thus becomes one. The aim of this article is to explore and present Hegel’s dual concepts of objective and subjective freedom, to argue that the self is an artificial object, and to show that the Enlightenment self-understanding of an intentional agent is, due to specific technologies, undergoing a fundamental transformation. The main claim is that a new understanding of the “subject” is required to avoid unfreedom in the territorialization of the digital world and its information.
追寻人类变化的主体性:黑格尔、自我理解与后人类的客观自由
技术进步对人类的自我理解有直接的影响。本文从黑格尔哲学-历史框架出发,对不断变化的社会实践进行了诊断。黑格尔讲了一个有趣的故事,关于现代身份的形成及其与正义和财产制度的联系。现代的启蒙自我是通过对惩罚制度以及私有财产和资本主义的经济物质制度合理化的需要而形成的。这样的制度形成了他所谓的社会结构的客观自由,或者是那些使个人的主观自我理解成为基础和可理解的制度。现代主体将自己理解为一个有意识的主体,具有个体和独特的需求、偏好和目标,原子地存在于社会中,不是因为这样的理解是对个人的最佳代表,而是因为社会的客观自由使得个人必须被构建为一个有意识的主体,从而成为一个有意识的主体。本文的目的是探讨和呈现黑格尔关于客观自由和主观自由的双重概念,论证自我是一个人为的客体,并表明由于特定的技术,启蒙运动对有意主体的自我理解正在发生根本性的转变。主要主张是,需要对“主体”进行新的理解,以避免数字世界及其信息的领土化中的不自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信