Screening for Gestational Diabetes by DIPSI Guidelines

Aditi Phulpagar, P. Deshmukh, Anurag Gunderia
{"title":"Screening for Gestational Diabetes by DIPSI Guidelines","authors":"Aditi Phulpagar, P. Deshmukh, Anurag Gunderia","doi":"10.7439/IJBR.V9I3.4724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and Objectives: The present study was undertaken to find out the role and effectiveness of DIPSI guidelines as a replacement for other more time consuming and cost effective methods for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus ( GDM) in the Indian population and to compare outcome between GDM and non GDM population. Methods: A total of 345 women were selected of low risk category between the gestational ages of 24 to 28 weeks and were subjected to screening for gestational diabetes by DIPSI guidelines. A 75mg oral glucose load was given irrespective of their last Meal timing followed by blood glucose estimation by glucose oxidase – peroxidase method. A report of ≥140mg/dl were labeled as GDM as per DIPSI guidelines. Results: Out of 345 subjects screened, 30 (8.7%) were positive for GDM. The false positives encountered with DIPSI were 0.57% (2/345) and another 2 cases (0.57%) were false negative by DIPSI criteria. The rate of LSCS and rate of macrosomia was significantly higher in GDM population (30% and 33.33% respectively) as   compared to general population (4.4% and 2.5% respectively). In GDM group 23.3% (7) had Shoulder Dystocia compared with 0.6% (2) in the normal population. 10% were breech compared with only 0.2% in the general population with 1 IUFD requiring hysterotomy. The rates of CPD were also higher (3.3%) than the general population (1.5%). A total of 19 neonates required NICU admission of which 11 were IDM. 36.66% of IDM required NICU admission as compared to only 2.5% of the non diabetic population. Conclusions: DIPSI guidelines can use as a replacement for other more resource and time consuming and costly methods like ADA criteria for the detection of GDM in the low resource settings in developing countries.","PeriodicalId":13909,"journal":{"name":"International journal of biomedical research","volume":"31 1","pages":"121-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBR.V9I3.4724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: The present study was undertaken to find out the role and effectiveness of DIPSI guidelines as a replacement for other more time consuming and cost effective methods for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus ( GDM) in the Indian population and to compare outcome between GDM and non GDM population. Methods: A total of 345 women were selected of low risk category between the gestational ages of 24 to 28 weeks and were subjected to screening for gestational diabetes by DIPSI guidelines. A 75mg oral glucose load was given irrespective of their last Meal timing followed by blood glucose estimation by glucose oxidase – peroxidase method. A report of ≥140mg/dl were labeled as GDM as per DIPSI guidelines. Results: Out of 345 subjects screened, 30 (8.7%) were positive for GDM. The false positives encountered with DIPSI were 0.57% (2/345) and another 2 cases (0.57%) were false negative by DIPSI criteria. The rate of LSCS and rate of macrosomia was significantly higher in GDM population (30% and 33.33% respectively) as   compared to general population (4.4% and 2.5% respectively). In GDM group 23.3% (7) had Shoulder Dystocia compared with 0.6% (2) in the normal population. 10% were breech compared with only 0.2% in the general population with 1 IUFD requiring hysterotomy. The rates of CPD were also higher (3.3%) than the general population (1.5%). A total of 19 neonates required NICU admission of which 11 were IDM. 36.66% of IDM required NICU admission as compared to only 2.5% of the non diabetic population. Conclusions: DIPSI guidelines can use as a replacement for other more resource and time consuming and costly methods like ADA criteria for the detection of GDM in the low resource settings in developing countries.
根据DIPSI指南筛查妊娠糖尿病
目的和目的:本研究旨在发现DIPSI指南在印度人群中作为其他耗时且成本有效的方法检测妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的替代作用和有效性,并比较GDM和非GDM人群的结果。方法:选取孕周24 ~ 28周的低危女性345例,按照DIPSI指南进行妊娠期糖尿病筛查。不论最后一餐时间,均给予75mg口服葡萄糖负荷,然后用葡萄糖氧化酶-过氧化物酶法测定血糖。根据DIPSI指南,≥140mg/dl的报告被标记为GDM。结果:在筛选的345名受试者中,30名(8.7%)为GDM阳性。DIPSI假阳性为0.57% (2/345),DIPSI标准假阴性2例(0.57%)。GDM人群LSCS发生率和巨大儿发生率(分别为30%和33.33%)明显高于普通人群(分别为4.4%和2.5%)。GDM组23.3%(7)发生肩难产,而正常人群为0.6%(2)。10%为臀位,相比之下,1个IUFD需要剖宫产的普通人群中只有0.2%。慢性阻塞性肺病的发生率(3.3%)也高于普通人群(1.5%)。共有19例新生儿需要入住NICU,其中11例为IDM。36.66%的IDM患者需要入住NICU,而非糖尿病患者的这一比例仅为2.5%。结论:在发展中国家资源匮乏的环境中,DIPSI指南可以替代其他更多资源、耗时和昂贵的方法,如ADA标准,用于检测GDM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信