Measuring Household Distress and Potential Policy Impacts

Jeffrey P. Cohen, Cletus C. Coughlin, William. R. Emmons, J. Haas, Lowell R. Ricketts
{"title":"Measuring Household Distress and Potential Policy Impacts","authors":"Jeffrey P. Cohen, Cletus C. Coughlin, William. R. Emmons, J. Haas, Lowell R. Ricketts","doi":"10.20955/ES.2021.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"struggling to meet their financial obligations (e.g., making loan payments). Yet housing markets and consumer spending have been strong, and personal bankruptcies and mortgage foreclosures are at multiyear lows. Expansive government policies that include income support, extended unemployment insurance, low interest rates, and relief from default or foreclosure may help explain low levels of reported distress. However, a major concern is that current policy measures are simply postponing rather than eliminating the household distress. To offer some insight, we created a national measure of household distress that allows comparisons over time and the ability to examine the importance of specific variables and policies.1 Perhaps surprisingly, we find that the Measuring Household Distress and Potential Policy Impacts","PeriodicalId":11402,"journal":{"name":"Economic Synopses","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Synopses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20955/ES.2021.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

struggling to meet their financial obligations (e.g., making loan payments). Yet housing markets and consumer spending have been strong, and personal bankruptcies and mortgage foreclosures are at multiyear lows. Expansive government policies that include income support, extended unemployment insurance, low interest rates, and relief from default or foreclosure may help explain low levels of reported distress. However, a major concern is that current policy measures are simply postponing rather than eliminating the household distress. To offer some insight, we created a national measure of household distress that allows comparisons over time and the ability to examine the importance of specific variables and policies.1 Perhaps surprisingly, we find that the Measuring Household Distress and Potential Policy Impacts
衡量家庭困境和潜在的政策影响
努力履行他们的财务义务(例如,偿还贷款)。然而,房地产市场和消费者支出一直很强劲,个人破产和抵押贷款止赎率处于多年来的低点。包括收入支持、延长失业保险、低利率以及对违约或丧失抵押品赎回权的救济在内的扩张性政府政策可能有助于解释报告的低水平困境。然而,一个主要的担忧是,目前的政策措施只是推迟,而不是消除家庭的困境。为了提供一些见解,我们创建了一个全国性的家庭痛苦衡量标准,允许随着时间的推移进行比较,并能够检查特定变量和政策的重要性也许令人惊讶的是,我们发现测量家庭困境和潜在的政策影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信