A Cross-Sectional Study of the Impact of Pain in Older People with Frailty: Findings from the Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE75+) Study

L. Brown, John B. Young, E. Teale, G. Santorelli, A. Clegg
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Study of the Impact of Pain in Older People with Frailty: Findings from the Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE75+) Study","authors":"L. Brown, John B. Young, E. Teale, G. Santorelli, A. Clegg","doi":"10.20900/AGMR20190002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pain prevalence is higher in older people with frailty compared to fit older people. However, little is known about pain impact on the lives of older people with frailty. Objectives: To investigate pain impact in community dwelling older people (≥75 years) using data from the Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE75+) cohort study (UKCRN 18043). Methods: Participants were assessed as not frail, pre-frail or frail (phenotype model of frailty). Pain impact was measured using the Geriatric Pain Measure Short-Form (GPM-12), an instrument incorporating 10 items on how pain impacts on ambulation, social engagement, ability to accomplish tasks and sleep, along with current pain intensity and average pain intensity (last 7 days). Intrusive pain was calculated from an item in the Short-Form 36 questionnaire. Differences in the GPM-12 scores between frailty categories were compared using Kruskal-Wallis H tests. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between frailty and intrusive pain. Results: 887 participants: not frail 139; pre-frail 471; and frail 268. Total GPM-12 median (IQR): not-frail 5.0 (0.0, 12.5); pre-frail 10.0 (0.0, 27.5); and frail 40.0 (10.0, 65.0) (p ≤ 0.0001). Current pain: not frail 0.0 (0.0, 1.0); pre-frail 0 (0.0, 3.0); and frail 3.0 (0.0, 5.0) (p ≤ 0.0001). Average pain: not-frail 0.0 (0.0, 2.0); pre-frail 1 (0.0, 4.0); frail 4.0 (2.0, 6.8) (p ≤ 0.0001). There was a strong association between being frail and intrusive pain (adjusted for sex, ethniciaty, mood and high comorbid burden): OR 3.53 (95% CI 2.47, 5.04). Conclusions: This research has identified an important new finding that pain in older people with frailty appears to be of sufficient severity to impact negatively on multiple aspects of day-to-day life","PeriodicalId":72094,"journal":{"name":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/AGMR20190002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Pain prevalence is higher in older people with frailty compared to fit older people. However, little is known about pain impact on the lives of older people with frailty. Objectives: To investigate pain impact in community dwelling older people (≥75 years) using data from the Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE75+) cohort study (UKCRN 18043). Methods: Participants were assessed as not frail, pre-frail or frail (phenotype model of frailty). Pain impact was measured using the Geriatric Pain Measure Short-Form (GPM-12), an instrument incorporating 10 items on how pain impacts on ambulation, social engagement, ability to accomplish tasks and sleep, along with current pain intensity and average pain intensity (last 7 days). Intrusive pain was calculated from an item in the Short-Form 36 questionnaire. Differences in the GPM-12 scores between frailty categories were compared using Kruskal-Wallis H tests. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between frailty and intrusive pain. Results: 887 participants: not frail 139; pre-frail 471; and frail 268. Total GPM-12 median (IQR): not-frail 5.0 (0.0, 12.5); pre-frail 10.0 (0.0, 27.5); and frail 40.0 (10.0, 65.0) (p ≤ 0.0001). Current pain: not frail 0.0 (0.0, 1.0); pre-frail 0 (0.0, 3.0); and frail 3.0 (0.0, 5.0) (p ≤ 0.0001). Average pain: not-frail 0.0 (0.0, 2.0); pre-frail 1 (0.0, 4.0); frail 4.0 (2.0, 6.8) (p ≤ 0.0001). There was a strong association between being frail and intrusive pain (adjusted for sex, ethniciaty, mood and high comorbid burden): OR 3.53 (95% CI 2.47, 5.04). Conclusions: This research has identified an important new finding that pain in older people with frailty appears to be of sufficient severity to impact negatively on multiple aspects of day-to-day life
疼痛对虚弱老年人影响的横断面研究:来自社区老龄化研究75+ (CARE75+)研究的结果
背景:与健康的老年人相比,体弱多病的老年人疼痛患病率更高。然而,人们对疼痛对身体虚弱的老年人生活的影响知之甚少。目的:利用社区老龄化研究75+ (CARE75+)队列研究(UKCRN 18043)的数据,调查社区居住老年人(≥75岁)的疼痛影响。方法:参与者被评估为不虚弱,虚弱前期或虚弱(虚弱的表型模型)。疼痛影响使用老年疼痛测量简表(GPM-12)进行测量,该工具包含10个项目,包括疼痛如何影响行走、社交参与、完成任务和睡眠的能力,以及当前疼痛强度和平均疼痛强度(过去7天)。侵入性疼痛是根据短表36问卷中的一个项目计算的。使用Kruskal-Wallis H测试比较虚弱类别之间GPM-12得分的差异。Logistic回归模型用于研究虚弱和侵入性疼痛之间的关系。结果:887名受试者:不虚弱的139名;pre-frail 471;和虚弱的268。总GPM-12中位数(IQR):不虚弱5.0 (0.0,12.5);虚弱前10.0 (0.0,27.5);体弱40.0 (10.0,65.0)(p≤0.0001)。当前疼痛:不虚弱0.0 (0.0,1.0);前期脆弱0 (0.0,3.0);体弱3.0 (0.0,5.0)(p≤0.0001)。平均疼痛:不虚弱0.0 (0.0,2.0);前体弱1 (0.0,4.0);脆弱4.0 (2.0,6.8)(p≤0.0001)。身体虚弱和侵入性疼痛之间有很强的相关性(根据性别、种族、情绪和高合并症负担进行调整):OR为3.53 (95% CI 2.47, 5.04)。结论:这项研究确定了一个重要的新发现,即老年人虚弱的疼痛似乎足够严重,对日常生活的多个方面产生负面影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信