A computational model of item-based directed forgetting.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
J. Reid, Randall K. Jamieson
{"title":"A computational model of item-based directed forgetting.","authors":"J. Reid, Randall K. Jamieson","doi":"10.1037/cep0000281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Montagliani and Hockley (2019) presented evidence that item-method directed forgetting not only leads to worse recognition of forget-cued targets than remember-cued targets but also better rejection of foils associated with forget-cued targets than remember-cued targets. Based on that result, they proposed that participants elaboratively encode more category-level information about R-cued targets. We present a retrieval-based explanation of the result within an instance-based memory model. The model imports word representations from two distributional semantic models, latent semantic analysis (LSA) and random permutation model (RPM), into an instance-based model of memory, MINERVA 2. The model reproduced Montagliani and Hockley's results without requiring assumptions about elaborated encoding of category-level information at study. The simulations demonstrate that whereas Montagliani and Hockley's findings are consistent with an account grounded in elaborated encoding of words at study, the results do not force that conclusion. Instead, better encoding of remember-cued targets at study establishes the conditions for retrieval-time effects at test to produce a corresponding influence on false recognition for category-related foils. Our model can be used as a formal tool to think about and study the incidental consequences of item directed forgetting in recognition memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":51529,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Montagliani and Hockley (2019) presented evidence that item-method directed forgetting not only leads to worse recognition of forget-cued targets than remember-cued targets but also better rejection of foils associated with forget-cued targets than remember-cued targets. Based on that result, they proposed that participants elaboratively encode more category-level information about R-cued targets. We present a retrieval-based explanation of the result within an instance-based memory model. The model imports word representations from two distributional semantic models, latent semantic analysis (LSA) and random permutation model (RPM), into an instance-based model of memory, MINERVA 2. The model reproduced Montagliani and Hockley's results without requiring assumptions about elaborated encoding of category-level information at study. The simulations demonstrate that whereas Montagliani and Hockley's findings are consistent with an account grounded in elaborated encoding of words at study, the results do not force that conclusion. Instead, better encoding of remember-cued targets at study establishes the conditions for retrieval-time effects at test to produce a corresponding influence on false recognition for category-related foils. Our model can be used as a formal tool to think about and study the incidental consequences of item directed forgetting in recognition memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
基于项目的定向遗忘的计算模型。
Montagliani和Hockley(2019)提出的证据表明,项目法定向遗忘不仅导致对遗忘线索目标的识别比记忆线索目标差,而且比记忆线索目标更好地拒绝与遗忘线索目标相关的箔。基于这个结果,他们建议参与者仔细编码更多关于r提示目标的类别级信息。我们在基于实例的内存模型中给出了基于检索的结果解释。该模型将来自两个分布式语义模型(潜在语义分析(LSA)和随机排列模型(RPM))的单词表示导入到基于实例的内存模型MINERVA 2中。该模型重现了Montagliani和Hockley的结果,而不需要对研究中类别级信息的详细编码进行假设。模拟表明,尽管蒙塔利亚尼和霍克利的发现与研究中对单词进行详细编码的说法一致,但结果并不能支持这一结论。相反,在研究中对记忆线索目标进行更好的编码,为测试中的检索时间效应创造了条件,从而对类别相关箔的错误识别产生相应的影响。我们的模型可以作为一个正式的工具来思考和研究项目定向遗忘在识别记忆中的附带后果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology publishes original research papers that advance understanding of the field of experimental psychology, broadly considered. This includes, but is not restricted to, cognition, perception, motor performance, attention, memory, learning, language, decision making, development, comparative psychology, and neuroscience. The journal publishes - papers reporting empirical results that advance knowledge in a particular research area; - papers describing theoretical, methodological, or conceptual advances that are relevant to the interpretation of empirical evidence in the field; - brief reports (less than 2,500 words for the main text) that describe new results or analyses with clear theoretical or methodological import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信